Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin Asked To Release E-Mails, Claims Executive Privilege (sound familiar?)

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:12 AM
Original message
Palin Asked To Release E-Mails, Claims Executive Privilege (sound familiar?)
Governor Is Asked To Release E-Mails
By Karl Vick
Washington Post Staff Writer
Wednesday, September 10, 2008; Page A04


Palin had claimed executive privilege for documents copied to her husband, who is not a state employee, in responding to an open records request in June made by Andrée McLeod, an activist in Anchorage. The administrative appeal filed yesterday by McLeod's attorney, Donald C. Mitchell, argued that by copying Todd Palin on sensitive state correspondence, the governor and her aides shattered the privilege rightly afforded elected officials.

"She has allowed Todd Palin -- who has not been elected by the people of Alaska, who is not a state employee -- to entangle himself apparently as he sees fit in the operations of the executive branch of the state government," Mitchell said.

"From the case law, if government voluntarily opens up that internal decision-making to what I would call civilians, then that is waiver of that protection of the government policy decision-making process. That is what happened here, and it happened because Sarah Palin doesn't understand it," he said.

Todd Palin was frequently copied on e-mails relating to Alaska State Troopers and the union representing public safety employees, according to McLeod, who received four boxes of redacted e-mails in response to her request. At the time, both Sarah and Todd Palin were complaining to the state public safety commissioner about a disciplinary matter involving Sarah Palin's ex-brother-in-law, a state trooper.

Palin also routinely does government business from a Yahoo address, gov.sarah@yahoo.com, rather than her secure official state e-mail address, according to documents already made public.

more...

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2008/09/09/AR2008090903044.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Median Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
1. They Are Perfect - McCain Has Bush's Policies and Palin Has His Style!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:18 AM
Response to Original message
2. Why on earth is she sending official state-business email copies to Todd?
The lawyer is exactly right, if she chooses to open up her official email correspondence to "outsiders", then she can't turn around and claim executive privelege on them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sharp_stick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. Because God tells her she has to
she's a Pentecostal fundie end-times loving whack-job and this cult tells their womb members (oops, I meant women) that they have to submit to the domination of their oh so superior XY chromosome carrying husbands at all times. I don't think that Sarah Palin could go to the freaking can without permission from hubby first.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:30 AM
Response to Reply #3
4. LOL! Great description--yeah, I wonder if Todd makes her do this shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IndianaGreen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:31 AM
Response to Original message
5. McCain doesn't have long to live, which makes a Palin Presidency a clear and present danger
Palin thinks she is an agent of GAWD, which automatically casts her critics as agents of Satan. This will not end well!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #5
10. Scary as hell, isn't it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:36 AM
Response to Original message
6. Does Todd have "Executive Privilege " too?
Sounds like Sarah is doing well with her lessons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hisownpetard Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
7. She is Bushier than Bush. A perfect Bush protoge.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Riddler Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:45 AM
Response to Original message
8. To a repuke, the more things "change" the more they remain the same
These people disgust me. God, I hate a fucking republican.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sebastian Doyle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 11:48 AM
Response to Original message
9. She really IS Cheney in a dress!
Maybe that's why she's taking the "Lipstick on a pig" reference seriously? She thought it referred to her being a literal reincarnation of Darth Cheney.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 08:13 PM
Response to Original message
11. Thank you, Rachel Maddow, I thought this was worthy of comment, too! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 10:24 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC