Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"It turns out there was something more nauseating than the nomination of Sarah Palin...."

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 02:01 PM
Original message
"It turns out there was something more nauseating than the nomination of Sarah Palin...."
(NOTE: This column is at the top of the NY Times most-emailed list.)

NYT: The Mirrored Ceiling
Judith Warner
September 4, 2008

It turns out there was something more nauseating than the nomination of Sarah Palin as John McCain’s running mate this past week. It was the tone of the acclaim that followed her acceptance speech.

“Drill, baby, drill,” clapped John Dickerson, marveling at Palin’s ability to speak and smile at the same time as an indication of her unexpected depths and unsuspected strengths. “It was clear Palin was having fun, and it’s hard to have fun if you’re scared or a lightweight,” he wrote in Slate.

The Politico praised her charm and polish as antidotes to her lack of foreign policy experience: “Palin’s poised and flawless performance evoked roars of applause from delegates who earlier this week might have worried that the surprise pick and newcomer to the national stage may not be up to the job.”

“She had a great night. I thought she had a very skillfully written, and very skillfully delivered speech,” Joe Biden said, shades of “articulate and bright and clean” threatening a reappearance.

Thus began the official public launch of our country’s now most-prominent female politician. The condescension – damning with faint praise – was reminiscent of the more overt misogyny of Samuel Johnson. “A woman’s preaching is like a dog’s walking on his hinder legs,” the wit once observed. “It is not done well; but you are surprized to find it done at all.”...

Could there be a more thoroughgoing humiliation for America’s women?

You are not, I think, supposed now to say this....Such thoughts, we are told, are sexist. And elitist. After all, via Palin, we now hear without cease, the People are speaking. The “real” “authentic,” small-town “Everyday People,” of Hockey Moms and Blue Collar Dads whom even Rudolph Giuliani now invokes as an antidote to the cosmopolite Obamas and their backers in the liberal media. (Remind me please, once again, what was the name of the small town where Rudy grew up?)

Why does this woman – who to some of us seems as fake as they can come, with her delicate infant son hauled out night after night under the klieg lights and her pregnant teenage daughter shamelessly instrumentalized for political purposes — deserve, to a unique extent among political women, to rank as so “real”?

Because the Republicans, very clearly, believe that real people are idiots. This disdain for their smarts shows up in the whole way they’ve cast this race now, turning a contest over economic and foreign policy into a culture war of the Real vs. the Elites. It’s a smoke and mirrors game aimed at diverting attention from the fact that the party’s tax policies have helped create an elite that’s more distant from “the people” than ever before. And from the fact that the party’s dogged allegiance to up-by-your-bootstraps individualism — an individualism exemplified by Palin, the frontierswoman who somehow has managed to “balance” five children and her political career with no need for support — is leading to a culture-wide crack-up....

http://warner.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/04/the-mirrored-ceiling/?em
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
AndyTiedye Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 02:22 PM
Response to Original message
1. If You Control the MSM, You Can Fool Most of the People Most of the Time
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 02:29 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. DU'ers are fooled as well. They've been pwnded by Rove. This forum has been Palin non-stop
for over a week now.

And it doesn't matter if it's DU'ers "investigating" her.

Rove has controlled the narrative of DU for over a week.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 02:39 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. enough of the people almost all the time
on the one hand they deride Obama for his elitist, superstar demeanor....David Gregory called him an "egomaniac" yesterday...

(wholly a fabrication of the pugs, amply abetted by the slobbering M$M), then declare Palin a "rock star" themselves, somehow unable to detect the irony in their approach to the two situations, not choosing to realize that this media creation has sprung from obvlivion, only becoming a 'rock star' because of the nauseously sycophantic coverage

compare it to the derision so frequently directed at Obama ever since his 'hubristic, presumptuous' behavior in Berlin and ever since
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tblue37 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. I don't watch TV pundits. Can you tell us what Gregory said?
(I mean not just that nasty name-calling, but the context).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flamingdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
2. k n r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jade Fox Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Sep-06-08 03:03 PM
Response to Original message
5. Really good,. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC