Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain's Strategic Blunder: Opening the Door to Keating Five

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 06:11 AM
Original message
McCain's Strategic Blunder: Opening the Door to Keating Five
Edited on Fri Aug-22-08 06:12 AM by babylonsister
http://www.mydd.com/story/2008/8/21/185928/267

McCain's Strategic Blunder: Opening the Door to Keating Five

by Jonathan Singer, Thu Aug 21, 2008 at 06:59:28 PM EST


The McCain campaign thinks that it has an opportunity to turn their candidate's stupendous gaffe -- failing to recall how many houses his family owns -- into a positive by running an advertisement linking Barack Obama to Tony Rezko. Obama, claims the McCain campaign, got help buying his house from Rezko, a Chicagoan who has since gone to jail but received some $14 million in taxpayer money.

The problem with this attack? Aside from being thoroughly misleading -- Obama has not been seriously alleged to have done anything unethical in his interactions with Rezko -- this ad is a serious strategic blunder by the McCain campaign. Why? It blows wide open the door to talk about McCain's all-too-close relationship with Charles Keating and well reported on though somewhat forgotten charter membership in the so-called "Keating Five."

The Keating Five is an old story, so many reporters have shied away from saying much about it because it isn't new -- there aren't a whole lot of new developments in the story. But with McCain talking about allegedly shady relationships, the opportunity is there to go back over McCain's ties to Keating -- whose nefarious activities, which were at least in part aided by his relationship with McCain, ended up costing the American taxpayer $3.4 billion (a whole lot more than the $14 million Rezko was alleged to have received).

Just how close was McCain to Keating? Take a look at this rundown I posted back in January:

Though McCain might try to downplay his involvement, his campaigns received $124,000 from Keating and his associates during the 1980s (AP, 3/2/91), and McCain was described as being personally closer to Keating than any of the other members of the Keating Five (Roll Call, 1/20/92). What's more, McCain accepted more than $15,000 in free trips from Keating, including vacations to Keating's resort in the Bahamas -- trips that McCain failed to disclose at the time (New York Times, 2/28/91; San Francisco Chronicle, 12/3/90).


In the end, the crash of Keating's savings and loan -- which had been shielded by some of his best friends in the United States Senate -- cost billions to the American taxpayer, as mentioned above, and all told the federal government ended up on the hook for close to $125 billion in the fallout of the crisis that befell the underregulated industry in the late 1980s and early 1990s.

Does McCain really want to have to talk about all of this? About the Bahaman vacations he took paid for by Keating? Probably not. But he may soon have to as a result of the shortsightedness of his campaign advisors. Nice move team McCain!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 06:14 AM
Response to Original message
1. Maybe this is what the Obama surrogates are going to do
Work on exposing things like Keating and keep the McNopoly housing crisis alive in the media
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 06:17 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I think it would be smart. McBush is going there, why not Obama?
This isn't personal, but people should be reminded imo.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Alter Ego Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 07:52 AM
Response to Reply #2
16. No, it's not personal--and it's much more serious than a verbal gaffe
about houses or not knowing how much gas costs, as bad as those were. The Keating Five should be brought up relentlessly from every arm of Obama's campaign. The DNC makes ads, surrogates give a rundown on news shows, Obama talks about it on the stump, and volunteers distribute pamphlets or whatever.

Saturate the market from every possible angle--but wait until the GE starts and McAngry has only $85 mil to spend and can't afford to stop Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wellstone dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 06:43 AM
Response to Reply #1
10. That is what happened on hardball last night
they were talking about the houses, Mccain speaker brought up Rezko, Obama speaker responded by just saying, "Keating 5" over and over again.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 06:17 AM
Response to Original message
3. I think he was lulled to sleep thinking the Obama campaign was going to be soft and squishy.
WRONG, ASSHOLE!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 06:23 AM
Response to Reply #3
7. I think a lot of politicians in paticular all those in the GOP thought Obama was a pushover.
I'm bloody glad he's not.

:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
H2O Man Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 06:20 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yep.
This, of course, fits the model of Obama being a "counter-puncher." McCain leads with a punch that leaves his chin exposed; Obama hits him hard.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bushisanidiot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 06:22 AM
Response to Original message
5. Obama didn't take bribes or use his authority to protect a crook, JOHN "elitist" MCCAIN DID!
Edited on Fri Aug-22-08 06:23 AM by bushisanidiot
McMansion accuses Obama of associating with people who are crooked, yet Obama himself is scandal free. McMansion has a history of scandals, Keating 5, screwing over his POW buddies in the 90's, adultery after adultery, marrying a child bride who turned into his personal ATM, and I'm sure there's more we don't know about because McComb-over hids behind his POW stories and WON'T RELEASE HIS MILITARY RECORDS!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
opihimoimoi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 06:32 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. McCrash is the Pubs Best? WTF? He got more shit in the living rooms and the many closets than a feed
lot....

Damn...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grannie4peace Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 06:23 AM
Response to Original message
6. go get em barack!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hope And Change Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 06:33 AM
Response to Original message
9. K & R!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
11. Everyone would mail that to Obama campaign
I'm not saying they are unaware....but you know... just a friendly reminder.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EV_Ares Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 06:49 AM
Response to Original message
12. Keep this K&R and hopefully the Obama campaign will respond and bring this
up if McSame wants to play this game.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GoesTo11 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 07:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. I think they know about it without our help this time.
After McCain's Rezko ad, there is a 100% chance Keating 5 will be brought up in the election, it's just a matter of when.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lamp_shade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. I don't think now is a good time
I'd wait until after the republican convention... and then some... when things calm down a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ingac70 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
13. Kick.
A commercial highlighting McCain's involvement in the last banking crisis is exactly what we need right now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mwb970 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 07:19 AM
Response to Original message
14. I'm surprised we have heard so little of the Keating 5 to date.
It highlights so clearly one of mccain's many, many flaws - his opportunism and greed. I think people are gradually figuring out that this guy is a Grade A Little Jerk. I hope they figure it out faster this time than they did with bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
starroute Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-22-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
18. Charles Keating and Carl Lindner
Since Carl Lindner has recently surfaced as a major fundraiser for McCain, it might be worthwhile to consider his connections with Charles Keating.

According to Pete Brewton's The Mafia, CIA and George Bush:

http://www.talkaboutdrinks.com/group/alt.coffee/messages/354120.html

Perhaps Lindner's biggest contribution to the S&L debacle was Charles Keating. During the 1960s, Keating and his Cincinnati law firm represented Lindner and his interests. Apparently the two were so taken with one another that in 1972, Keating quit his law firm and went to work for Lindner directly as executive vice president of American Financial. Four years later, in 1976, Keating moved to Phoenix to take over Lindner's home building company, American Continental Homes. Two years later, Lindner sold the company to Keating, who changed its name to American Continental Corporation.

However, the next year, 1979, Lindner, Keating and an attorney date were charged by the Securities and Exchange Commission with making improper loans to friends and associates from Lindner's Provident Bank in Cincinnati. Lindner and Keating signed a consent decree, agreeing not to violate the law again, and Lindner paid $1.4 million out of his own pocket to his company, American Financial. More than one observer has noted that the charges against the two were remarkably similar to the ones that would be leveled against Keating in his operation of Lincoln Savings, which American Continental bought in 1984 with $51 million from Drexel Burnham.

There are other interconnections between Marvin Warner, Lindner and Keating. Warner's Home State Savings used Keating's law firm for legal work. Also, one of Warner's best and oldest friends and biggest partners, Hugh Culverhouse, Sr., served for a time on the board of Lindner's American Financial.

Regarding Charles Keating, Lindner's spokeswoman said, "Mr. Lindner hasn't even seen him in 12 years. He hasn't had anything to do with him since then."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue May 07th 2024, 01:37 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC