Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The GOP understands that powder is not meant to be kept dry.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 03:20 PM
Original message
The GOP understands that powder is not meant to be kept dry.
Sometimes a great blog post just hits you in the face, and tells you the painful truth.

From Unfogged:

What do you call an opposition party that refuses to oppose?

These remarks cut through all the bs and get straight to the truth.

Practically the entire record of the Democratic Party as a group over the past seven years is one misguided instance after another of "keeping their powder dry" in anticipation of a time when they held a stronger strategic position. By all indications, the Democratic Party will enter 2009 with the White House and significant majorities in both chambers of Congress. I'm soliciting odds on the following three predictions:

1. This pattern of behavior is so deeply ingrained in the Democrats that they will continue to quake in fear of a wildly unpopular party that just imploded under its own stupidity and hubris.

2. Despite a far weaker electoral position than the Democrats ever had to deal with, the GOP will have no problem behaving like an effective opposition party.

3. The GOP understands and is willing to demonstrate that "powder" is not a finite commodity that must be conserved and that, in fact, using your powder magically generates more powder.


This is the legacy of the New Democrats using the policies of the DLC/PPI, more concerned about irritating the opposition than standing up for what is right for our country.

Last December the PPI said it was time to grant immunity to the telecoms.

This week our Democrats are dutifully complying.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 03:58 PM
Response to Original message
1. #3. hammer, meet nail.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. To grow your powder, you have to use it....the GOP knows it.
:hi:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ulysses Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. what we call powder is actually good will.
Which we seem congenitally inclined to waste, as a party. Sit on it, and it doesn't get wet - it disappears.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Coexist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:28 PM
Response to Original message
3. that is so true.
I wish they would stop being so damned careful and concerned and just do what is right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cascadiance Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 06:05 PM
Response to Original message
5. What is called "Keeping your powder dry" is really doublespeak 4 "Continuing to stay non-committal"
to not lose my corporate backers who want thing, when my voters want another!

This will continue OVER and OVER and OVER and OVER and OVER again!!! UNTIL we make it THE focused issue to shut down the K-Street lobbyist crowd, put in place public campaign financing, and take down our "government for sale" signs every place!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 11:10 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Non-committed. You are right.
That's why we are in Iraq with all the dying and tragedy. They would not commit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
6. Spineless or craven? You be the judge
The had the Telecoms at the negotiating table for this bill!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madfloridian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 09:49 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. Sure they did. The ones not at the table were us.
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 12:55 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC