Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Obama May Be Presumptuous, But Would It Kill Dana To Get His Facts Straight?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DeepModem Mom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 10:25 PM
Original message
Obama May Be Presumptuous, But Would It Kill Dana To Get His Facts Straight?
Radar: Barack Obama May Be Presumptuous, But Would It Kill You To Get Your Facts Straight?
By Alex Balk

The Barack Obama Presumption Watch continues! Today, the Washington Post's Dana Milbank—considered to be one of the nation's funniest reporters by a group of people who also consider Mark Russell and the Capitol Steps to be on the cutting-edge of political humor—excoriates the candidate in a piece titled "President Obama Continues Hectic Victory Tour." What's Milbank's problem with Obama? Basically, he thinks he's all that!


Milbank: "The 5:20 TBA turned out to be his adoration session with lawmakers in the Cannon Caucus Room, where even committee chairmen arrived early, as if for the State of the Union. Capitol Police cleared the halls -- just as they do for the actual president. The Secret Service hustled him in through a side door -- just as they do for the actual president. Inside, according to a witness, he told the House members, 'This is the moment . . . that the world is waiting for,' adding: 'I have become a symbol of the possibility of America returning to our best traditions.'"


There's only one problem: According to a Democratic source, "His entire point of that riff was that the campaign IS NOT about him. (The Post) left out the important first half of the sentence, which was along the lines of: 'It has become increasingly clear in my travel, the campaign, that the crowds, the enthusiasm, 200,000 people in Berlin, is not about me at all. It's about America. I have just become a symbol...'"

Puts things in a slightly different light, right? In the same vein, Milbank notes that "Obama was even feeling confident enough to give British Prime Minister Gordon Brown some management advice over the weekend. 'If what you're trying to do is micromanage and solve everything, then you end up being a dilettante,' he advised the prime minister, portraying his relative inexperience much as President Bush did in 2000."

That certainly does sound presumptuous, unless you consider the fact that Obama actually said it to Conservative opposition leader David Cameron, who, despite Brown's best efforts, is not yet prime minister. So instead of a junior senator lecturing a sitting head of state, you've actually got two gentlemen who may very well become their nations' respective leaders discussing the ways in which they'll avoid the mistakes of their predecessors. Which, in my book, counts as planning, not presumption....

http://radaronline.com/exclusives/2008/07/barack-obama-presumptuous-president.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
BrklynLiberal Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dana Milbank is a halfwitted twit.
I am at a loss to explain his presence on Countdown.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hissyspit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 10:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. Who the fuck cares whether he's being presumptuous, anyway?
Somebody has to lead this damn country away from the abyss and it sure as shit isn't going to be John W. McCain.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. As Wonkette says...Milbank does not read blogs.
He said in this video Wonkette filmed at a bar somewhere....that if anything important happened, someone would let him know.

http://journals.democraticunderground.com/madfloridian/2426
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
4. Yes, it would kill him to get his facts right..
dana milbank thinks he's untouchable and doesn't have to report facts only mediawhore propaganda.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC