Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UPDATE! from MSM!! UPDATE!!!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 08:33 AM
Original message
UPDATE! from MSM!! UPDATE!!!
Ethanol is now bad. There have always been "some doubt" about it*.
Obama has ties to it too.

You are now re-informed



http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=389x3504555

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3363448&mesg_id=3363448

*-not that MSM ever let you know about that starting back about November of 2006 (freshly repackaged and reintroduced in February 2007 for the beginning of the Presidential runs ...in Iowa)


__________

I am not giving cover to or and excuse for Obama-it stinks to high heaven-but it is interesting that MSM (RNC) now is flinging this against the wall to see if IT will stick.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 08:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. Doesn't almost every population from a state with a large rural population support ethanol?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 08:47 AM
Response to Reply #1
9. Yes. Every goddam one.
Indiana, Illinois, Iowa, Minnesota, etc etc.

The problem isn't ethanol; the problem is taking away food to produce ethanol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
2. NYT has a hit piece about it too today
Damn farmers from those flyover states! Why won't they just let us have Brazilian ethanol!

:crazy:


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 08:37 AM
Response to Original message
3. Ethanol is bad.
Edited on Mon Jun-23-08 08:39 AM by cornermouse
Just not for that reason. If you want I could start listing the them... Basically it's another con job.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 08:45 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. No no no
I'm not listening to them but the problem is that alot of people are-though less than ever before.

I know all about the evils of Corn including ethanol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jobycom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 08:40 AM
Response to Original message
4. We have always been at war with Eastasia.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
underpants Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 08:46 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes but someday, God willing, we will get that Goldstein fella
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 09:27 AM
Response to Reply #4
16. The MSM has warned me that Eastasian's fist bump, and that is how we can
tell their operatives are amongst us. We are so lucky to have MSM to protect and inform us!!!

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
6. Jesus Christ.
Ethanol is bad? Ethanol as a fuel replacement has been in place for decades. It's now bad? The positive and negative aspects of ethanol have been recognized forever. Endorsing an ethanol plant is hardly a bad thing.

We complain about the MSM -- but DU is packed with fucking idiots. Most of us don't know shit from Shinola. The MSM is serving up exactly what we pay to hear, and we never turn a deaf ear to their insanity.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #6
18. Thank you!
Finally, a voice of sanity in all of this.

I chuckle at people who bitch about petroleum, yet also bitch about renewable energy. Perhaps they'd rather live in the stone age?

Ironically, these same people posting this asinine nonsense on a computer. Hope it's pedal-powered.

As I've been saying, the ethanol industry is only in the growing stages considering where it could be some day, with advances in cellulose extraction. I've maintained that the big problem with it is the heavy use of corn. I'm not one of those that think corn ethanol is starving the world. I haven't seen a shred of credible evidence of that. The problem with corn is its low energy yield compared to various grasses (sugar cane, switchgrass, hemp), and the fact that corn is a bitch to grow, is too dependent on toxic fertilizers and pesticides and over time can really screw up the soil. Grasses, on the other hand, grow outrageously fast, need far less water and chemicals and are good rotation crops.

Here's what I wrote about in other threads:

http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3363448&mesg_id=3363601
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=show_mesg&forum=102&topic_id=3363448&mesg_id=3363894

As I've said, we've only scratched the surface as far as ethanol is concerned. I think it can work in the long run, so long as we're smart about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 10:48 AM
Response to Reply #18
21. I laugh at people who think we can keep happily motoring with impunity
Edited on Mon Jun-23-08 11:07 AM by cliffordu
in 1950's fashion using oil, ethanol, pig poop or magic fairy dust.

I wonder if people will ever realize that their fucking cars are killing US, not the planet.

Probably not. I don't believe we are capable of making the changes we need to make to stop killing ourselves.

I can’t wait for the Chinese to add to the problem with THEIR 20 or 50 or 200 MILLION new cars over the next few years. Then THEY can all believe that owning a car is a God-given right and not the perverted, deadly, addictive aberration of the industrial age that it really amounts to.....Cars are the Crystal meth of machines; they make you feel like you are smarter, better looking and more bullet resistant than you really are and all the while they are rotting your teeth and brain. We'll kill millions to drive to the mall.

After 35 years of being nationalized by Saddam, the oil fields in Iraq are being grabbed up by the Usual Suspects - Shell, Exxon-Mobile, Phillips.

Look for gasoline to drop to a thrifty 3.75 a gallon.

Over 4000 Americans dead while grabbing for it, and maybe a million dead Iraqi "Unintended Consequences'.

We're going to hit the Iranians over it, too.

With ethanol, we can just starve people to death. That's easier than war.

Next time they fill up, folks should try to figure out how much blood gets added to the crude to get that summer mix.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Terran Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 08:46 AM
Response to Original message
8. Corn-based ethanol really is bad
and I'm glad that information is actually showing up in the news. Ethanol can be made from grass and old tires now, so growing food to turn into fuel for SUV's is fucking insane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 08:48 AM
Response to Reply #8
10. "growing food to turn into fuel for SUV's is fucking insane" -- EXACTLY!
Thank you for injecting some sanity into this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
high density Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 09:35 AM
Response to Reply #8
20. I agree! A huge con on us all
Edited on Mon Jun-23-08 09:36 AM by high density
It's kind of amazing though that the NY Times nor anybody else had the balls to talk about it until a Democratic presidential candidate was deemed to be "closely linked with ethanol."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
crankychatter Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 08:52 AM
Response to Original message
11. NAFTA is bad.... Mexican Farmers going broke... People can't buy a GD Corn Tortilla in Mexico
Edited on Mon Jun-23-08 08:54 AM by crankychatter
It's bad for American Farmers too

Corn diversion doesn't help the world wide food shortage...

but we're able to accomplish the same thing with Saw Grass... plentiful on the prairie

Ethanol ain't bad...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 09:09 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Ethanol is bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GihrenZabi Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 09:19 AM
Response to Reply #12
14. Don't have the links but...
I believe the cheap problem with ethanol is that it isn't very efficient as a fuel source. It is no replacement for gasoline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cornermouse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 09:28 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. It takes massive amounts of water to make ethanol.
When an oncoming water shortage, that's not a good thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #17
27. I've always wondered about that.
THe amount of water used to make Ethanol must be massive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
GihrenZabi Donating Member (426 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-25-08 08:55 AM
Response to Reply #27
32. That's been getting a lot of press lately...
But it's beyond that. Again, I don't have links, this is stuff I remember from Wired and New Scientist.

Ethanol emissions are purportedly WORSE than gasoline emissions, for one.

It effects food prices, for another.

It's terribly unrealistic for mass usage. The conversion costs are prohibitive.

If we are going to switch to another source of energy, it has to be cheap, clean, and an easier switch. Hence nuclear power, perhaps coupled with electric cars you charge off the grid.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
shireen Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 09:17 AM
Response to Original message
13. what? they just figured it out?
Almost everyone in politics has tied to ethanol. And big oil. And big pharmaceuticals. Those things are like fleas. We should send them all flea collars (except Dennis, Bernie, and a few others).

Don't be so hard on Obama, tho' ... he's smart. He may be using them, but in the end, i believe he'll do the right things as president. I hope.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
endarkenment Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 09:22 AM
Response to Original message
15. Is there any doubt that they just read the daily RNC briefing?
They do not even bother to hide the coordination at this point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 09:33 AM
Response to Original message
19. Does anyone here know the difference between Brazilian ethanol and corn-based ethanol?
To say ALL ethanol is bad is kinda stoopit.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #19
22. Brazilian ethanol is made from sugar cane.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 10:57 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Which is a lot more efficient than corn
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #19
23. Yeap, if we'd grow it the way Brazil does then use the husk for production we'd have better....
...production etc.

But using corn is inefficient
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 11:08 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. Well.....You can either lose food crops or rain forest......
Edited on Mon Jun-23-08 11:10 AM by cliffordu
Why aren't we growing POT for ethanol, again??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Sensitivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
29. Brazil uses sugarcane as input to Ethanol extraction. Much less energy required to produce
Than when corn is used.Has to do w complexity of molecule to break down using current extraction tech.

An entirely different approach to extraction -- enzymatic extraction -- is subject of r and d and some commercialization efforts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zulchzulu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 12:17 PM
Response to Reply #19
30. The tradeoff to Ethanol from sugar cane is awful pollution from the process
I don't if you've been to places where they burn sugar cane, but it STINKS...and worse, the nitrogen oxide levels are high...

Here's the issue addressed about Brazilian production:

...burning cane fields also releases large amounts of nitrogen into the air, making air pollution worse in cane-growing regions. The nitrogen is in the form of ammonia and nitrogen oxides (NOx), which react to create ozone. During the harvest period from April to November, a layer of ash covers cars, and NOx levels double in the main sugarcane-growing state of São Paulo, says study leader Arnaldo Cardoso of São Paulo State University.

http://pubs.acs.org/subscribe/journals/esthag-w/2007/dec/science/ee_Brazil_biofuels.html




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 11:13 AM
Response to Original message
26. The problem with ethanol is that we are using 25% of America's corn to make 3% of America's fuel....

It's DUMB..... with a capital D.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Stuckinthebush Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #26
28. That's bad math
;)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 12:19 PM
Response to Original message
31. I've been saying ethanol was a bad idea since 2006. Unfortunately, I am not important.
:cry:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:06 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC