Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Press all in a Twitter over Gen Clark's statement that getting shot down does not make you a foreign

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
thepurpose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:14 AM
Original message
Press all in a Twitter over Gen Clark's statement that getting shot down does not make you a foreign
policy expert. Poor McCain. Morning Joe starting there crap right out the gate with Mika not believing Gen. Clark is going there.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
chimpymustgo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:18 AM
Response to Original message
1. Since the primary ended, Mika has been useless. She giggles and acquiesces to Joe.
I really don't think she has the brains or the spine necessary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thepurpose Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I can't believe Willie Giest is the voice of reason out of all people.
Even though he didn't push back on Andrea's stupid comments. I really didn't expect him to say anything other than agree with the other two.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #2
21. it is like Mika is merely a caricature of liberalism (the pretty shrinking violet)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:25 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Exactly what I was thinking.
I understand that she believes in having a non-confrontational approach to the morning news, but she just lets Joe walk all over her no matter what he thinks and says.

Also, it's not like this is the first time that Clark has said this. He even said it on their show. A variation of his talking point that McCain's war experience does not translate into good foreign policy formulation.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ladjf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
15. I think she could do better than that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JamesA1102 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 01:35 PM
Response to Reply #1
54. Joe's on vacation
And it seems whenever he's not there she ratchets up the criticizem of Obama. Last month when Joe was out she spent three days flogging the Rev. Pflagger story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:28 AM
Response to Original message
4. OTOH, one cannot equate John McCain as the reincarnation of General Dwight Eisenhauer.
McCain does have a resume that includes leading the troops into and through D-Day, across the European Theatre during a world war, and having a role in prosecuting a peace treaty from the military side.

And how about the double standard? John Kerry had more experience in Vietname on his resume and yet he hadn't done enough to validate himself as a worthy candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polmaven Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #4
43. Sorry, spelling police time....
General Dwight D. Eisenhower
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
no_hypocrisy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 01:14 PM
Response to Reply #43
51. Sorry, I was spelling in German (on autopilot today). My bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DFW Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #51
59. Es besteht Haftbefehl gegen Sie!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. Wes Clark is absolutely right...truth hurts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 10:01 AM
Response to Reply #5
12. yeah. I think everyones amazed a Dem would say
something negative even if it's truthful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #5
17. He is right, but I have a feeling Obama is going to throw Clark under the perverbial "bus".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I would hope he does NOT...in the name of the political game he is trying not to play.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TBF Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:24 AM
Response to Reply #17
29. I hope not. Wes Clark sounds like he'd be a great VP. I like that he has the courage
to tell the truth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 01:28 PM
Response to Reply #29
52. Agree completely - the guy's got brass balls, that's for sure, something we need in a VP . . .
although WC is not my first choice. But a fine choice nonetheless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 12:18 PM
Response to Reply #17
44. Nope, he shouldn't. That's why the RW wants. That's why they are attacking Clark so much.
They are trying to remove him from Veep consideration.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
InAbLuEsTaTe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #44
53. As they say . . . the truth hurts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:44 AM
Response to Original message
6. Wasn't Bush's father shot down as well?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
liberal N proud Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:52 AM
Response to Original message
7. So are they proposing that all future presidents have to be shot down?
Just because someone flew a plane and it was shot down, does not mean we OWE him the oval office?

Likewise just because he sat in a POW camp, does not mean we OWE him the presidency and I am sick and fucking tired of the GOP and Right Wing media making is sound romantic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Kahuna Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 05:56 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. Or that all shot down vets or former POWs are qualified to be president? nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 04:09 PM
Response to Reply #7
57. So I guess this is another entitlement campaign,,,
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
muffin1 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 06:06 AM
Response to Original message
9. Where the fuck was the press
when the repukes were shitting all over John Kerry? Dumbass repukes were wearing band-aids, implying, and yes, saying straight out that Kerry was a coward. Wes Clark makes one statement (which is true, btw), and the MSM wants to crucify him. Jesus, it's way to early to be sick to my stomach.
:(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
bluethruandthru Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 01:13 PM
Response to Reply #9
50. I'm tired of the double standard!
The media had better portray this incident exactly as it was said. Clark honored McCain's service and heroism...but said it didn't translate into leadership experience.

They keep trying to spin it that Clark trashed McCain's service. We've got to call them on it. That's not what he said.

I think we all were too quiet when they trashed Kerry and it cost us dearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sparkly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 06:18 AM
Response to Original message
10. It's amazing, isn't it?!?
He went out of his way to praise McCain's service and make his point crystal clear, yet all we're hearing (starting from the RNC, mysteriously - not) is that he "attacked" and "demeaned" McCain's service!!

:mad:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Eurobabe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 06:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. Pat Buchanan all but acknowledges that the US is a Bush Dictatorship
Edited on Mon Jun-30-08 06:53 AM by 48percenter
""HE" (asshat) has all the power, he is the decider," Katrina Vandenheuvel was all over him for that remark. I've only been home for 3 days and I am ready to flee this country again. :eyes:

There is a poison over AmeriKKKa and the press is fanning the flames of war with Iran. Sick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
13. They can't believe someone would attack McSame
I heard them this morning.

Obama doesn't have any military service, so how can they attack McSame?

Where was this fucking outrage when the right wing tore into a decorated war veteran versus a fucking twit who was AWOL and snorting blow while others were serving?

The media is unfuckingbelievably transparent in their complicity with the reich wing.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 10:15 AM
Response to Reply #13
14. Clark can say things that few Democrats will risk saying
He can say them because he has the record to back up his words, but also, simply put, because he is fearless. He knows full well that the right wing and the media will come after him for discussing the limits of McCain's military qualifications to be Commander in Chief. They came after in in 2003 also when he forcefully opposed Bush over the Iraq war, and unlike the reasoned arguments Clark used against McCain, the Right went straight for character assasination against Wes Clark.
media
Someone has to do it, so Clark stepped forward to take on McCain around his supposed strength in service to Obama. Now watch all the knives directed at Wes Clark. He deserves our backing on this for telling an unpopular truth. Clark said nothing disrespectful about McCain's military service, unlike what the Right said about John Kerry.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. I'm game - and it's lunch time.
Who should I write?

Got some email addys for the worst offenders of this smear?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #20
24. Politico gave it a harsh spin
Edited on Mon Jun-30-08 11:11 AM by Tom Rinaldo
Here is their story:
http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/11425.html

and Andrea Mitchell said his comments were "dumb" on MSNBC's show "Morning Joe", and that meant he wouldn't be on the short list for VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Clark2008 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 12:20 PM
Response to Reply #24
45. What war did Mrs. Greenspan serve in?
:eyes:

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #14
58. You could tell in that campaign that..
the GOP was really upset when Clark entered the race because they started sending out BoB Dole and he couldn't even control the anger he had for Clark. I knew then for sure that Clark was the right one..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MasonJar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 10:49 AM
Response to Original message
16. I hope Wes is the VP choice. He is amazing on defense and he was a Hillary
supporter; he is also one fabulously intelligent and fearless advocate for what is right. No one puts Wes down with impunity, which fits nicely with Obama's attitude.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:03 AM
Response to Reply #16
22. If this storm around his comments grows
Obama is not going to be able to put Clark on the ticket. If he puts such a "media pariah" on his ticket that will change the narrative for the entire race and take the focus away from the issues. 24/7 outrage...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:16 AM
Response to Reply #22
27. 24/7 outrage about nothing
Umm, that's what we already have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phoonzang Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:18 AM
Response to Reply #27
28. Well, unless it's something McCain said
Edited on Mon Jun-30-08 11:18 AM by Phoonzang
Then he gets a free pass. There's a double standard for Obama and anyone connected to him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:48 AM
Response to Reply #27
36. Yeah, imagine what they'll do if Obama chooses somebody else for VP.
The same thing they'll do anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:32 AM
Response to Reply #22
31. That is the media intent;, to rule fair points against McCain off bounds
If we give in to this slippery slope it leads to not being able to be critical of the American President in time of war. It leads to not being able to be critical of a war because that shows disrespect for the men and women sent to fight in it. This is the media plan to boost John McCain.

If a democrat says something truly dumb, he or she will get heat over it. That happens in any campaign. Obama wishs he had chosen other words to describe bitter people clinging to guns and religion for example. You ride it out when that happens, but this isn't that at all. Here a Democrat spoke the truth, in a firm but respectful manner.

Clark did not challenge McCain's heroism, patriotism, or military service. Clark pointed out the real limits of McCain's experience in preparing him to be President of the United States, bucking the conventional wisdom that being a POW made McCain a national security expert. The media wants Democrats to coddle McCain with kid gloves as if he were the reincarnation of IKE, but he isn't and that is factually true. Everything Clark said is factually true and if Demcorats are afraid to say that then McCain will continue to be treated as if he were Ike.

As VP candidate Wes Clark would get plenty of direct air time to make his points, and he makes them very well indeed. Watch the tape of his Sunday interview yourself. Clark called McCain a hero, he was never disrespectful. The VP candidate has to be skilled at roughing up the opposing Presidential candidate. Do you think Dick Cheney was Mr. Nice Guy? McCain will keep trying to puff up his resume with or without Clark taking him on around it. Far better that we have a Democrat with credability stand up to that type of hero worship based puffery. Otherwise Democrats are conceding that McCain is an expert without putting up a fight. The media wants to scare Democars into that stance by attacking the messager carrying the truth. Clark can handle it if given the chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 10:59 AM
Response to Original message
19. I read yesterday that heroism is in volunteering to serve...NOT in the results thereafter...
makes sense
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:51 AM
Response to Reply #19
37. Then where were they when John Kerry (two volunteer stints in combat) was being trashed?
What about Al Gore, who volunteered to serve in Vietnam? Going back further, how much did the press cover McGovern's military service? Mondale's? Jimmy Carter's? They all served. McGovern was a pilot too - who managed not to get shot down.

All my life I've heard this "liberals are wimps and conservatives are war heroes" crap and it is crap! Compare the military records of just the Democrats I listed above with the current crew of chickenhawks wrecking the country this very minute.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #37
38. I agree and with the statement I read..but it is too forethinking for most of Americans.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 12:12 PM
Response to Reply #38
42. That's pathetic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 01:45 PM
Response to Reply #42
55. my point was made quickly, I see.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yardwork Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #55
56. I hope you know that I'm agreeing with you!
I meant that it's pathetic that so people can't understand the simple fact that many Democratic leaders have military experience, while many Republican leaders avoided it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Supersedeas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:05 AM
Response to Original message
23. Corp Shills are GRASPING for ANYTHING, something to make it competitive
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Overseas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:15 AM
Response to Original message
25. And the Corporate Media were so strong in defense of Kerry's millitary experience, huh? //eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:16 AM
Response to Original message
26. Man, Clark is so far the leader in the Veepstakes (IMO)! Attack, attack!!!! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rowdyboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:28 AM
Response to Original message
30. Are all POWs qualified to be president or just the ones who dump their 1st wives to marry heiresses?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:35 AM
Response to Original message
32. They ruthlessly enabled the SwiftBoat lies of Kerry, but are Shocked, SHOCKED, I tell you
that someone would dare question a non-Democrat's war bona fides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #32
34. Yeah, even thogh Clark never questioned McCain's bona fides
All Clark did was set the record straight on the type of national security experience John McCain that doesn't have. He said absolutely nothng negative ab9ut McCain's courage, service, or patriotism.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
33. I am willing to bet that the Obama campaign is watching this media reaction very carefully--
both to see whether Clark's creds as a military guy actually help inoculate him when he criticizes McLame (uh, so far, they're not--the media is siding with McLame), and also to see what is considered "too far" when discussing the relevance of McLame's service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #33
35. That's like giving the MSM the steering wheel to decide where the campaign should head
We alredy know their answer. They put John McCain on a pedestaq in the first place. How do you think they will reqct to any effort to tqake him off of it? They won't roll over and accept it without a fight. And if surrender as soon as they fight against any effort to look at McCain's reqal record rather than the myth about him, we are simply letting them peddle that myth unopposed. That is not how you win elections.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #35
40. I don't know if Obama's campaign is going to adjust any strategy
or not consider Wes for VP on the basis of the MSM reaction--I'm just saying that it's a useful guide as to how it's going to go whenever any Democrat tries to make the argument that McCain's service doesn't necessarily imbue him with Presidential qualities or foreign policy know-how.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 12:07 PM
Response to Reply #40
41. Clark is acting like a lightning rod on this one, drawing enemy fire so to speak
It was predictable that the first Democrat to climb out of the trenches to engage McCain on his so called foreign policy expertise was going to become an immediate target. I see the point you are making, of course it is useful data for the Obama campaign to study where fire comes from in response. Sometimes you need to deploy a decoy to find out the tactics the opposition is going to hit you with.

Sometimes someone has to take a hit for the team. The outrage blow back was predictable, but the alternative to facing it was to allow the McCain myth to go unchallenged. We can not allow the Republican candidate to have foreign policy expertise bestowed on him unfairly by the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 11:53 AM
Response to Reply #33
39. But we knew this would be the reaction
This is the same media that basically forced Obama to leave his church.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 12:24 PM
Response to Reply #33
46. So far I am not pleased
Edited on Mon Jun-30-08 12:36 PM by Tom Rinaldo
"Obama: I will never question others' patriotism"
By JENNIFER LOVEN, Associated Press Writer
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080630/ap_on_el_pr/obama;_ylt=As9GGyjqJkFaCzhLL5R6gX9snwcF

..."Obama said that patriotism "must, if it is to mean anything, involve the willingness to sacrifice" and sought to distance himself from Clark's remarks without mentioning them.

"For those like John McCain who have endured physical torment in service to our country — no further proof of such sacrifice is necessary," Obama said. "And let me also add that no one should ever devalue that service, especially for the sake of a political campaign, and that goes for supporters on both sides."

The comment drew loud applause.

Separately, in a statement, Obama spokesman Bill Burton said, "As he's said many times before, Senator Obama honors and respects Senator McCain's service, and of course he rejects yesterday's statement by General Clark."


So which part of Clark's statement does Obama reject? Was it this:

""Because in the matters of national security policy making, it's a matter of understanding risk. It's a matter of gauging your opponents, and it's a matter of being held accountable. John McCain's never done any of that in his official positions. I certainly honor his service as a prisoner of war. He was a hero to me and to hundreds of thousands and millions of others in Armed Forces as a prisoner of war. He has been a voice on the Senate Armed Services Committee, and he has traveled all over the world. But he hasn't held executive responsibility. That large squadron in Air- in the Navy that he commanded, it wasn't a wartime squadron. He hasn't been there and ordered the bombs to fall. He hasn't seen what it's like when diplomats come in and say, 'I don't know whether we're going to be able to get this point through or not. Do you want to take the risk? What about your reputation? How do we handle it-'"

Or was it this:

"Bob Schieffer: I have to say, Barack Obama has not had any of those experiences either, nor has he ridden in a fighter plane and gotten shot down. I mean-

GENERAL WESLEY CLARK: Well, I don't think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down is a qualification to be President."

http://securingamerica.com/node/2993


Does Burton think riding in a fighter plane and getting shot down IS a qualification to be President? Does anyone think that Wes Clark questioned McCain's patriotism in any of his comments?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TwilightGardener Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #46
47. I don't think Wes was getting slammed in Obama's comments, because
it's clear he didn't question McLame's patriotism. Wes's comments were his informed opinion as a military officer--I don't think he expects Obama to necessarily publicly agree with him. Military people can criticize each other, and Obama wants to stay out of that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #47
48. Self Delete, dupe. n/t
Edited on Mon Jun-30-08 01:09 PM by Tom Rinaldo
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-30-08 01:07 PM
Response to Reply #47
49. I understood the dance Obama did. By itself I'm fine with it.
Edited on Mon Jun-30-08 01:07 PM by Tom Rinaldo
But the quote from Obama's campaign spokesperson was much more blunt in saying that of course Obama rejects Clark's statement. In my opinion there were better ways to handle it that would still have given Obama strategic distance. Something as simple as repeating that military service is valuable in developing and showing leadership, and that General Clark's reply was merely a literal answer to a question asked of him which any reasonable person would have to agree with on the face of it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 06:11 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC