Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The Palin gambit is pretty clear now. They intentionally selected the least-qualified candidate.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:31 AM
Original message
The Palin gambit is pretty clear now. They intentionally selected the least-qualified candidate.
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 09:33 AM by TwilightZone
It's starting to make sense. They picked a complete nobody who was utterly unqualified to be president, much less VP.

Step two is to convince voters that Palin = Obama (from an experience standpoint, a comparison that we all know is ridiculous) so that Obama looks like a lightweight. The media and the Republican pundits are already doing exactly that.

Step three is to discount Obama as equivalent only to their VP candidate and, therefore, inferior to their presidential nominee.

Stay tuned for a flood of "well, Palin isn't running against Obama, McCain is" statements from the Republicans shortly.

I hope that the average voter is smart enough to see through this little charade.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Yup.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EstimatedProphet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
2. Additionally:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:36 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Agreed. The bar is lower than ever.
I didn't think it was possible for the bar to be set lower than it was for George W. Bush. Looks like I was wrong. As I said in another thread, if she shows up at the VP debate and doesn't faint, she'll be declared the winner.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklynChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:34 AM
Response to Original message
3. that's what I've thought and stated all along. It's not going to work, though. The Dems. need to
keep pushing the judgment and temperament argument, though and get off experience. She's so obviously unqualified and she wasn't elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:10 AM
Response to Reply #3
19. Re: temperament
After those speeches last night, perhaps someone can explain to me why WE are the ones portrayed as angry, bitter, and vindictive! :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woodsprite Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:35 AM
Response to Original message
4. Then we need to remind them of that first. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DinahMoeHum Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:37 AM
Response to Original message
6. They went PERSONAL last night. BAD MOVE if you're trying
to win over Independents and other fence-rail sitters. That toilet-mouth tone of theirs last night may have just pissed off any and all "undecideds" and brought them over to Obama-Biden's side.

Plus, it fires US up even more and makes us more determined to crush the Republikkkans like a bug on November 4.

:nuke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:50 AM
Response to Reply #6
13. Negative campaigning works.
No one knows it better than the Republicans. People claim to detest negative campaigning, but many of them still buy into the BS and vote accordingly.

You're right, though. It woke us up to the fact that November isn't going to be easy and that the race is a dogfight. Better now than too late.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sugarcoated Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #13
16. Not always
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 09:58 AM by Sugarcoated
I don't buy that meme. I think it works if other factors are there, like, with Kerry, he just wasn't likable and authentic to fence sitters and indies, they didn't know him, thus, the negative ads maybe helped Repubs a bit, but it wasn't as effective as they claim. Obama's passed the sniff test, he's unflappable, he stands up for himself but in a grown up way. He's passed the sniff test. Negative, especially too much negative, can backfire. Her tone was condescending and she had a "know it all" look to her, she wasn't LIKABLE. That's key.

On edit, I remembered that the negative campaigning against Kerry, the swift boat smearing, that was very effective, but that thing went back a long way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:54 AM
Response to Reply #13
30. We'll see if it works for a woman though..
it didn't seem to work too well for Hillary. I think people will look to her to be an "America's sweetheart" type, but if she goes too shrill she will turn a lot of people off. She can't have it both ways.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #30
32. The media will play a role in that.
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 11:11 AM by TwilightZone
Early indications are that they're buying her shtick, so it will be interesting to see how long the honeymoon lasts.

That being said, her speech was remarkably snide and sarcastic, and there already seems to be a bit of backlash developing in the press. If the reports that the McCain camp is going to shield her from the press are true, they'll turn on her pretty quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #13
35. Less and less.
It killed Healey when she ran against Deval Patrick for Gov here in Mass. It didn't help Hillary or Romney or Rudith in the primary. It's one thing when both sides are engaging in it, but when it's just one side, as it is here, it looks awful, and people quite often are drawn to the victim, not that attacker.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 11:21 AM
Response to Reply #35
36. Maybe people really are getting tired ot it.
The public always claims that they don't want negative campaigning, but then stuff like the Swiftboating of Kerry turns out to be effective.

Maybe that's changing. Maybe people won't tolerate it anymore. I certainly hope that's the case.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. I hope so.
It still is effective, sadly, but I think people really are getting tired of it. It was one thing in the 90's when our biggest concern was which way Clinton's penis leaned, but with wars, a sucky economy and the like, I think people want solutions, not insults.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ramapo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:38 AM
Response to Original message
7. Appeal to the lowest common denominator
It seems the message is we have a candidate that is just like you (or maybe your next door neighbor) and that is why you should vote for her.

I would not vote for myself to be VP. There's nobody on my block qualified either. There's nobody in my town of 13,000 that is qualified. Perhaps there's somebody in my county of 1,000,00+ but I'm not sure.

Leave it to the republicans to make the argument that being smart and well educated is a bad thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:19 PM
Response to Reply #7
40. Re: smart and well-educated
That has, of course, been the recent pattern. Gore and Kerry were both declared too intelligent to be president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
8. .
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 09:40 AM by Harvey Korman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:40 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is why Biden needs to take her on ASAP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:26 AM
Response to Reply #9
21. He definitely can't wait until the debate
It could be a *long* month.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Apollo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
10. Sarah Palin is viagra for John McCain's poll ratings
By selecting her, McCain has been succesful in distracting the media and the public from the fact that he is offering 4 more years of the same.

Now we have all fallen into the GOP's trap by talking about the candidates qualifications and experience. If experience is all that matters - then McCain beats Obama.

Luckily Obama and Axelrod have seen thru McCain's little game and are fighting back - starting tonight on The O'Reilly Factor! B-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:56 AM
Response to Reply #10
14. I'm really curious to see McCain/Palin gets a bounce.
There already seems to be an undercurrent of backlash where Palin is concerned, and it'll be interesting to see if her cynical, sarcastic, smartass style ends up turning off more people than it convinces.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
predfan Donating Member (769 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. Win- win for the neocons. If McCain -Palin wins, and they could, the neocons own them.
If they lose, Romney is clean for 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. That's an interesting point.
Edited on Thu Sep-04-08 09:48 AM by TwilightZone
I originally thought that Palin was essentially a throwaway candidate for similar reasons - keep Romney, et al, available for 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:29 AM
Response to Reply #12
24. I suspected as much too when Romney announced yesterday..
seems pretty unprecedented to me, to already announce you're going to run before the race is even over. If the Bush cabal really wanted to keep a lid on these scandals, they could.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:46 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. I missed that.
Didn't realize that he'd announced already. That does seem pretty bizarre, considering that he would presumably be running against the ticket he is currently (allegedly) supporting. He's either conceding '08 to us or his support of the R ticket is transparently thin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:50 AM
Response to Reply #26
27. Yep, he was pretty blatant about it..
basically says he's supporting McCain because he doesn't want to burn any bridges, but he's primed for 2012.

http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/conventions/27802169.html?elr=KArks:DCiUMEaPc:UiD3aPc:_Yyc:aULPQL7PQLanchO7DiU
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 11:15 AM
Response to Reply #27
33. Interesting.
His support of the ticket looks a little...tepid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
seabeyond Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
15. no.... they were just stupid and now they are scramblin to justify. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheKentuckian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:00 AM
Response to Reply #15
18. The qualification argument is always stupid
If a person isn't up to the task they will let you know. Give them enough rope to hang themselves.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:31 AM
Response to Reply #18
25. Obama has written two autobiographical books..
he's been in the public eye for four years. We know a lot about him and his life experiences. We know virtually nothing about this woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 09:58 AM
Response to Original message
17. unfortunately the average voter will vote for Palin
the average voter listens to the MSM
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #17
20. They may be seeing through it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:28 AM
Response to Original message
22. Plus she's the "female" trojan horse..
make "history" by naming the first female to the GOP ticket, who just so happens to be so far on the extreme right, she would do nothing to improve women's rights, in fact would most likely roll them back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #22
28. Agreed.
If the story that Dobson was involved in the vetting process is true, they simply looked for the most conservative, religious-right R they could find that just happened to also be a woman.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Virginia Dare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #28
29. I think that was the beginning and end of the process, yes...n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LynneSin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 10:29 AM
Response to Original message
23. They selected a set of ovaries thinking we women vote for 'ovaries only'
And that's a major fucking insult to us women!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #23
31. More specifically, he picked Mother Of Five.
Not only was it a transparent attempt to garner the women's vote by default, it's shameless in its "family values" pandering.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nutshell2002 Donating Member (170 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
34. No offense to Hillary supporters
but this was never about you. It was about turning out the base pure and simple; anything else will be considered icing on the cake. I can only imagine how bad McCain's internal poll numbers actually are. Obama has thus far been smart enough not to get drawn in to the 'experience' argument. Keep it about issues and keep tying McCain to Bush. I'm very cautiously optimistic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
38. I go with Randi Rhodes theory she is there to keep Cheney vice president.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #38
39. Huh?
Sorry, hadn't heard that one. Does she think McCain will win, dump Palin, and make Cheney VP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevietheman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:20 PM
Response to Original message
41. I am confident the Obama campaign is ready to respond to this transparent bullshit. n/t
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bigleaf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:23 PM
Response to Original message
42. Obama HAS to ignore Palin. We go after McCain & tie him to Bush. She is a nobody. Biden can deal
with her come debate time. Don't play their game. They want to put Obama at her level. Fuck'em!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
43. It's an easily sidestepped trap.
Obama just needs to brush off his shoulders, get the media back on his track, and demand some discourse on the issues.

Meanwhile, we in the blogosphere tear Sarin limb from limb.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightZone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #43
44. "Sarin"
Very nice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
backscatter712 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Sep-04-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. The perfect nickname for such a toxic personality! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC