Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why Does VP Pick Have To Be A Politician?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:27 PM
Original message
Why Does VP Pick Have To Be A Politician?
Discuss.








Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. I wish they weren't, actually.
VP has to be qualified to be president. That lets out most politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. According to many dems on this board,
the Veep pick will be the Virgin Mary, cause no one else is pure enough! Seems like any little picadello makes us run to the hills and hide from the Republican onslaught coming. I find it rather comical coming from Democrats who like to complaint that Democrats have no spine......guess it is because those doing the voting of Democrats have no spine either. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Drunken Irishman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #2
8. WRONG! The Virgin Mary is a woman and that would be a slap in the face to Hillary and her supporters
Edited on Tue Aug-19-08 05:35 PM by Drunken Irishman
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #8
16. Yeah, but she's a virgin. No sex scandals. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
offog Donating Member (263 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #2
19. Good point, FrenchieCat!
Dems shouldn't "run to the hills" over "any little peccadillo". I don't care that much about peccadilloes in principle. Conservative peccadilloes kinda bother me because those guys are always trying to label the Democrats as the party of loose morals, and tell everyone else not to fool around. But the Edwards "scandal" doesn't bother me at all.
I remember the big scandal over Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinsky (did I spell that right?). The MSM and pundits were making a big fuss over it and saying that Clinton would be forced to resign any day. At the same time, polls showed that most voters were pretty ho-hum about it.
I was working at a laundromat while all this was going on, and people seem to talk to laundromat attendants the way they talk to bartenders. One day I was chatting with one of my regulars, a young woman who's a devout Christian. We were watching a TV news item on the Clinton/Lewinsky scandal, and she said "Why don't they just leave the poor guy alone?"
The point I want to make is Dems shouldn't panic so much about little peccadilloes because the ordinary voters don't care nearly as much about that stuff as the Repugs would have you believe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Avalux Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. He doesn't. Wes Clark!
He was a terrible presidential candidate with no previous political experience and would make a great VP. :kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:33 PM
Response to Reply #3
5. How about college professor, university president, other discipline, business leader, etc.
I don't understand the assumption about politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Gabi Hayes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:31 PM
Response to Original message
4. good point. McCain would do well to pick someone a little more even tempered than he:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
6. Stephen Colbert keeps dropping hints, you know. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. Why the hell not? Bush and Cheney have lowered the bar so low, anyone would be better.
Edited on Tue Aug-19-08 05:35 PM by Hissyspit
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DainBramaged Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
7. How about a comedian?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:35 PM
Response to Original message
10. Let's make it official--chairman of the board of ExxxxxxxxonMobil. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. Talk about 'Keep Your Enemies Closer.' n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OmahaBlueDog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:37 PM
Response to Original message
12. Strangely, I think that's a more popular Republican notion
In the party where the government can do no right, the notion of a CEO VP from outside politics (Whitman, Fiorina) is quite popular.

He wouldn't take the job for love nor money, but if BO could talk Warren Buffet (D - Omaha, Palm Beach, and many other places) onto the ticket, he'd likely make signifigant headway in GOP circles.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFLforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
13. Because s/he has to prove they can win and hold elected office.
That accomplishment trumps any other experience a candidate may offer.

It's not something anyone can do. In fact it's a talent very few have.

Neither political party would risk running a candidate at the presidential level who lacked those political skills.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:47 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Or steal it. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. The Republicans did in 1952 and it worked out pretty well for them
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFLforever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 06:07 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. That was a long time ago and Ike was elected to end a war.
for which he was more than qualified.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
valerief Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 07:02 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. Police action.
In the United States, the conflict was officially termed a police action — the Korean Conflict — rather than a war, largely in order to avoid the necessity of a declaration of war by the U.S. Congress.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LeftishBrit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:40 PM
Response to Original message
14. Because they'll become president if anything happens to the elected president?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. And...?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrat2thecore Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 10:28 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. It might help to have been in politics - to be - you know, president? -nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
22. Why do politicians have to be politicians? Oh gawd.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tinrobot Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
23. Why do professional golfers have to play golf so well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SheilaT Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
24. And most politicians
are lawyers, so the subset is even narrower.

However, one of the reasons Bush has been so incredibly awful may well be because he got an MBA not a JD. He tried to run this country like he ran every other business he was in charge of, which was to run it to the ground.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 07:11 PM
Response to Original message
25. In the event that the President is unable to carry out his duties...
the Vice President will wear the crown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. An academic couldn't do that? A business leader couldn't do that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 07:12 PM
Response to Original message
26. For the same reason a spare tire has to fit the wheel.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 07:21 PM
Response to Reply #26
27. So a professional diplomat can't be VP?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 08:18 PM
Response to Original message
28. It's a politcal office.
Why do all surgeons have to be doctors?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. That's a falsely equivalent analogy.
Not the same thing at all.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #29
30. Says you.
A medical procedure (surgery) requires a medical professional. Political matters require political professionals. If they weren't politicians to begin with, they will be as soon as they assume the duties of the office.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 09:29 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. There is plenty of history of people serving in public elected office without having been a
professional politician.

You can't become a doctor without a large amount of specific educational process and specific standardized legal certification.

Apples and oranges.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Naturyl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 09:32 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. K, whatever.
Not gonna argue this any further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 09:31 PM
Response to Original message
32. Because of the 2 responsibilities placed on the VP by our Constitution
To become President if the current President is not able to perform his/her duties


To preside over the Senate




Defiantly need a politician for the first one, kinda need one for the second one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 10:30 PM
Response to Reply #32
36. You offer no proof. Why does the President have to be a professional politician?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ramonna Villota Donating Member (57 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-19-08 10:26 PM
Response to Original message
34. That would be
a real change and a goooooood change
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:22 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC