Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"OBAMA-KENNEDY" An Open Letter by Michael Moore

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 11:53 AM
Original message
"OBAMA-KENNEDY" An Open Letter by Michael Moore
http://www.michaelmoore.com/words/message/index.php?id=226

...Senators Biden and Bayh voted for that invasion and that war, the war Barack ran against, the war Barack reminded us was the big difference between him and Senator Clinton because she voted for the war and he spoke out against it while running for Senate (a brave and bold thing to do back in 2002).

For Obama to place either of these senators on the ticket would be a huge blow to the millions that chose him in the primaries over Hillary. He will undercut one of the strongest advantages he has over the Hundred-Year War senator, Mr. McCain. By anointing a VP who did what McCain did in throwing us into this war, Mr. Obama will lose the moral high ground in the debates.

As for Governor Kaine of Virginia, his big problem is, well, Obama's big problem -- who is he? The toughest thing Barack has had to overcome -- and it will continue to be his biggest obstacle -- is that too many of the voters simply don't know him well enough to vote for him. The fact that Obama is new to the scene is both one of his most attractive qualities AND his biggest drawback. Too many Americans, who on the surface seem to like Barack Obama, just don't feel comfortable voting for someone who hasn't been on the national scene very long. It's a comfort level thing, and it may be just what keeps Obama from winning in November ("I'd rather vote for the devil I know than the devil I don't know").

What Obama needs is a vice presidential candidate who is NOT a professional politician, but someone who is well-known and beloved by people across the political spectrum; someone who, like Obama, spoke out against the war; someone who has a good and generous heart, who will be cheered by the rest of the world; someone whom we've known and loved and admired all our lives and who has dedicated her life to public service and to the greater good for all.

That person, Caroline, is you.

I cannot think of a more winning ticket than one that reads: "OBAMA-KENNEDY."

More...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ronnykmarshall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 11:54 AM
Response to Original message
1. I think Michael's Oscar fell on his head.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 11:55 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. Agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 12:10 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. I think there's something to that. Love his films and I am one of 6
people who watched every episode of "The Awful Truth" but his political advisory wisdom has left much to be desired.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 11:58 AM
Response to Original message
3. And to think Moore used to deride the Mumia bunch. He makes
less sense then they do.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lame54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. I'm afraid Obama's choice is going to be less than inspiring
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The_Casual_Observer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 12:01 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. On his basis, he ought to be promoting Ramsey Clark.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SteelPenguin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 11:59 AM
Response to Original message
4. I've toyed with the idea
But she's never really shown an inclination for that direction.

How bout Chief of Staff?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
suston96 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 12:02 PM
Response to Original message
7. A woman on the national ticket? Failed once. So far Democrats have rejected that notion.......nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wvbygod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 12:05 PM
Response to Original message
8. Single issues only win a single issue
Moore needs to engage his brain a bit more.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haakon59 Donating Member (8 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 12:14 PM
Response to Original message
10. Obama-Kennedy, a good idea, but . . .
An Obama-Kennedy ticket? Well, I like the Kennedys and would be happy if they were interested, although I am guessing this is not the case. Personally, I feel the realistic best choice is Mrs. Clinton. Time changes everything and while I agree it would have been best had Mrs. Clinton come out against the war (and the others also, which was Mr Kucinich's position)at this point the primaries are over and we need to win the general election. Mrs. Clinton is extremely well qualified and could add her supporters to a winning ticket.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jbane Donating Member (668 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 12:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. Hey Mike, go make another movie.
You have street-cred there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeaLyons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 12:30 PM
Response to Original message
12. Oh No...
Thank God that's not going to happen.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
eshfemme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-20-08 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
13. Okay, Michael, you completely miss the point of CHANGE. WTF is wrong with the picture
if a Clinton was unacceptable b/c it would be a rule of dynasties only for Obama to appoint a Kennedy as VP? Where the fuck did you get this idea, Michael Moore? You've made some nice points in this debate but this is completely out of left field.

Caroline Kennedy sounds like a nice lady but NO! No Kennedys, no Clintons, no Bushes, just no to concentration of political power in one family.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC