Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

You know what McCain/Palin are MOST upset about concerning "lipstick on pig"?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:21 AM
Original message
You know what McCain/Palin are MOST upset about concerning "lipstick on pig"?

Palin can no longer use the "Pitbull-Lipstick" joke in her stump speech.

It will bomb miserably now.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:22 AM
Response to Original message
1. What planet did you say you're from? Of course, she's going to cont. her ONLY speech.
Now, the Repub writers will just add a reference about Obama's slur against her.

Rovian politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:24 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. What Obama did YESTERDAY was Rovian politics.... played brilliantly too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:32 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. No, it wasn't. He used a common expression. Any time PALIN is in the news, Dems lose.nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #4
6. Agreed- it is a common expression and connected well with the people at the rally
It's a non-issue, especially since it was in context - Obama was speaking about McCain's policies, not the two as people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marsala Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #4
8. Obama is too smart to not realize the connection between the two jokes
I think this was planned.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Of course it was planned...it drew the mccain camp into a trap
They look like fools. They're unhinged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:42 AM
Response to Reply #9
10. EXACTLY!

The only way to cut through the media clutter that was all-Palin-fawning-all-the-time was with a big splash like this.


Brilliant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:29 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Don't know what you're looking at, but I'm looking at a trap set for Obama. He's talkin'bout Palin,
not the economy or healthcare or the wars.

It's a COMMON expression that is used ALL THE TIME. Palin doesn't own the word "lipstick."

McCain used the term at least twice referring to Hillary Clinton's healthcare plan. Cheney used the term referring to something about Kerry. Lots of other politicians have used the term in recent years.

That's all it was, pure & simple. No way Obama wanted to be talking about sexist charges instead of healthcare.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ContinentalOp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:33 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. GOOD! He should be talking about Palin.
People who care about healthcare, the economy or the war are not undecided still at this point. We need to tear down this cult of personality they've built around Palin. It's the only thing their campaign has going for it. We need to show them to be thin skinned, whiney, wimpy, hypocritical, and petty. If we just ignore Palin, they get to craft an image of the average jane hockey mom and it stands unchallenged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honeycombe8 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-11-08 10:38 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. No way the future PRESIDENT should be elevating status of opposing 2nd banana by talking 'bout her.
Any time a future President is discussing the little guy on the other side, he LOSES.

PRESIDENTS don't talk to or about SECOND BANANAS. That only elevates the status of the second banana, and decreases the status of the PRESIDENT.

He shouldn't even say her name, if possible. She SHOULD be totally unimportant to him, unless asked directly a specific question about the opponent's VP candidate. Then he should sluff it off, say something complimentary, and move on.

Roll in the mud with pigs, you become a pig yourself. With or without lipstick.

It's Biden's job to roll in the mud with Palin. Second banana vs. second banana. McCain is the presidential opponent. Obama should keep his eye on the ball.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
alcibiades_mystery Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. The McCain camp look like fools
Now CNN is even showing McCain's brutal Chelsea Clinton jokes.

If you can't see this as a clear Obama victory, you are weirdly hooked on losing. Or something. This is a clear clockcleaning of the Mccain smear machine. They got their asses handed to them.

Oh, by the way, whenever they show McCain using the 'lipstick on a pig' line, they have to show him dissing Hillary's health care plan, and all his surrogates have to explain that no, he was really dissing the PLAN, not Hillary! You think perfection like that happens by accident? I think you just like losing so much that you can't even see when we win something. Or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
samuraiguppy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #2
17. I think so too n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
annabanana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:25 AM
Response to Original message
3. Wow... Her one and only speech is getting a little thin. .
That line is out..
The bridge to nowhere line is getting thin...
the earmarks line is very vulnerable..

Silent Sarah will just have to come out and wave like the Pageant Contestant she is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
marylanddem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:35 AM
Response to Original message
5. Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ogneopasno Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
7. No, it's the fact that McCain used the phrase against Hillary Clinton.
nt.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:47 AM
Response to Original message
11. YES! This is how it's done.
You booger up their talking points and make them punchlines.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Liberal Dose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. You are so right!!
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
secondwind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-10-08 07:34 PM
Response to Original message
15. It was totally brilliant of Obama........when we hear the word "Lipstick"
from now on, will we think of Palin's acceptance speech, or Obama's speech?

Obama's of course!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC