The consensus view here is she is a dullard and unfit to be vice-president or president however that isn't how she is being viewed by a plurality or majority of Americans...I would argue that the latter view is infinitely more important...
Can we change that view?
And if we can't change that view how does that affect out prospects?
I didn't think Ronald Reagan, Dan Quayle, and George W Bush were the sharpest tools in the shed but a plurality or majority of Americans disagreed with my assessment...
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion
board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules
page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the
opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent
the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.