Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

TPM: House Judiciary Committee Votes to Hold Karl Rove in Contempt--20 Ayes, 14 Nayes!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 10:11 AM
Original message
TPM: House Judiciary Committee Votes to Hold Karl Rove in Contempt--20 Ayes, 14 Nayes!
In Contempt Vote on Karl Rove, the Ayes Have It



By Kate Klonick - July 30, 2008, 10:50AM

The House Judiciary Committee has just voted to hold Karl Rove in contempt for failing to respond to a subpoena to the committee.

The final vote was 20 ayes and 14 nays. With Rep. Hank Johnson (D-GA) voting "absolutely, 100% aye."

In a memo on the Full Committee meeting, Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) summarized the facts surrounding Rove's refusal to even appear before the committee and assert executive privilege:

Mr. Rove has refused even to appear before the Committee and assert whatever privileges that he believes may apply to his testimony, relying on excessively broad and legally insufficient claims of "absolute immunity" - never recognized by any court - in declining to appear.

http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/07/in_contempt_vote_on_karl_rove.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
wordpix Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 10:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. YAY! I vote aye, too and back the majority! Rover, we're coming after you, you lying skunk POS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ClassWarrior Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
2. That's great news... but is it INHERENT contempt?
If so, watch for this on your teevee screen:



NGU.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #2
8. That IS the question!
Now some I've heard claim they can't do it since they no longer have a place in the congress to lock those arrested for inherent contempt up. If that is the case, I think we should make sure that isn't the obstacle. That is an EXCUSE not a reason. That problem could be fixed very quickly if there's a will to do so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 10:14 AM
Response to Original message
3. So what will the follow up be??

Another strongly worded letter, or some real action?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InNeedOfUserName Donating Member (101 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 10:15 AM
Response to Original message
4. Sorry for Highjacking! Breaking news: Obama to House Dems: If Sanctions Fail, Israel Will Likely St
I'm tooo new to start a thread:

Obama to House Dems: If Sanctions Fail, Israel Will Likely Strike Iran

http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2008/07/obama-to-house.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
caledesi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Distraction alert! nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mvd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
6. Hooray!!
I put Rove on the same level as Cheney in being complicit in all of this. :bounce:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jul-30-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. k and r
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 03:36 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC