Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

McCain calls for $300 million prize for better car battery

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:50 PM
Original message
McCain calls for $300 million prize for better car battery
Sen. John McCain on Monday called for a $300 million prize to whoever can develop a battery that will "leapfrog" the abilities of current hybrid and electric cars.

Citing high oil prices, the Republican presidential candidate said he wants his offer to "deliver a power source at 30 percent of the current costs."

" $1 for every man, woman and child in the U.S. -- a small price to pay for helping to break the back of our oil dependency," McCain said during a town hall-style meeting at California's Fresno State University.

McCain said the new automobile battery should have "the size, capacity, cost and power to leapfrog the commercially available plug-in hybrids or electric cars."

http://www.cnn.com/2008/POLITICS/06/23/campaign.wrap/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:53 PM
Response to Original message
1. why not just 300 million
for alternative energy research? I mean that would do something rather than hope someone does something
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buck Rabbit Donating Member (999 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
31. Well this way only the big boys who can fund their own R & D can play.
You wouldn't want some university researcher to get that kind of payoff.

This way we can give 300 million to a corporate giant for inventing something they were trying to invent anyway that would be worth billions of dollars without the reward.

"No Billionaire Left Behind", the McBush motto.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Johonny Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 02:58 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Big boys don't R&D
The thing is few companies do that kind of huge scale R&D. Most private R&D went out in the 80s. Mostly by backward funding large science you make sure it won't happen. Most large scale R&Ds are at least partially funded through the government. It seems to me McCain created a way to talk about solving the problem without really doing anything about it. Compare that to Obama's statements for having an Apollo like program to generate alternative fuels and you really see how silly McCain's idea is. No private company is going to have an Apollo like effort in any field of science.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 06:00 PM
Response to Original message
2. Odd idea for a conservative
Edited on Mon Jun-23-08 06:01 PM by Jake3463
If they were so in love with the "Market" you'd think that the reward for inventing such a battery would be incentive enough :evilgrin:

BTW how is that other incentive you guys got going. 50 million for Bin Laden?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bad Thoughts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 06:03 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. The Market IS working on it
McCain wants the public to believe that this reward will spark innovation. However, car manufacturers have already started pushing industries to redesign the battery so that its performance would meet the expectations of American consumers of what a car would do. The market already saw a need, and is responding to it. McCain $300 million is just a giveaway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 06:06 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. You guys? I seriously hope you are not implying that I am a conservative, a republican, or
that I support McCain over Obama :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 06:13 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. No
The fact a so called conservative is calling for a Government reward from taxpayer money for something by their economic theory the market should demand.

Trust me the Fundy's aren't going to like this and he alienates his base even further and further.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:20 AM
Response to Reply #6
19. Oh, thank you. I apologize.
I missunderstood.


I liked the idea one person in this thread posted regarding the American Citizen's owning the patent to the battery. Though that would NEVER happen. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hippo_Tron Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
4. Oye, I listened to Newt Gingrich propose this "brilliant" idea once
Now that I think about it, I can't quite remember why on earth I would ever go to see Newt Gingrich speak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #4
33. I wasn't aware he had an engineering background . . .
Didn't he found Ovonics?

Oh, sorry - never mind!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 06:14 PM
Response to Original message
7. Is this like the Lottery?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 06:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. How about $300 million prize and the American people get all rights
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Honu one Donating Member (118 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 08:43 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. Now that's more like it
The person/company that does invent this will make plenty off it, why do tax payers need to add $300M to that?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:44 AM
Response to Reply #12
23. I thought you would like that idea, hell make the prize tax free
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
musicblind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 03:12 AM
Response to Reply #8
18. I bet you meant that as a joke. But that's actually an interesting idea.
America PEOPLE getting to own it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:47 AM
Response to Reply #18
24. No joke I was dead serious, why the fuck should we give some greedy sons-o'-bitiches
...fascist types corporate control over a concept that would benefit all of humanity? Free lifelong batterries to drive everything, set it up like Social Security and let Wall Street and reTHUGlicons eat their hearts out :wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stopbush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
9. My guess? Cindy owns a patent on a car new battery.
The $300MM will come in handy when John retires...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
whistle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:55 AM
Response to Reply #9
25. That's why France had the guillotine and used it well during the French Revolution
....they eliminated nearly all of the parasitic useless aristocrats who not only took advantage of the masses but stole all of their production and ideas. This struggle of the classes has gone on for millennia and it is time that the blight of the privileged classes who contribute nothing to humanity but misery and suffering is purged once and for all
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
flpoljunkie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
10. Can you imagine the media ridicule of Obama has proposed this silly gimmick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onetwo Donating Member (439 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 07:36 PM
Response to Original message
11. Pandering gimmick. Gimmicky pandering.
That's all this guy knows...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
13. Who owns the patent if American taxpayers are putting up the $300m prize?
Edited on Mon Jun-23-08 09:02 PM by Kristi1696
Or, is there any requirement that the winner go on to manufacture said battery?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AZBlue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 09:55 PM
Response to Original message
14. Ummm....wouldn't someone invent something like that just for the profits alone?
I mean, it seems it would be worth a lot more than $300 million over time. Isn't this just a pretty empty idea, like all his others?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doremus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 10:22 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. BINGO! n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 03:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Big prizes increase the number of risk takers and encourages entrepenuers
to put more money up front.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 02:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. I kinda like the idea.
I wish the goal were more ambitious though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mokawanis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 04:39 AM
Response to Original message
20. Give me just 10 million and I'll dedicate my life to acheiving it n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Neshanic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 08:45 AM
Response to Original message
21. "Watch this Rocky while I pull a number out of my ass!" Why 300 mil?
Why not a billion? Why would someone offer it up for 300 mil like another poster said when they could make more teamimg with a company?

He's such a maroon.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Higher Standard Donating Member (499 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:02 AM
Response to Original message
22. Won't do it for the sake of the country or world? How about money?
Whoever develops this is already going to make a fortune off of it. How irresponsible is it to additionally offer $300 million of taxpayer money as a "reward"? And how exactly is McCain going to pay for that $300 million? This is a cynical proposal and pandering at its worst.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 11:01 AM
Response to Original message
26. Why not just buy John McCain a copy of "Who Killed The Electric Car?"...that's about $20
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 12:03 PM
Response to Original message
27. A good plan. Obama needs to counter; he can't let McCain outflank him on energy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Higher Standard Donating Member (499 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:10 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. What, should he top him?
$400 million plus a night out with Scarlett Johannson?

It's a gimmick. There's so much money to be made on patenting such an idea that anybody who could make it work would do so without the additional incentive of a ton of taxpayer dollars which McCain would have to find a way to pay for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 02:35 PM
Response to Reply #28
34. No. He should emphasize a more-comprehensive, yet similarly 'punchy' plan.
And superprize bounties do, indeed, attract/increase interest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JimGinPA Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
29. Someone Should AskHim How That Bounty On bin Laden Worked Out
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:31 PM
Response to Original message
30. It's being worked on rapidly already. This is another pander, to make
it look like he's proposing something. The technology is being worked on and they are making breakthroughs. The market will pick up on anything that is developed. No need to spend taxpayer money on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hatrack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 01:40 PM
Response to Original message
32. So, what budget will this slice of pork come from, Senator?
What will you cut to come up with the requisite $300 million?

Also, who in hell would want to forgo royalties & patent rights in exchange for $300 million? If this putative breakthrough is all that big, it's going to be worth one hell of a lot more than $300 million.

Pathetic, pandering shit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrenzy Donating Member (941 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 02:52 PM
Response to Original message
35. How about..... 1 billion, gagillion, fafillion, shabolubalu million illion yillion dollars. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blue_Tires Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
37. imaginary money -- he knows no one will cash in on it
Edited on Tue Jun-24-08 03:34 PM by Blue_Tires
who else remembers the $100 million reward for Bin Laden right after 9-11 which is still unclaimed?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 07:58 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC