|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 02:13 PM Original message |
Polls are using incorrect methodology. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lancdem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 02:19 PM Response to Original message |
1. Great post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 02:20 PM Response to Reply #1 |
2. There are more Dems than there were in 2000 now I think. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Feanorcurufinwe (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 02:23 PM Response to Original message |
3. Yep |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Awsi Dooger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 02:28 PM Response to Original message |
4. Party affiliations can be misleading |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 02:32 PM Response to Reply #4 |
5. In 2000, only 11% of Dems voted Repuke. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Awsi Dooger (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 02:42 PM Response to Reply #5 |
8. I made a faulty assumption |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DeadHead67 (529 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 02:36 PM Response to Original message |
6. AGAIN, Show me the money ! I'll show you the votes. . . |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Tarheelhombre (224 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 02:39 PM Response to Original message |
7. And 2000 was a year wherein Democrats were not energized |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dick_Tuck (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 03:58 PM Response to Original message |
9. There's more under the radar than you think.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Zynx (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 04:59 PM Response to Reply #9 |
11. Likely voter models are horribly flawed. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Dick_Tuck (65 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 08:51 PM Response to Reply #11 |
12. I'll give you that... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
King Coal (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon Aug-23-04 04:02 PM Response to Original message |
10. Did you ever take a stats class? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue Apr 30th 2024, 08:18 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC