Excerpting out only the most relevent points from:
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=132&topic_id=6870507&mesg_id=6870507
The age of consent is defined as 16 years old, according to Alaska statutory rape laws.
Any person who is 16 years old or older who has sexual intercourse with a minor who is 13-, 14-, or 15-years-old will be charged with sexual abuse of a minor in the second degree.
In addition, Alaska statutory rape laws declare that anyone who is 18 years old or older who has sex with a person who is 16 or 17, can be charged with sexual abuse in the third degree.
Facts:
Levi DOB 5/3/90
Bristol DOB 10/18/90
***********************
Age of consent is 16, which I guess means they can have sex as long as it's with someone who is 16 or 17. A 16-year-old cannot have sex with a 15 (or younger) year old.
An 18-year-old cannot have sex with a 17 or 16-year-old.
(What insanity! What happens if two teens, one 16, one 17 start having sex. It's perfectly legal, UNTIL the 17-year-old turns 18, and then suddenly it's ILLEGAL, because the partner is still only 17? Do they have to have the same birthday? Take an abstinence break until the partner's birthday??? Sheesh... but anyway...)
So, in the case of lovers Levi and Bristol, until May of this year, they fell into that exact category! He is 5 months older than her, they were both 16 or 17.
BUT!! In May of this year, Levi turned 18, while poor Bristol remained a mere 17-year-old (until October 18th, about 6 weeks away still).
Fortunately, Bristol was already pregnant by that time (whew! just under the wire!!) And I'm sure they're not having sex anymore, at least not until Bristol turns 18!
Doesn't this all just sound a little too convenient?