Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary is not planning a coup at the convention

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:19 PM
Original message
Hillary is not planning a coup at the convention
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 01:21 PM by Jake3463
1) She has significant debt. No vendor in the country is going to take her credit.
2) She has no volunteer base. The volunteer base has been absorbed by Obama's campaign and Obama supporters would likely walk en masse if she did this. Re activating her volunteers would take alot of time and with no paid staff alot of effort
3) She has no Field Organizers. See the Obama Volunteers and imagine how people who work for Obama would do if there was a coup. Its taken Obama all summer to hire the people necessary for the GE.
4) You think PUMAs are bad can you imagine what the Obama supporter reaction would be if they believed he won only to have some sort of coup at the convention and there being no justification?
5) She doesn't have the delegates...which should actually be #1.


She would lose and lose miserably. No one walks into a defeat like this. Hillary is not foolish.

Everyone needs to chill about the name being put into nomination thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. No, no. It's standard operating procedures for the
Clinton-haters here at DU to over-react and spew hate like the world was coming to an end whenever something is done for Hillary or her benefit!

I'm amazed that they don't work themselves into having strokes or something!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
46. I love the freeper tactic
Anyone who criticizes Hill/Bill is automatically a "hater." You have learned well, grasshopper. Karl will be so proud.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TheDebbieDee Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #46
54. Rubber and glue and all that!
And even I criticize the Clintons. But I call it hate when people embue the Clintons with superhuman attributes and capabilities. What do you call it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 04:57 PM
Response to Reply #46
62. Yea, they got down with the quickness
Don't forget that if you don't worship at her feet you hate all women.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
roguevalley Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:29 PM
Response to Reply #46
76. yeah. you can't have a contrary opinion based on your own perceptions
around her on this woman. I don't believe anything about anyone anymore. I just know who I will be blaming if this blows up in our faces. I am SICK of the namby-pamby bullshit. I expected better from a woman if she ran and lost. Don't lecture me about brokered conventions. I was around for them but never at any of them were the stakes this high. Put me on ignore if you don't like MY OPINION. On this board, they are equal and we are all entitled to them. Or so they say.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MyNameGoesHere Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #46
108. Says the person who responded in a freepish way. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
iconicgnom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 09:27 PM
Response to Reply #1
92. Thanks for starting it off!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ccharles000 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #1
95. I agree.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
2. Bingo.
This is the nontroversy du jour.

Collect all of them for an entire month, turn them in to Skinner and win a free Granite Cookie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sybylla Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:41 PM
Response to Reply #2
32. LOL!
What a lovely contest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #2
36. Oh c'mon. How many Hillary-haters have been TS'ed?
THey're all still here.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SidneyCarton Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #36
49. Maybe they forgot to hand in all the box tops?
:shrug:

(Don't look at me, I just post here)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Andy823 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree with you.
What I worry about is her die hard followers, the PUMA bunch, who will try and rally others to do what they can to defeat Obama "after" the convention. These people are really the problem, and putting her name in nomination could cause more problems than one thinks. I think it's a bad idea, and think that it could cause some protesting at the convention that will make the party look bad when it gets played over and over on the MSM shows.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:12 PM
Response to Reply #3
43. PLEEEEASE
stop referring to PUMA as Hillary supporters! THEY ARE NOT! They are a bunch of (r)s, likely buoyed by Rush Limbaugh, whose sole purpose is to split the Democratic Party. So far, at least here on DU, they've been doing a pretty good job!

I, for one, will TRUST the instincts and decisions of Senator Obama and Howard Dean.....Putting her name in nomination, if it is done, will be done only to STOP problems! Please trust them to make the right decision, won't you?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 12:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
100. "played over and over on the MSM shows"
my concerns exactly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
windbreeze Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #100
114. Wait, Wait....
don't we have the right to the same coverage from the MSM as the Rep's get??? when * speaks or appears anywhere, they ciphon out the protestors...in fact, we never see any protestors at all where he's concerned so why should we have to see any at the Dem. Convention??...oh hang on...it's different,
isn't it??? wb
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. Of course Hillary is not planning a coup
It would be political suicide.

Unfortunately, the way she ran her campaign created the situation Democrats are now faced with. Either way, it's a mess.

The only thing to hope for now is that the disrupters are kept at bay and the Convention goes off without a hitch.

With or without Hillary's name in nomination, they are never going to be satisfied.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Metric System Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. YES SHE IS! It's true because the usual suspects keep insisting so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
6. this is going to disappoint a lot of folks
itching for a rumble.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:32 PM
Response to Original message
7. No she is not
And if she is she is pissing in the wind. The majority of the electorate is behind Obama at this point there is no way that will flip at the convention.

She wants a last moment in the Sun and Obama is inclined to give it to her. This Clinton hater is inclined to agree with him.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:37 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Sorry, but Hillary is going to have a lot more moments in the sun. A lot of Democrats--including
Obama--want her on the campaign trail. She is a member of the Senate and Obama will need her vote for legislation. Her supporters haven't left her and she proved in the primaries that she has a lot of them. So expect to see a lot more of Hillary Clinton over the years.

Steve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:54 PM
Response to Reply #8
17. Long as she isnt representing me thats fine
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #8
18. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
jesus_of_suburbia Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:56 PM
Response to Reply #18
38. I'm sure that will work out well for you!
Hillary will win her Senate seat easily.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Enrique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
20. Bill too
Obama as president will need some counsel from Bill.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chloroplast Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #20
83. Obama doesn't need Bill's counsel.
If Obama needs counsel of any sort he'll have a staff as well as a caring wife to bounce ideas off of; Bill can do whatever Bill does.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 12:33 PM
Response to Reply #83
101. seconded.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:22 PM
Response to Reply #8
70. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mamalone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:52 PM
Response to Reply #70
74. but what if we don't want her here either???
I have been so disgusted with her behavior over this primary season she certainly won't be getting my vote... and I honestly don't know one single other person in RL who supports her at this point. I think she'll really have to fight to retain that seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:40 PM
Response to Reply #74
85. Sorry, but that's just wishful thinking. The polls make it clear that you are in a clear minority
Hillary is not considered in jeapordy in NY and is widely expected to easily win re-election.

I have never been more proud of Hillary Clinton. Her "behavior," as you condescendingly put it, has been magnificent. Obama failed to get the delegates needed to claim entitlement to the nomination and needed SDs to put him over. She had every right to contest it all the way to the Convention. Her support for him at such an early stage was historic.

Steve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #85
90. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 12:49 PM
Response to Reply #90
105. You really need to stop with the "Billary" if you want to be taken seriously
That is nothing but a RW-invented meme.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #105
110. It's amazing how much freeper lingo has recently been imported into DU.
And, come to think of it, it all comes from the same few people.

Kinda makes one wonder, doesn't it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 02:47 PM
Response to Reply #110
112. Yeah, it does -- and yeah, it does
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamalone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 09:59 PM
Response to Reply #85
96. Well, I'm not sure what polls you are referring to,
but virtually everyone I know up here has been appalled by her "behavior"... and I'm sorry if that term offends you, but honestly I think it's pretty apt. I live in Upstate NY, mainly white area, and I literally know of not one person who intends on voting for her in the next Senate contest. My parents have been very involved in the NY Dem party for decades and they are actively pursuing "other alternatives" to her even being on the ticket. I don't think there's much doubt she'll have an even harder time in the cities with a higher minority population.

You may be very proud of her and that is certainly your right, but it's the right of us NY'ers to determine if she'll be continuing to represent us in the Senate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #74
89. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
mamalone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 09:20 PM
Response to Reply #89
91. Don't worry.. I won't.
It seems she won't let me, even if I wanted to:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #70
86. Where do we even begin to list all the incorrect things you said?
First of all, you don't know what will happen in the future. Maybe she will be president, maybe she won't. But it is silly to make an absolute declaration when you only get one vote.

Second, nobody is asking "forgiveness." Hillary has done nothing that requires forgiveness and hasn't even hinted that she sees herself as seeking redemption. The people who claim she does are basically haters whose harsh judgments of her were never based on logic or fairness.

Third, you don't speak for all African-Americans.

Fourth, it is inappropriate to refer to "Billary" like she is an amorphous creature with her husband--that's the kind of sexism that has tarnished this election.

Fifth, with no provocation at all, you called me, and all Hillary-supporters, racists. I'm not angry--to whatever extent I am still angry--because Barack "is a qualified black man who took the job she felt she was owed." That was never an issue.

Sixth, Hillary never said, or felt, that she was "owed" the presidency and the claim that she did is nothing more then a smear from a hater. It is your shame.

Seventh. you don't speak for the people of Harlem, which Hillary Clinton won BTW. And you can't "run someone out" of anywhere in this country.

Steve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 09:28 PM
Response to Reply #86
93. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 12:48 PM
Response to Reply #70
104. "Billary"??? oh gods
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #7
44. Good for you!
It only makes sense to trust the political instincts of the nominee and the chairman of the party! They know what they are doing. Thank you for recognizing that!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emilyg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #7
94. My Hillary is not going away. Get used to it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
9. She doesn't want the '08 nomination
but by the same token, I do not beleive she wants Obama to win in '08 so she has a shot in '12.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
10. Let the paranoid, anti-Democratic posters have their way.
We all know Hillary isn't planning anything.

Other than helping Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
11. No coup
The deal has been made, and Bill, Hillary and Chelsea will honor it, because if they don't, they're finished in the party. They may not work as hard as some might like after the convention, but they will all publicly swear commitment to Obama at the convention, and it will be strong endorsements.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #11
45. If you get word
after the convention, that Hillary or Bill have refused to do anything asked of them by the nominee, please let us know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mme. Defarge Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:45 PM
Response to Original message
12. Sage advice, mon ami ...
For the past several days I have been pretty riled up over the Clinton situation. But, since I have no influence or control over this, I believe the wiser course is to trust Obama. Plus, you have made a strong argument that reason will prevail.

After yesterday's tragedy I have had second thoughts about fanning flames.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:48 PM
Response to Original message
13. I've started to wonder if she'll be SUPER supportive at the convention
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 01:56 PM by Skwmom
b/c she knows she needs Obama supporters (in particular the black vote)in 2012 to even have a chance.

If it's not about forcing her way on the ticket, or taking the nomination, then I think she'll use it as a platform to woo the Obama voting block. Any sabotaging of Obama in the general election can't be done on camera. Then if Obama loses they'll argue "look how she supported him at the convention, we didn't sabotage him in the general election." So they might really put on a show of support at the convention so they can argue that they had nothing to do with Obama losing. Of course, plenty has already taken place which hurts his chances and I'm sure that will continue (loss by a thousand paper cuts).

Plus, if she acts like a real trooper, it can be used to enrage her supporters even further (as in look at all Hillary has done for Obama and he didn't even pick her for his VP or something along those lines).


Time will tell.

On edit: In addition, if something were to happen to Obama she would need his supporters to rally behind her as a replacement nominee.

The only thing I'm certain of is the Clintons are doing what is good for the Clintons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
14. Jake I am going to take it one step further
Anyone that is freaking out about her name on the ballot must think that Obama is either:

A) Stupid
B) Easily Manipulated
C) Both

They have zero confidence in the leadership of the nominee and therefore I have to wonder why they are supporting him.

Obama was my last choice and I have more confidence in him then most of his more zealous supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:52 PM
Response to Reply #14
16. The problem lies in that Hillary was a worthy opponent
McCain isn't. Which is also a problem because some Obama supporters are underestimating the crafty old guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Obama had no choice
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 02:04 PM by IWantAnyDem
Only Hillary Clinton and 300 delegates can put her name in nomination. Obama has no say one way or the other.

Obama had to be supportive of her deciding she wanted her name placed in nomination. He had no other choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Franks Wild Years Donating Member (687 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #14
22. I agree.
Look, I am of the belief that Hillary Clinton ran, and I say this as diplomatically as possible, a very disappointing campaign in many different ways.

However, Obama has agreed to her name being placed in nomination. The Clintons wouldn't be given such prominent roles at the convention if their actions were in question. Obama is an exceedingly savvy operator and don't anyone let it be in doubt that if Hillary or Bill do ANYTHING underhand to harm his chances while in Denver he can finish them politically. If Hillary were to sneakily attempt to win the nomination, he has the profile to destroy her aspirations once and for all. The Clintons may have behaved in a way unbefitting Democrats of their status in the Primaries, but they are not that stupid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:52 PM
Response to Reply #22
34. Actually it doesn't really matter if Obama" agrees" to have her name placed in nomination.
Hillary has to "agree" and she has to sign with 300 delegates which apparently she did. Her name would be placed in nominastion whether he wanted her to be or not. She is there as a candidate because she "earned" the position of being placed in nomination. That being said, a roll call vote is just a "tradition" . They are upholding traditon and paying tribute to her candidacy by doing so. This means nothing else. I am glad they are upholding the tradition because to not do so would make the Democrats look bad and as thought they were dissing the first credible female candidate.

And I don't think this is anything about anyone being "sneaky" or "savvy" on either side. It is simply trasdition and a wonderful one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #34
52. But if he thought anything underhanded was going on they wouldn't be a big part of the convention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
saracat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:38 PM
Response to Reply #52
53. That is a good point. I just meant neither hillary or Obama were doing anything
but upholding a tradition by having the roll call.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:55 PM
Response to Reply #53
58. Exactly!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:59 PM
Response to Reply #52
60. Doesn't matter what Obama thinks. If she wants her name placed in nomination
and she has the 300 delegates, that's what happens. If, in fact, they KNOW she's going to be divisive, there's still nothing that can be done to stop it.

Those are the rules.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
juajen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #22
61. Bullshit!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:06 PM
Response to Reply #14
64. That's the part I just don't get!
It's clearly Obama's show. There is no way it will be otherwise. He is sharp as a tack! Thinking Hillary is anywhere NEAR doing something like this is an insult to Obama.

I guess it's ok to insult Obama in the name of hating Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 12:58 PM
Response to Reply #14
109. I said the same thing to Haruka last night -- and that the one pushing this are PUMAS
Because, they sure as hell don't believe in party unity. Jesus.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arkansas Granny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
15. Thanks for laying it out so clearly. Very well put.
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RBInMaine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
19. She would NEVER risk looking so foolish. RELAX EVERYONE.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
olkaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 01:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
111. How did you so quickly forget the post-indiana primary speech?
When Hillary was still saying things like "onward to the White House" when it was CLEAR it was over.

I have zero faith in them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born_A_Truman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:18 PM
Response to Original message
23. So how does this work?
Her speech is Tuesday night and her name goes into nomination Wednesday night. Does she NOT support Obama during her speech Tuesday night?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. They will have the roll call on Monday
At the opening of the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:21 PM
Response to Reply #23
25. Of course she supports him Tuesday night
her name on the ballot is symbolic. People here are freaking over NOTHING.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Born_A_Truman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:25 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. Not freaking--just asking a question.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Marrah_G Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:32 PM
Response to Reply #27
29. Sorry- I didn't mean you specifically
There are just a dozen or so folks having fits over this today.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AlinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:09 PM
Response to Reply #25
42. It might help somehow with closure for her voters and may end up with more unity.
She will be speaking the night before and if nothing else, I expect she will tell everyone to get with the program. I'm thinking she and Obama have it planned to come off with a show of solidarity. Note, I was P.O'ed at her for the ads that painted Obama as being less than McCain, but I still have some hope that she doesn't want McCain's Supreme Court justices.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
The Magistrate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:25 PM
Response to Original message
26. Indeed, Sir: Well Said
The idea is preposterous, and taken seriously nowhere.

It persists only for the same reason horror movies are popular: some people enjoy titillating themselves with illusory fears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:34 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Well put
"It persists only for the same reason horror movies are popular: some people enjoy titillating themselves with illusory fears."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Donald Ian Rankin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
78. "Just when you thought it was safe to go back in the voting booth"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Helmet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:29 PM
Response to Original message
28. if she can't be the nominee she wants the party to lose
so she can run again in 2012
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
1Hippiechick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:50 PM
Response to Reply #28
33. My thoughts exactly. Glad to hear someone else thinks this way.
And, like so many others, for what she has done to divide the party, I will never support her for anything ever again. She was my candidate of choice UNTIL Obama came on the scene, and then it was a no-brainer, for me. All this BS about putting her name on the ballot as a symbolic gesture is just that--BS. She had a RESPONSIBILITY to CONCEDE and get behind her supporters and tell them in no uncertain terms how important it is that the Dems take the WH, and that means throwing 100% support beind the party nominee Obama--which is the Party way. Did she do that? Hell, no. And what do we have here? Her "egging" them on, USING her supporters to say that this is what "they" want, blah, blah, blah. My husband never has liked the Clintons and now I know why. I hate that they are even appearing at the Convention. If these are friends, who needs enemies?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mamalone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:54 PM
Response to Reply #33
75. thank you...
I probably wouldn't have used the words you did... but I pretty much agree with every single one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
terrya Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:35 PM
Response to Original message
31. Allow me to recommend this. Thank you for your post.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
35. It's not Hillary I worry about
I'm sure Hillary isn't planning anything but I do question the wisdom of this since firstly, it'll surely remind everyone of how bitter, close and vitriolic the primaries were and secondly, it gives the diehard Clinton "supporters" (i.e. the PUMA idiots who aren't so much pro-Hillary as really hate Obama) the opening to create chaos.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #35
40. Fear, thy name is "Perry Logan"
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 03:01 PM by YOY


Prophet...you can NOT be afraid of that, can you? It's like being afraid of the homeless guy on the corner screaming bible verses...actually I think they may very well be the same person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Prophet 451 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:02 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. LOL! OK, you convinced me! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
YOY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
37. Yup!
:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
A-Schwarzenegger Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 02:57 PM
Response to Original message
39. OK, not a coup, but what about a putsch?
:*
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:27 PM
Response to Original message
47. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #47
51. Billary????
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 03:33 PM by Beacool
Would it be OK to call Obama names?

Hillary does not need to grow up, some Obama supporters on the other hand......

She is only asking to have a roll call, something to which she is ENTITLED, just like every other candidate who came before her. Obama will still be the nominee.

What's the big problem??????

What worries some of you so much????
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 12:54 PM
Response to Reply #51
106. I've seen it in at least seven posts in this thread using that term
Niiiiiiiice.

In thought the Primaries were over?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beacool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 06:20 PM
Response to Reply #106
118. For some, a year from now they'll still be going on about it.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:10 PM
Response to Reply #47
66. This crap certainly is getting old! So you might consider knocking it off...
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 05:10 PM by Juniperx
This is symbolic, FCOL!! Obama is in full agreement! You are insulting Obama by not going along with his plan!!

If you can lay the hate aside long enough to think about how this process actually works, you would see this is an attempt at UNITY!!! Clinton is going to throw her full support behind Obama... and that support has a lot more weight if she is named in the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
48. Pay no attention to the loser behind the curtain!
Forget that her campaign relied heavily on jackassery during the primary. Forget her invocation of racism and assassination. Lucy is putting the football down for Charlie Brown to kick and this time promises to behave. Riiiiiight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PresidentObama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:46 PM
Response to Reply #48
55. The jackassery during the primary was on all sides, and it's over.
Hillary is on board with Obama.

You're paranoid.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. Obama ran a positive campaign -- Hillary used the "kitchen sink" strategy. Try the math again.
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 03:52 PM by AtomicKitten
Hillary did the THREE EVENTS when she finally ran out of states and nothing for two months until ONE EVENT in Nevada last week. She has ONE EVENT in Florida scheduled for the entire month of August. She isn't breaking a sweat.

We won't even go into Bill's bullshit non-endorsement last week.

The Clintons are poison and cannot be trusted.

And you are enabling their pathology by refusing to see it, which is to say the least not an endearing quality but I'll refrain from qualifying that further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ampad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:03 PM
Response to Reply #56
63. So true
I hope she doesn't plan on running for the nomination again. She may think that people will forget her dirty campaign but the media will trudge all that shit up to refresh our memories.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #63
72. After keeping her name on the MI ballot saying it "wouldn't count for anything,"
after entering into an agreement with all the presidential candidates and the DNC that Michigan and Florida would not count, she back-stabbed Obama by pretending to be the Protector of the Vote insisting those votes be counted as voted.

Nope, I'm going to have to go ahead and call bullshit on any pretense of innocence on her part. She has demonstrated she not only will do whatever it takes for the nomination, she is prepared to sacrifice any semblance of integrity she might have once had in the process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 12:28 PM
Response to Reply #72
98. She calls for unity with one face and whines to be in roll call with the other.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 12:27 PM
Response to Reply #63
97. I don't think Americans will forget her games and lies for a long time.
I suspect she'll have a hard time keeping her Senate seat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LostinVA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 12:55 PM
Response to Reply #97
107. No she won't -- and she shouldn't lose it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 03:04 PM
Response to Reply #107
115. She's given us no reason to keep her in any elected position.
Just saying that you don't want her to lose her seat isn't a reason.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Raineyb Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 03:48 PM
Response to Reply #97
116. I certainly will be looking for an alternative in 2012 for Senate n/t
Regards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #55
102. What jackassery did Obama pull during the primaries? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Whisp Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #102
117. Shame on you, Hillary Clinton! Shame on you!
Edited on Fri Aug-15-08 03:57 PM by Whisp
I guess you missed that.

when he was all bug eyed and pointing at a flyer.
not one of his finest moments.

but seriously, there is NEVER an answer for what you asked. we are supposed to believe that Obama conducted himself in the same shameful way Hillary did.

History is already being rewritten. You'd think she was some kind of goddess of fair play or something by the glowing posts about her here. I'll never trust him again - she showed me her true colors bright and clear during the primary. her Iraq war vote was enough for me to doubt her but the way she led her primary with the dirty shit she threw was despicable beyond words.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David Zephyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:32 PM
Response to Original message
50. Thanks for your OP. Everyone needs to chill indeed.
And the roll call will create unity, not hurt it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:52 PM
Response to Original message
57. "See the Obama Volunteers and imagine how people who work for Obama would do if there was a coup"
I do agree with that statement.

However, I don't trust Hillary Clinton one bit. I'm not saying she's planning a coup, I'm saying you can't believe a word she says and who know what the hell she'll do next.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #57
59. She's practicing her surprised face in the mirror when her minions refuse to accept Obama as nominee
and raise a holy shitstorm on her behalf.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:08 PM
Response to Reply #57
65. I agree with you. I don't trust her, and what's going on is camera-hogging at best...
and certainly doesn't help us move beyond the primaries. They had the unity event, she gets to speak at the convention, those should be more than enough.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:14 PM
Response to Original message
67. So, it's pointless ego-stroking of a drama queen? Got it.
Edited on Thu Aug-14-08 05:16 PM by TahitiNut
:shrug: I guess the other losing candidates don't need their egos stroked. Figures.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JuniperLea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:18 PM
Response to Reply #67
68. Hardly
It's a gesture, a symbolic gesture. Any attempt at a coup now would forever ruin Clinton's chances at any race she might consider. How else to get all the Clinton and Obama supporters together? Clearly something ceremonial and final is needed, and that's what this is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
beac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:25 PM
Response to Reply #67
71. TahitiNut,
I LOVE you!



(please don't tell my husband ;) )
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rebel with a cause Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:40 PM
Response to Reply #71
79. So do I!
I don't have a husband, but relax because we can agree it is just not in that way. ;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #67
82. If anyone needs some cheering up right now, it's John Edwards
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phx_Dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:20 PM
Response to Original message
69. I am not worried that she's planning a coup.
Frankly, she wouldn't be able to pull it off. If she couldn't win the nomination during the primaries, she's not going to be able to steal it at the convention. What irks me is the Clintons and all of their dramatic bullshit (the leaked memos, the video of Hillary, the interview with Bill, the PUMAs, her name in nomination) is diluting what is a hugely historic nomination for the Democrats, the African American community and the country. But that's okay, because Bill and Hillary's wounded pride is so much more important.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phred42 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 05:49 PM
Response to Original message
73. Bullshit - Obama....watch your back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Top Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
77. She better get he crew in check because this will not be tolerated
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Populista Donating Member (16 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 06:41 PM
Response to Original message
80. But..but.. Maureen Dowd said Clinton is evil
Let's believe Dowd, ok?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 12:29 PM
Response to Reply #80
99. And for once I agree with Maureen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Orsino Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:05 PM
Response to Original message
81. Does grandstanding to get on the ticket count as a kind of coup?
Isn't this move designed, in part, to make the selection of any other running mate look cheap and risky?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Motown_Johnny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 07:15 PM
Response to Original message
84. Agreed, she is setting herself up for 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 08:08 PM
Response to Original message
87. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
greguganus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 12:44 PM
Response to Reply #87
103. 2012 will not be hers. People will not forget 2008. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ikojo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Aug-14-08 09:05 PM
Response to Original message
88. I put NOTHING past Hillary
She and Bill Clinton feel she is ENTITLED to the presidency. She's already said that only she and McCain were ready to be president on day one. A McCain administration would not upset her in the least.

I DO NOT trust Hillary AT ALL.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
snooper2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
113. Of course not..
She just wants 5 more minutes of fame...look at me! look at me! you love me don't you!

clap clap point point...and then it will be one step closer to being over...28 years of Bush and Clinton plutocracy in the White House...


been a LONG time coming
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Top Cat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Aug-15-08 07:02 PM
Response to Original message
119. Don't count her out until the last vote hs been counted
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 12:07 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC