Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Latest Zogby battleground poll, Nader can screw us big time

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:18 PM
Original message
Latest Zogby battleground poll, Nader can screw us big time
Arkansas
Kerry 48%
Bush 46%
Nader/? 6%
EV - 6

Florida
Kerry 50%
Bush 49%
Nader/? 1%
EV - 27

Iowa
Kerry 52%
Bush 45%
Nader/? 3%
EV - 7

Michigan
Kerry 51%
Bush 45%
Nader/? 4%
EV - 17

Minnesota
Kerry 50%
Bush 45%
Nader/? 5%
EV - 10

Missouri
Kerry 49%
Bush 49%
Nader/? 2%
EV - 11

Nevada
Kerry 48%
Bush 46%
Nader/? 6%
EV - 5

New Hampshire
Kerry 43%
Bush 51%
Nader/? 6%
EV - 4

New Mexico
Kerry 50%
Bush 44%
Nader/? 6%
EV - 5

Ohio
Kerry 46%
Bush 51%
Nader/? 3%
EV - 20

Oregon
Kerry 54%
Bush 43%
Nader/? 3%
EV - 7

Pennsylvania
Kerry 52%
Bush 44%
Nader/? 4%
EV - 21

Tennessee
Kerry 50%
Bush 48%
Nader/? 2%
EV - 11

Washington
Kerry 53%
Bush 45%
Nader/? 2%
EV - 11

West Virginia
Kerry 42%
Bush 49%
Nader/? 9%
EV - 5

Wisconsin
Kerry 51%
Bush 46%
Nader/? 3%
EV - 10

North Carolina
Kerry 50%
Bush 49%
Nader/? 2%
EV - 15

Colorado
Kerry 49%
Bush 46%
Nader/? 5%
EV - 9

Arizona
Kerry 50%
Bush 47%
Nader/? 2%
EV - 10

Virginia
Kerry 48%
Bush 49%
Nader/? 4%
EV - 13
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NoBorders Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Correction: Nader can't screw us
People who vote for Nader can screw us. Need to put the responsibility where it is due, but your point is well taken.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:23 PM
Response to Original message
2. We pick up VA, NC, CO, Tenn., AZ
I don't see a problem at all here.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:26 PM
Response to Original message
3. I see no listing of Maine
Nader, as of right now, on the ballot. He pulled 6% in 2000 and could be a factor. Latest polls I've seen show a close race in the state.

Warning, don't be too sure tat Kerry will carry ME.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dudley_DUright Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:34 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. But Maine proportions electors according to the percentage
Edited on Tue Aug-24-04 05:35 PM by Dudley_DUright
of the vote. It is not winner take all.

The candidate who wins in a state is awarded all of that state’s Electoral College votes, except in Maine and Nebraska where the electoral may be split.

http://bensguide.gpo.gov/9-12/election/electoral.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VirginiaDem Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:39 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. It's a weird split though
There are two districts, one worth 3 votes and the other worth 1. If memory serves, Kerry is way up in the 1-district. So, theoretically, Nader could screw us in Maine. I think this is highly doubtful though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fujiyama Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #9
33. A possible scenario
is Kerry winning the first district (1EV), winning the overall popular vote of the state (2EV), but Bush winning the second district (which Gore barely won). THat would allow Bush to take 1 electoral vote.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:42 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. Yes I know, but
* could have enough of a margin coming out of the 2nd district to keep his total above Kerry's in the 1st.

Also, what a lot of non-Mainer's don't realize is that this yr we have a question on the ballot (Ques 1) that will bring out a larger number of conservative voters than normal. Question 1 is a property tax relief measure (modeled on CA's Prop 13) that is BIG among the "less taxes, less government" crowd.

The split of EVs maynot happen if * squeaks by on the popular vote total.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VirginiaDem Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:51 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Now I'm more confused than usual
* could have enough of a margin coming out of the 2nd district to keep his total above Kerry's in the 1st.

What does this mean? How does it work? Sorry and thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. It's proportional, right?
so if * wins the pop vote in the 2nd by 3 votes and kerry wins in the 1st by 2 votes, guess who wins it all?

At least that is my understanding, but I could be wrong....but look at this article in the Bangor Daily News.....

http://www.bangornews.com/editorialnews/article.cfm?ID=429915

It's about the challenge to Nader's ballot, but it will shed more light on the situtation up here
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VirginiaDem Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 06:09 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. here's a quote I found
on this website about Colorado's proposed ballot initiative to use proportional representation:
http://www.mydd.com/story/2004/8/3/144612/0610

"I think the Right Thing to do here is what Maine does, and allocate two EVs by the statewide popular vote, and the rest by the the popular vote in each individual CD."

I'm still confused.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 06:18 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. End of confusion....I hope LOL
Lets say Bush wins pop vote in 2nd by 3 votes....Thats 1 ev for *

Kerry wins pop votes in 1st by 1 vote...that's 2 ev for Kerry

But because Bush won the TOTAL pop vote he gets another 2 ev's

Total 3 EV's Bush, 1 EV Kerry.

Net effect is that Bush wins Maine.

But it gets better:

Come the actual Electorial College vote in the House, that lone Kerry Electorial voter could throw his vote to Bush (because more folks up here voted for Bush than Kerry) and the effect would be a sweep of Maine's EV for Bush.

Remember Electorial College voters are not "bound by law" to vote the way the results indicate. This is why each party has slates of EC voters and not just a general, take out of the closet every four years group of people.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NewYorkerfromMass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:35 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. conventional wisdom in Maine is that it will break for Kerry
big time. It is reliably Dem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
maine_raptor Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. I live up here, JK had a 10 point lead once, not now n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Green Lantern Donating Member (277 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-04 12:07 AM
Response to Reply #14
34. Up until a few years ago
Maine was hardcore red. There is still a strong streak. Remember, both Congressmaen are currently Dems, but both Senators are Republican women. Interesting anomaly. And Maine has had two independent governors in the last (roughly) 28 years, and Maine punched in 19% for Perot a few years back.

The state is still up for grabs. But the DP in Maine has initiated a review of Nader signatures with regard to ballot access. (see stopnader.org-sorry-don't know how to do the link thing.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
4. Nader's #'s seem too high
especially in Arkansas, Virginia, and West Virginia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RobertSeattle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. How can Nader get more votes than last time?
I've never consider any 2004 poll with Nader with more that 2% bogus
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bush was AWOL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-04 12:13 AM
Response to Reply #5
36. How in these polls you ask...well he can get more votes
by Bush supporters saying they will vote for him in order to keep his sorry ass in the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beetwasher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Are Those NH #'s Reversed?
They gotta be, I Coulda Sworn I saw different results on another thread...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattNC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:49 PM
Response to Reply #8
15. you're right - electoral-vote.com has JK up by that amount n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #15
22. sorry I messed up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Guava Jelly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:39 PM
Response to Original message
10. Nader isnt on the Ballot in Missouri
he missed it via not enough Real signatures
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
movonne Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
11. What date is this poll???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #11
23. today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
VirginiaDem Donating Member (574 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
12. My first time to see the new numbers for
Colorado, NC, VA and AZ. These are great numbers! As for Nader, for the states he does eventually get on the ballot for, he will do much worse than he did in 2000. It is possible, though, given what we saw in Florida. He won't screw us anywhere by getting five percent of the vote. I doubt he gets more than 2.5 percent in any state.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 05:59 PM
Response to Original message
18. Where did you get the Colo., Ariz., Va. and N.C. numbers?
I knew they were coming out today. Wow!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
still_one Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 06:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
24. Zogby
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 07:08 PM
Response to Reply #24
27. Is there a link?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zynx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #27
32. Yeah, I'd like to see the link too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 06:11 PM
Response to Original message
20. Some of this polling contradicts a lot of other polling out there.......
I think Zogby is way off. Every other poll under the sun has Bush up in Arizona. Every other poll under the sun has Kerry up in NH. No other pollster has Nader having this kind of impact across the board. Kerry now up in North Carolina and Tennessee? Please, someone link me to another pollster who has Kerry up in those states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lancdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 07:07 PM
Response to Reply #20
26. The N.H. numbers are reversed
Kerry is up there by 51-43. And the Nader numbers are all wrong. No Zogby poll has Nader getting more than a couple percent, most less. Tennessee is very close in other polls, and other polls give Bush a small lead in Arizona.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PaDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 08:27 PM
Response to Reply #26
30. Thank you for clearing that up for me.......
makes perfect sense on New Hampshire. I figured something was up with the high Nader numbers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blondeatlast Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
25. Nader failed to make the ballot in Arizona.
And damn if we aren't going BLUE.

YIPEE!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Endangered Specie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-04 12:10 AM
Response to Reply #25
35. I hope he doesnt make it here in NC... We are SOOO close to turning BLUE
too!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
fishface Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 07:10 PM
Response to Original message
28. But is he on all those ballots???
That's the real question.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yankeedem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 07:29 PM
Response to Original message
29. Nader vote= undecided
Look at these figures, they don't leave an undecided alternative seemingly. If you aren't sure, you say Nader. Most of these people will break our way when it matters- especially since Nader won't be on the ballot in many of these states.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Aug-24-04 08:36 PM
Response to Original message
31. I HAVE NO FAITH IN POLLS OF SELF SELECTED RESPONDENTS
NT
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LisaL Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Aug-25-04 12:14 AM
Response to Original message
37. Nader is a problem
Edited on Wed Aug-25-04 12:16 AM by lizzy
But he absolutely refuses to get off the ballot.
So, the best strategy would be to win over Nader voters, I guess.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 02:46 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC