Do these photos tell a story about maternity fraud?

[KalicoKitty]

One photo is in 2006 and the other in 2008. One is indoors and one is outdoors. They have removed coats for the indoor photo, but their clothing is the same! Had to be the same day. The date of the article is October 23, 2006.




Published: October 23, 2006

http://dwb.adn.com/news/politics/story/8334949p-8231037c.html


This photo below was taken six weeks before Trig Palin’s birth. (Have their jackets off, but same outfits, hair-dos, and same dusky sky as in the 2006 photo!)





Bristol (far right) looks more pregnant than she does like someone who’s been suffering with mono for three and a half months.

http://www.zimbio.com/Bristol+Palin/articles/50/Rumors+Sarah+Palin+Fifth+Child+Bristol+Palin

[livetohike]

1. This can't be right. Or can it? The youngest daughter

doesn't look like she grew at all....

[LisaL]

2. Both of those photos are from 2006.

[SmokingJacket]

3. Hm, I guess that second pic is actually an old one.

The daughter is probably just a little chubby.

[OmmmSweetOmmm]

4. So why would a family use a photo from 2 years before as a current publicity photo?

[tabatha]

5. I believe that the 2006 photo was purposely mistitled.

I think I read it on mudflats?