Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Pipeline Widow: The Case Todd Palin is Not Trig Palin's Dad

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:30 PM
Original message
Pipeline Widow: The Case Todd Palin is Not Trig Palin's Dad
Edited on Wed Sep-03-08 04:51 PM by demobabe
There is a HUGE cultural gap that folks in the Lower 48 do not understand: the whole Alaska Pipeline Culture. Todd Palin works a lucrative job on the North Slope which requires him to work one week on, one week off. Simply put, he's hundreds of miles away from his wife and family for a good majority of the time.

In Alaska there is a term that was coined back in the 70s, "Pipeline Widow," for the spouses left behind by pipeline workers. There are travel booths set up on the North Slope where a worker can go and get a plane ticket to anywhere in the world, and when the pipeliners were making $200 per hour, they'd travel the world on their time off. I won't elaborate on some of the behaviors only to say that this strained arrangement frequently broke up marriages and families.

Sometimes the strain is too much on the spouse who isn't working on the Pipeline. I've heard of cases where the man came home only to find the locks changed on his own house with his replacement now living with his soon to be ex-wife.

Where I'm going with this is that the initial concern is that Bristol was Trig's mom, but now we need to ask the question: who is Trig's dad?

Mainstream reporters swamped the McCain/Palin campaign with requests for paternity tests and proof that Sarah Palin was the child's mother, which they've absolutely refused to provide.

To quote a right-wing mainstay, "If you have nothing to hide, why don't you show the proof?"

Is Sarah Palin hiding the true identity of the father of her fifth child, perhaps even from her own husband?

On Edit from Rambo Liberal, this quote from CBS:

"John McCain’s campaign threatened legal action against the National Enquirer today for running a story about McCain’s running mate, Sarah Palin, allegedly having an affair with her husband’s business partner."

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/03/politics/fromtheroad/entry4413030.shtml


Other tidbits have been surfacing to suggest Sarah and Todd's relationship might be a more open marriage than your standard Christian arrangement. Note this quote from an AP article:

"Palin told The Associated Press that she and her husband, Todd, made a bet on whether Murkowski would run. If the governor says he'll enter the race, Palin has to get the Big Dipper tattooed on her ankle. If Murkowski says no, Todd gets a wedding ring inked on his finger."

Why on EARTH would she make that statement about her long time husband? What is going on with these people? There is something fishy going on here, and I think we deserve an answer since the McCain/Palin campaign has been so defensive of these issues, even going as far to cancel public appearances on normally Republican friendly TV shows like the Larry King Show.

Clearly they are hiding something, or else they wouldn't be so defensive with the media, angrily chastising them the way they have.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Vinca Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
1. Let's not go there - there's so much else. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prefer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
2. What about the issues?
the economy? the war?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:32 PM
Response to Original message
3. Right - and who cares, under law the child is Palins. How low are we going to take this?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Yeah
who cares if they are a couple of sluts, no biggie, it's not like they are Hyper Christians fucking everyone anyway, cutting off FUNDS for UNWED Mothers, and she did that "personally"..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:38 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. LOL I hear you and I understand you are angry.
I hadn't seen the National Enquirer news on this when I wrote that. OMFG - :rofl:

She has a boatload of "vettin" to talk through now!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
20. Awww
I was only funnin' you :)

I didn't know about the Enquirer until a few minutes ago, so you beat me..

is she even going to GIVE the SPEECH?

What's the POINT? :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. I don't know but this is getting to be a hell of a circus
I heard the Enquirer has had "vetters" up there since the announcement. This could be fun just to watch the hypocrites talk their way out of that one. The media owes us since they failed to do their jobs over the last 8 years. - sad that the enquirer is the one to force them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #10
21. I hadn't seen the National Enquirer news when I wrote this
Stranger and stranger....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RagAss Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:40 PM
Response to Reply #3
12. Until we reveal that she shot herself to win the Purple Heart.
that's how low !!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LaurenG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #12
14. Well I don't think you're too far off. Though the names may have changed
and circumstances a bit different, you may have hit the nail on the head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
corkhead Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. maybe this explains it...
Edited on Wed Sep-03-08 04:35 PM by corkhead
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:35 PM
Response to Original message
5. Two things...I think this is outlandish and desperate. Secondly, that's just sleazy shit to do. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. You are calling the WRONG person Sleazy
take a look at the CANDIDATES, not a DU'r..

idiots.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 06:16 PM
Response to Reply #7
52. Oy...
My post wasn't calling the DU'er sleazy. She's just repeating the rumored news that's being spread like hot cakes.

My post is on the story itself and that it's sleazy and we shouldnt' focus our attention on it so much, but focus on the issues. So far every story that has come out about Palin is not necessarily untrue but there's a "fall guy/girl" ---> Of course this is relating to the cleaned up stories. This new one is going into a direction that is truly reprehensible.

Maybe it's because I was an Edwards supporter who didn't think his private life had anything to do with his professional career. I realize to some that is more important than not. However, I would like to hold that up to anyone.

I'm just not on this band wagon, although other Edwards fans probably are revelling in this. But once again, I wasn't calling the DU'er sleazy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Wapsie B Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
8. Now this is what I'm talking about!
If you talk the talk, you damn well better walk the walk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Life Long Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:38 PM
Response to Original message
9.  Todd saw to Trig over McSame's VP choice in which Palin was with Brit and Larry over Tom
Or something like that. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:39 PM
Response to Original message
11. Deleted sub-thread
Sub-thread removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Bucky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
13. Are you insane? Obviously the post of a disruptor.
Get your head right or get over to Freep Republic, where this anti-woman trash and slash politics belong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #13
25. Hi bucky, no, I'm not a disruptor
I've been in the trenches on the liberal side for years and years, have an interesting resume in that regard. I've posted on your threads, too. You didn't call me a disruptor then.

National Enquirer is reporting some interesting things, read up... peace.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
No Elephants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
15. Confused. Most neo fundies I know think tattoos are against the Bible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
951-Riverside Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:45 PM
Response to Original message
16. or maybe he is
think for a moment then... :puke:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:47 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. Like I said, then they have nothing to hide. Right?
I have no problems whatsoever with being wrong about all of this. All they have to do is show me the proof.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bombtrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:46 PM
Response to Original message
17. This kind of empty bullshit speculation thread can or will be our downfall
not kicked and not reccomended.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RamboLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 04:47 PM
Response to Original message
18. CBS just blogged the Story and National Review has it up
ST. PAUL, MINN.) – John McCain’s campaign threatened legal action against the National Enquirer today for running a story about McCain’s running mate, Sarah Palin, allegedly having an affair with her husband’s business partner.

“The smearing of the Palin family must end. The allegations contained on the cover of the National Enquirer insinuating that Gov. Palin had an extramarital affair are categorically false. It is a vicious lie,” said McCain senior adviser Steve Schmidt.

“The efforts of the media and tabloids to destroy this fine and accomplished public servant are a disgrace. The American people will reject it.”

The Enquirer also alleges that Palin unjustly fired a public safety official while she was governor of Alaska, but the story is based entirely on unnamed sources. The Enquirer has also paid sources in the past to speak with them, something mainstream media outlets do not do.

“Sen. McCain and Gov. Palin look forward to discussing the issues that Americans care about, fixing broken government, creating jobs, making our country energy independent and securing the peace for the next generation by bringing the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan to a victorious end,” said Schmidt.

“Legal action will be considered with regard to this disgraceful smear.”

http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/09/03/politics/fromtheroad/entry4413030.shtml
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:00 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Well, maybe if it's that guy's kid instead of Todd's...
...they'll applaud her for keeping the child - I can see it happening.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:37 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. Legal action will be "considered"?? Just considered? Them's weasel words.
If someone printed a false story about me having an affair, there wouldn't be any consider about it. I'd sue they ass.

Maybe that's just me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #32
34. Exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. I would LOVE to see that. This threat shows how little McCain understands lawsuits.
Please, please file suit against the Enquirer!!

That is a blank check to conduct court ordered discovery into EVERY issue that is connected to the case, including the medical records that might reveal the truth. One cannot file a lawsuit claiming damage to their reputation without subjecting themselves to the search for the truth, from their own records.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #38
40. Now THAT would be beautiful!
I guarantee there would be a paternity test ordered then! :popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:01 PM
Response to Original message
24. Another decoy, folks
Don't waste ammunition on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:11 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. How would you know?
This is a serious question. They are hiding something, and the question is worth asking.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slackmaster Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. I suspect it is a decoy because of the unusual number of "stories" that have turned out to be BS
1. Some kind of sordid story gets "leaked".

2. LW blogs vomit all over themselves.

3. Story turns out to be bogus.

Over and over and over.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
27. It's also interesting to note that she hid her pregnancy for SEVEN months
Sure, there are other reasons this could be, but it is still suspect...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
29. You are making a story out of nothing but conjecture. Unless you have some
facts to back up these accusations, they would be better left alone. National Enquirer is not what I would consider a reliable source.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:31 PM
Response to Reply #29
31. Prove to me Todd Palin is the father.
They refuse to show a birth certificate or produce a paternity test. They have nothing to hide, right? Then it shouldn't be a problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #31
46. You're the one hawking the story. Prove to me that he's not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #46
48. No, you go first.
Please :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
30. Who cares!!!!!!!!
Enough already!!! There's plenty on Palin's conservative views to attack her on, there's no need to delve into her bedroom.

This is starting to turn into a sexist attack on the woman and it may backfire. Women are women first and party affiliation comes second or lower down the line. I remember when the media viciously attacked Hillary between the IA and NH primaries, even Republican women were rooting for her to win the NH primary. The sexist attacks were that rampant by the media and the LW blogs. I see the same thing now being done to Palin.

Stick to the issues, her marriage and her kids are none of anybody's business.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:38 PM
Response to Reply #30
33. Typically I wouldn't care, except...
We're dealing with the party that makes these kinds of things routine issues when they happen to Democrats and also make laws that affect your own personal behavior.

Believe me, if Repugs continue holding office, they'll have no problem legislating what goes on in your bedroom. You have to hold them to their own standards, or else YOU could be toast.

Makes sense to live and let live, but Republicans don't adhere to this idea... you are far too civil and rational. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:56 PM
Response to Reply #33
42. I just don't like women to be attacked in sexist terms.
Even women who I don't agree with politically or want anywhere near the Oval office. I hated what was done to Hillary and, because I'm not a hypocrite, I don't like what I see is being done to Palin either. I don't find it amusing to question whether she could perform the job while taking care of a baby with disabilities and a pregnant daughter. Would anybody dream of asking similar questions if she were a man? Hell, no!!!

Feminism is something that applies to ALL women, not just the ones we like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #30
37. How is it sexist?
Was it sexist when the Enquirer reported on Edwards' affair?

This is ALL fair game, and ALL deserves coverage.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sniffa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #37
41. Who are you responding to?
Is it one of the dead-ender, Victims?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #37
43. Many of the attacks on Palin are sexist.
I don't want the woman to become our next VP, but I refuse to bash her on a personal level. I didn't like it when it was done to Hillary and I don't like it being done to Palin or any other woman, for that matter. I'm not a feminist just to stand up for the women I like, that's way too easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 06:00 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. Many of the attacks on Palin are sexist.
I don't want the woman to become our next VP, but I refuse to bash her on a personal level. I didn't like it when it was done to Hillary and I don't like it being done to Palin or any other woman, for that matter. I'm not a feminist just to stand up for the women I like, that's way too easy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 06:01 PM
Response to Reply #44
45. Oops, sorry for the double post.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 06:02 PM
Response to Reply #44
47. Personal attack does not equal sexist attack
Mixing way too many things here. Enjoy some humor:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. Wow, they do look alike.
Thanks!!

:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #49
50. I died laughing when I saw it...
...amazing, huh? :D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 06:14 PM
Response to Reply #44
51. Example, please.
Until you can offer a specific example of a sexist attack on Palin, your accusation is baseless.

Going after her for various scandals, including those within her family, are NOT sexist. That's just plain old politics. And considering the hypocrisy of the right wing, we need to be going after them HARD.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TrogL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
35. Do we have a photograph of the business partner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:43 PM
Response to Reply #35
36. Good question... I want to see it, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 05:50 PM
Response to Original message
39. Where is the birth certificate? Why is there no record of birth at MatSu?
Andrew Sullivan had posted the hospital birth records where Trig was born. No baby recofd matched Trig on the day he was born. What is going on here?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 07:28 PM
Response to Original message
53. Jake Tapper: Is the McCain Camp Spreading Smears in the Name of Fighting Them?
Obviously, they want to rally voters behind her. But are they doing Palin a service?

"Members of this campaign went to off-the-record lunches with reporters today," Schmidt told Katie Couric, Tuesday, according to Politico, "and they were asked if she would do paternity tests to prove paternity for her last child. Smear after smear after smear, and it's disgraceful and it's wrong. And the American people are going to reject it overwhelmingly when they see her."

First, that's an intriguing definition of off-the-record, but second, what a reporter asks is not the same thing as what a reporter reports. It could be argued that Schmidt, raising the notion of paternity on national TV, did far more to spread that unpleasantness to millions of voters than anything anyone in the mainstream media did.

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/09/is-the-mccain-c.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:18 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC