Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Video of Sarah Palin while 7 months pregnant.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:53 PM
Original message
Video of Sarah Palin while 7 months pregnant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:56 PM
Response to Original message
1. 7 months. My wife's face changed. Palin looks the same. This may have legs
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 12:58 PM by BrentTaylor
I didn't believe the rumors. But seeing her there makes me wonder
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SmokingJacket Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:57 PM
Response to Original message
2. If she was faking it, why not stuff a pillow in there or something?
That's what I don't get. But she really did look like she was hiding her belly. Weird!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. My honest guess. How many girls either don't know that their pregnant or don't tell their
parents until later on. I think if Palin is the grandmother of Trig, Palin didn't know until her daughter was several months pregnant and then once plans were made, announced her own pregnancy.

I also don't think the baby was a month premature.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:16 PM
Response to Reply #2
7. My guess is that the pre-arranged adoption fell through when Downs was discovered.
So when the adopting parents backed out Sarah was SUDDENLY on the spot to concoct a cover story, so SUDDENLY, and without much chance to plan the whole thing out, had to announce her own pregnancy cover story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #7
10. That's an interesting twist.
Is there a particular point in the pregnancy when Downs becomes discoverable? 7 months maybe?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BumRushDaShow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #10
13. They can usually test for it between 3 - 4 months (11 - 17 weeks)
without too much damage to the developing fetus. This is a popular time for having an amniocentesis done and for genetic screening. My younger sister was an older mother, having her first at 43, and it was recommended for her to have it done at about 16 weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. In between the first and second trimesters, they do an AFP blood test to look for irregularities
IT's a routine test for pretty much all pregnant women. If the alpha-fetal protein levels are off, it usually indicates a condition like Down's Syndrome. Abnormalities are then confirmed by more concrete methods.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IggleDoer Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 04:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
28. There is a risk to the fetus when testing for Downs?
If Governor Gidget was going to keep the baby regardless, there is no reason to do the testing.

If someone else was adopting the baby, they would have an interest in knowing if the child was normal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chloroplast Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 05:28 PM
Response to Reply #28
39. I never thought of that.
If as a pro-life proponent she planned on keeping baby Trig, why do the test at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Who Tests For Downs On a 17 Year Old Girl?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. That was my question when this possibility was brought up on another thread. Can Down's be spotted
in a sonogram once the baby becomes a certain size? I asked that question with no reply.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamalone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #17
30. Actually, yes it can be detected by sonogram.
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 04:09 PM by mamalone
One of the ways that testing for DS is done is by measuring the thickness of the skin folds at the back of the neck. If the skin there measures thicker than normal it is a marker for DS. It's not conclusive, so they would then usually follow with amnio to be sure.


and in other news... WOOHOO... after 5 years, I finally hit 1000 posts!!!:party: :bounce: :headbang: :applause: :patriot: :yoiks:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pizoxuat Donating Member (69 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #14
18. I dunno how they do things in Alaska
But here in Washington I was offered the screening test which just takes some of the mothers blood and checks for markers for Down Syndrome as well as neural tube defects and trisomy 18. It's cheap and can give you peace of mind, almost every single mother-to-be I know has it done regardless of the mother's age or physical condition. If they detect anything in the mother's blood then they do the amniocentesis which would give you a stronger indication one way or another. If that came back positive, then they would do a detailed ultrascan and look for the physical indicators of Down Syndrome.

The first test is done at 12 weeks and it takes 1 week to get the results. They generally wait until 16 weeks for the amniocentesis. The ultrasound would be scheduled immediately afterwards so it would be up to technician availablity. So 4 months is an appropriate time frame for discovery.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IggleDoer Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 04:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
29. But if a woman steadfastly refused to abort the child
why do the test at all?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamalone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 04:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
36. So that you can be prepared.
Emotionally prepared, and also so that the medical professionals can be prepared for any problems when the baby is born... for example a significant heart defect. I would imagine this is especially important in a place like Alaska, where you have to travel a great distance to find a hospital with a decent NICU. I have adopted kids with DS, so a DS diagnosis obviously wouldn't change my plans regarding my pregnancy, but I certainly get an amnio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
43. K, Thanks
For the info.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamalone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #7
33. Very doubtful in my opinion.
It surprises most people, but in the adoption world there are actually waiting lists for newborns with DS. There is no problem whatsoever placing a tiny baby with this condition. If they did have a family preselected to adopt, who then backed out upon the diagnosis, they would have been able to find another family easily.... very very easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #2
34. The whole point is that no one knew she was pregnant.
If she was thin one day and the next she's got padding, that would bring suspicion. Padding wouldn't have worked. You can't imagine how many people want to feel your belly when your pregnant. Some will even do it without permission.

The way she was sitting with her legs crossed was so unprofessional. I was always taught to cross at the ankle. Her leg was hoisted up to her chest. Really tacky!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:58 PM
Response to Original message
3. nope, doesn't look to be
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maestro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
4. Wow.
It sure does seem that she is trying to hide something because she does not look the slighest bit pregnant in that video.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Speck Tater Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
6. And a video summary of the situation ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:26 PM
Response to Reply #6
8. lol! I just finished watching this one when you posted it! It is very good.
Interesting that he said that this rumor had been swirling around Alaska 4 months ago.

I have been trying to find MSM info about her daughter being out of school for 5 months but can't come up with anything.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:32 PM
Response to Reply #8
9. They must have taken some pictures of non-pregnant Bristol during that long time.
Maybe we could have a quick look? That would put the whole thing to rest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:53 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. Bristol was taken out of school for "mono" so I'm sure there weren't any
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 02:10 PM by OmmmSweetOmmm
photos taken then. The photo below was taken in February 2008



That was taken at the Governor's Conference. 6 months pregnant and in 2 1/2" to 3" heels.



This was taken in March, a month and a half before delivery!



More at the Daily Kos
http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2008/8/30/121350/137/486/580223
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 02:06 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. "her state of pregnancy was not apparent by observation" - flight attendant of AA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:33 PM
Response to Original message
11. 7 months = 30 1/2 weeks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmmmSweetOmmm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:40 PM
Response to Reply #11
12. Having been pregnant twice to full term, both pics are way too familiar! lol!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldem4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 01:59 PM
Response to Original message
19. I had a severe case of mono when I was 16
from the first boy I ever kissed-hello irony-and I was out of school for 6 weeks. The school thought that was excessive amount of time but still sent a makeup work teacher to help me keep up my work. Mono for 5 months. NO WAY.

Also, I have four sons. The first son I was in labor for 26 long, long hours. But my fourth son was induced, and the time between induction and when I had delivered vaginally and was back in my room was an HOUR AND A HALF. This is not uncommon for women who have had multiple pregnancies.

Sorry, no WAY that a OB-GYN doctor, with a woman who over 40 (which is considered high risk just because of her age), with the water leaking, with a high risk Downs syndrome baby being her FIFTH child, is going to say SURE take an EIGHT hour flight with your contractions started. NO WAY.

I'm not a doctor, but if there is a doctor who said OK to her flying like that and all the facts above are true-he needs to be investigated. I can not believe any doctor would OK that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 02:16 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. I had mono three times as a teen (and sadly I never kissed anyone to catch it)
I was out for almost five weeks during the worst case of it. The other two times it lasted about three weeks. I know of one person who had to keep his daughter out of school for almost seven weeks, but that's the longest case I've ever heard of personally. 5 months? impossible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberaldem4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 02:46 PM
Response to Reply #22
23. They thing that bothers me about this the worst
is that they think the American public is so uninformed and dumb, they can put this out and we'll buy it. Karl Rove, you suck ass.

I actually feel sorry that the family and that little innocent baby who will have life long challenges. Taking on such a huge responsibility like running for VP while that little baby needs lots of love and attention is something I don't understand.

No matter whose womb he came out of, Sarah Palin is the main caregiver. Looks like that would have been the most important thing to her, but I guess not. My boys were to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 02:13 PM
Response to Original message
21. Hey, at least the redhead in "desperate housewives" strapped on a fake belly
to pull off the same stunt. No way is that woman seven months pregnant.

Just another lie brought to you by the hypocrites of the GOP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IggleDoer Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 04:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
32. Bree on Desperate Houswifes stated ths she was a Republican.
n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lorien Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 05:07 PM
Response to Reply #32
38. Ah, that's right! Maybe Palin is a big fan
she doesn't strike me as a person with an imagination of her own, so I wouldn't be surprised if she picked up the scheme from her teevee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
24. I think I saw her head move back and to the left
Back, and to the left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BeyondGeography Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 02:50 PM
Response to Original message
25. I think I saw her head move back and to the left
Back, and to the left.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ObamaKerryDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Hmm...
Doesn't look 7 months pregnant to me. This could get very interesting...:popcorn:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Oh Please.. no gallows humor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
31. Who was the interviewer in that last clip? Looked a bit like Rachel. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RadicalTexan Donating Member (607 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 04:20 PM
Response to Original message
35. Picture of Palin, daughter Bristol, and son Trig backstage yesterday or Friday:


Bad angle, huh?

Also, Palin's body language around this baby, to me, seems suspicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamalone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #35
37. May I ask where you got that pic? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
joshcryer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #35
42. Is Bristol the one holding the child?
Looks like she put on a lot of pregnancy weight imho.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Jacobin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 05:51 PM
Response to Original message
40. Interesting
I wonder if anyone has pictures of the governor during the two months before delivery?

Daughter home for 5 months before the delivery with 'mono'?

Keeping up appearances is probably what it comes down to
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LWolf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
41. I haven't heard this factor mentioned.
Edited on Sun Aug-31-08 06:32 PM by LWolf
I don't have an opinion either way. I do think this is significant enough to be considered when looking at the odds:

The chances of giving birth to a Down's Syndrome child is one in ten for 48 yo women; one in two thousand for teenagers. At least, according to this source:

http://hcd2.bupa.co.uk/fact_sheets/pdfs/Downs_syndrome.pdf
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Aug-31-08 08:49 PM
Response to Original message
44. And, here's a pic of her in the same outfit in the video. Look pregnant to me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC