:eyes:
In WH race, strong is often wrong
By MARK J. PENN | 8/4/08 6:51 PM EST Text Size:
The image of Michael Dukakis in a tank haunts the Democratic Party
Photo: AP
In many recent presidential elections, Americans have had a choice: pick the candidate they think is a stronger leader or pick the candidate they believe is right on the issues. Almost always, they have chosen the stronger leader — even though they have often come to regret that decision.
Strong and wrong or weak and right — that is the choice that Republicans have tried to present to the voters. They will try it again this year; as conditions in the economy worsen and with two wars in the background, Americans are again looking for a tough leader for tough times.
We hear less and less about who the voters would rather have a beer with or ask to baby-sit for their kids — the voters have had it with those kinds of choices.
So take key issues such as the economy, health care and Iraq. Once again, the Democrats lead on those issues by large margins. Americans don’t want their troops in Iraq for a hundred years or even for two years — they want to see the war end and the money spent on military action in Iraq going instead to help relieve our country’s problems at home. They favor alternative energy over drilling and nuclear energy, and they see the health care system falling into increasing disrepair.
.
.
.
Full article at:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0808/12287.htmlI'm tempted to think that if Mark Penn is suggesting something, Obama should do the exact opposite.
But I must admit, some of the advice is sound.