Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Palin pick makes sense if they are confident they can Steal it !

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 01:39 PM
Original message
Palin pick makes sense if they are confident they can Steal it !

Like many people here I've been thinking about this for days.

It's the one thought I keep coming back to.

If they are confident they can Steal this election

then the qualifications of their VP pick are irrelevant.

Hope to hell I'm wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
im1013 Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. That's what I've been thinking, too!!!!
I hope to hell we're wrong, too!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 01:58 PM
Response to Reply #1
13. After the elections of 2000 & 2004

It's hard not to think about this.

Belated Welcome to DU!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im1013 Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Thanks LibertyorDeath!!

:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. If they were confident they could steal it, they'd run Gingrich or Delay.
They wouldn't waste time on lightweight symbolism, they'd just turn power over to their own backroom dudes, whoever that is these days.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. Good point but there are big ego's involved here

Palin is most likely Rove's choice imo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Yeah, maybe.
The good thing about being the power behind the throne is you don't have to run for office, you don't get the blame when it all goes south, and you can stay behind the scenes for the next king you make. So maybe no one wants to be made visible in this election.

I don't know if it's Rove. This is simplistic for Rove, unless their is more to come. This is more like what Gingrich used to talk about in the 90s--splitting the Democratic Party by running someone like Nader, or nominating an African American or female Republican candidate to lure voters to his party. Gingrich was convinced that all Americans are just sheep who vote on issues of identity, and that a female Republican would overcome all the objections to specific Republican policies, like abortion. Gingrich never understood the intellectual nature of Democratic ideals, so he just assumed we voted our guts and genitals the way Republicans do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. Well there is something very Bizarre going on
Edited on Wed Sep-03-08 02:08 PM by LibertyorDeath
In the Rethug camp for MCcain and his team to make such a spectacular Fuck up

of a choice for VP.

MCcain has been around DC politics for a quarter Century It makes me think

he has been assured of the Presidency so it's ok to go with a complete neophyte for VP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #16
19. The opposite is also possible
His polls may show that he doesn't have a chance, so he's picking the candidate that they show might shake things up.

Remember, if all this about stealing the elections is true, they still have to do it state by state, which means they are really only able to do it in states that they have some control over but that are likely to go Democrat. Florida and Tennessee in 2000, Ohio in 04, for instance. If it's a real landslide, then stealing Florida or Ohio might not help.

It's also possible that McCain just out-thought himself. It's been a long time since he's been in touch with the average voter. This may have been him playing a hunch, then finding out his hunch was bad.

And I wouldn't write the requiem mass yet. George HW Bush was this much of a joke, too, and was trailing Dukakis by a lot more. Dukakis picked a venerable statesman as his running mate, and HW picked Dan Quayle. You'll notice who the history books say won that one. Just sayin', I ain't puttin' down my hammer until the last nail is driven.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:51 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. If Rove was in jail or dead take your pick I'd be breathing

a lot easier about this.

He is alive and well and as corrupt as they come.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 01:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. I think no one wanted to be on McBush's losing ticket.
Those Reps want to be able to run again in 2012 w/o the stigma of losing this year.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. Bingo.
That's why you have Mitt Romney basically saying he wants to run in 2012 if McCain loses. No one wants to get near this. No one of consequence, anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
azmouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. This year really reminds me of 1996.
The Reps knew Clinton was going to win in a landslide so they 'gave' the nomination to Dole knowing he would lose but that it wouldn't hurt any candidates for 2000.

McBush was 'given' the nomination and he 'chose' an unknown VP to at least inject some semblance of life into his campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Auggie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
4. I'm sure they have it narrowed to one or two key states
they think Palin could help win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gidney N Cloyd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 01:43 PM
Response to Original message
5. It also makes sense if they're confident they're going to lose it.
Might as well earn some points with certain constituencies like the religious right and the GOP women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #5
10. Yeah that was my starting point I thought they were

throwing MCcain away knowing they can't win this time round

but now I think there going to steal it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 01:50 PM
Response to Original message
9. If you've been paying attnetion to Palast and Mark Crispin MIller........
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Yes I have
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 03:27 PM
Response to Reply #12
21. Zackly !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1corona4u Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 01:53 PM
Response to Original message
11. Oh, I have no doubt they will try....
but let's hope they don't manage to pull it off.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
im1013 Donating Member (527 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:08 PM
Response to Original message
17. My first reaction
when I found out McLame was the nominee, was that they are going to
steal more than they ever have because the GOPers don't have much
faith in McLame being able to win. So they have to steal A LOT to make
up for it.

Our only hope is if Obama wins by a landslide, because if it's even
remotely close they'll steal enough to win it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LibertyorDeath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Sep-03-08 02:27 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. I've arrived at the same point but only after his

Amazingly Craptastic VP pick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Fri May 03rd 2024, 12:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC