Never ask a question you don't know the answer to. (Kerry and FEC)

[Proud2BAmurkin]

Kerry's campaign knows the answer and that's why they asked for the investigation.

Bush* will be covered in Swiftboat sh*t by November 2

[blm]

1. As a prosecutor Kerry would never proceed with any case he felt was flimsy

and without enough evidence.

[Zynx]

4. Indeed. That's why I have confidence that he has something here.

[ibegurpard]

5. I can't imagine that you would be incorrect on this

It would be foolhardy to make this move if they didn't have something substantial to go on, which makes me think there has to be some fire with this smoke.

[senseandsensibility]

8. That's a good point

Thanks for pointing that out. The facts in the NYT article were devastating, the campaign probably knows a lot more.

[demosincebirth]

2. I hope so.

[katusha]

3. let us pray you are right

i think you are. what would make this even better would be if indictments came down tommorrow in the plame case too. :-)




:-)

[bringbackfdr]

6. This is a great first salvo

But the attacks on Shrub's campaign, its methods and its absolute disregard of the truth have to continue. It has to reach the point that CNN will actually begin giving balanced reports on this entire episode instead of the mindless reporting they have been doing, which does nothing but make Kerry seem defensive and make the Shrub thugs seem like they have something.

[michigandem2]

7. yeah they got PROOF..they aern't going to get caught

in a web of lies..they know the truth and they have it...so this is a big deal..he wouldn't of filed if they weren't sure...

[blondeatlast]

9. That's the first rule of litigation, and Kerry was a superb prosecutor. nt