Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

The MSM is trying to hit Obama hard for opting out of public financing. Dear MSM, screw you.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 06:28 PM
Original message
The MSM is trying to hit Obama hard for opting out of public financing. Dear MSM, screw you.
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 06:31 PM by ProSense

Analysis: Obama chose winning over his word

By LIZ SIDOTI, Associated Press Writer 2 hours, 1 minute ago

WASHINGTON - Barack Obama chose winning over his word.

The Democrat once made a conditional agreement to accept taxpayer money from the public financing system, and accompanying spending limits, if his Republican opponent did, too.

No more.

The chance to financially swamp John McCain — and maneuver for an enormous general election advantage — proved too great an allure.

Obama, a record-shattering fundraiser, reversed course Thursday and decided to forgo some $85 million so he could raise unlimited amounts of money and spend as much as he wants.

"It's not an easy decision, and especially because I support a robust system of public financing of elections," Obama said in announcing that despite his previous commitment, he would rely only on private donations because "the public financing of presidential elections as it exists today is broken."

link


Strange Juxtaposition of the Day

This is up on the Yahoo News site at the moment, a story about Obama opting out of public financing:



But check out the photo used to illustrate the piece:



There is no mention of bin Laden anywhere in the story.


Strange? No, complicit.

Dear AP, check your bias and get your friggin facts straight:

Mr. Obama did not rule out the possibility of accepting public financing, but declared on Friday, “I’m not the nominee yet.”

“If I am the nominee,” Mr. Obama told reporters at a news conference in Milwaukee, “I will make sure our people talk to John McCain’s people to find out if we are willing to abide by the same rules and regulations with respect to the general election going forward. It would be presumptuous of me to start saying now that I am locking into something when I don’t even know if the other side will agree to it.”

Last year, Mr. Obama sought an advisory ruling from the Federal Election Commission to see whether his campaign could opt out of public financing in the primary season and accept it in the general election. It was merely an inquiry, he said, not a pledge to accept the financing.

link


MR. RUSSERT: Senator Obama, let me ask you about motivating, inspiring, keeping your word. Nothing more important. Last year you said if you were the nominee you would opt for public financing in the general election of the campaign; try to get some of the money out. You checked "Yes" on a questionnaire. And now Senator McCain has said, calling your bluff, let's do it. You seem to be waffling, saying, well, if we can work on an arrangement here.

Why won't you keep your word in writing that you made to abide by public financing of the fall election?

SEN. OBAMA: Tim, I am not yet the nominee. Now, what I've said is, is that when I am the nominee, if I am the nominee -- because we've still got a bunch of contests left and Senator Clinton's a pretty tough opponent. If I am the nominee, then I will sit down with John McCain and make sure that we have a system that is fair for both sides, because Tim, as you know, there are all sorts of ways of getting around these loopholes.

Senator McCain is trying to explain some of the things that he has done so far where he accepted public financing money, but people aren't exactly clear whether all the T's were crossed and the I's were dotted.

Now what I want to point out, though, more broadly is how we have approached this campaign. I said very early on I would not take PAC money. I would not take money from federal-registered lobbyists. That -- that was a multimillion-dollar decision but it was the right thing to do and the reason we were able to do that was because I had confidence that the American people, if they were motivated, would in fact finance the campaign.

We have now raised 90 percent of our donations from small donors, $25, $50. We average -- our average donation is $109 so we have built the kind of organization that is funded by the American people that is exactly the goal and the aim of everybody who's interested in good government and politics supports.

MR. RUSSERT: So you may opt out of public financing. You may break your word.

SEN. OBAMA: What I -- what I have said is, at the point where I'm the nominee, at the point where it's appropriate, I will sit down with John McCain and make sure that we have a system that works for everybody.

link



In 2004, the MSM was a free advertising outlet for the Bush campaign when it launched an onslaught in August:

By the time the Swift Boat story had played out, CNN, chasing after ratings leader Fox News, found time to mention the Swift Boat Veterans for Truth–hereafter, Swifties–in nearly 300 separate news segments, while more than one hundred New York Times articles and columns made mention of the Swifties. And during one overheated 12-day span in late August, the Washington Post mentioned the Swifties in page-one stories on Aug. 19, 20, 21 (two separate articles), 22, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, and 31. It was a media monsoon that washed away Kerry’s momentum coming out of the Democratic convention.


More in DU's research forum.

Smeared by Ginsberg

August 27, 2004

BENJAMIN L. Ginsberg is the smoking gun. As national counsel to Bush-Cheney for five years, he has operated continuously at the center of President Bush's political organization. He was James Baker's right-hand man during the 2000 Florida recount challenge.

<...>

Here we have a group of bitter veterans who detest Kerry's leadership in opposing the war 30 years ago and are willing to say almost anything -- frequently contradicting their own earlier statements -- to hurt Kerry's candidacy. They turn to Bush's top political lawyer for advice on campaign finance laws and then to one of Bush's top campaign contributors to fund their attack ads.

No memo trail needs to be found linking Bush personally to Ginsberg and the veterans' group; the connection is apparent.

For far too long this attack has worked to Bush's advantage. Even when Kerry and other veterans were defending his war service effectively…

Ginsberg resigned his Bush campaign position with unintended comedy, saying he was saddened that his role had "become a distraction from the critical issues at hand in this election." Was he suggesting this bogus smear is a critical issue?

...The members of the Federal Election Commission, appointed by Bush and Bill Clinton, have betrayed their office by not reining in groups that are too closely aligned with both campaigns.

But that is not the issue with the anti-Kerry veterans. The issue is Bush -- his refusal to condemn a patently false attack, his willingness to try to reap some political reward on the cheap, his utter lack of leadership in brushing off the role played by his close political aides.

link


Fundraiser Admits Illegal Bush Donations

Associated Press
Thursday, June 1, 2006; Page A10

TOLEDO, May 31 -- A coin dealer and prominent GOP fundraiser at the center of an Ohio political scandal pleaded guilty Wednesday to federal charges that he illegally funneled about $45,000 to President Bush's reelection campaign.

Tom Noe, who also raised money for Ohio Republicans, also is charged with embezzlement in an ill-fated $50 million coin investment that he managed for the state workers' compensation fund.

link


How about Jeb Bush's letter thanking the Swift Liars:




McCain was counting on limiting the amount of money Obama can spend, thereby leveraging the monies that will be spent by the GOP swiftboating 527s on his behalf. McCain has already come out and said he has no control over them. Yeah, like Bush had no control over the Swift Liars (wink-wink).

In 2004, Kerry agreed to public financing. As a result, during the five weeks after the Democratic convention, when the Swift Liars launched their attacks, Kerry was hamstrung by FEC rules limiting the amount of money he had to spend for a GE that lasted five weeks longer than the GOP's. That's the period between the Democratic Convention, which ended July 29, and the Republican Convention, which ended Sept. 2.

McCain: I Can't Stop Outside Groups From Attacking Obama

By Greg Sargent - June 12, 2008, 11:15AM

John McCain has claimed that he doesn't want independent groups to attack Barack Obama, but in a new interview he says that, well, there really isn't anything he can do about it if those groups do decide to swift boat the Democrat:

GOP presidential contender John McCain says he can't control every attack ad aimed at Democrat Barack Obama and fully expects he'll face a similar barrage, sounding the bell for a raucous general election brawl.

"I can't be a referee of every spot run on television," McCain told the Herald in an exclusive interview. "I admire Sen. Obama and his accomplishments, but we all know there are groups who want to attack me."

The Arizona senator's hands-off posture on attack ads by now-infamous tax-free and unaccountable political groups called 527s marks a softening of his view on the negative campaign tactic -- and opens the door to a no-holds-barred five-month scramble.

Via The Page. As McCain says, there are in fact groups who want to attack McCain. But guess what -- Obama's finance team has explicitly instructed donors not to give money to those groups. McCain, by contrast, seems to be saying that he can't control the groups on his side.

If McCain can't stand up to the 527s, how is he going to take on Al Qaeda?



Statement from Obama's campaign:

Trevor and I met at my office on June 6, and we discussed the June 18 panel and then, for 45 minutes, the public funding issue.

I asked him to address a serious of issues of concern to the Obama campaign — such as the McCain campaign's active raising and spending of private money since February for a general election campaign, including for media, while we were still in the middle of a primary contest. He gave me his perspectives — the best arguments he could offer for an agreement on both sides to accept public financing — and it was clear to me that these offered no basis for any further exchange.

Not too long thereafter, John McCain announced he could not and would not "referee" 527 activity.

I am sure Trevor will clarify that I did not at any time counsel him on what choice the McCain campaign would make about accepting or not accepting the public grant.

link



John Kerry: Obama's Public Financing Decision Will Enable Him To Avoid My Fate

Kerry knows what Obama is up against, and he also knows what real campaign finance reform means.

Obama has the right strategy in place





Edited to fix link.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Kerrytravelers Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
1. Excellent research and pulling together of all the info.
I will be bookmarking and using this in the future.


:thumbsup:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Evergreen Emerald Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
2. I don't quite understand why this is an issue
Does it matter whether or not he uses public or private funding? There are rules that still must be followed regarding who can donate and how much. So, I do not quite understand the issue (other than he said he would but changed his mind).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
asjr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. This is the media pushing it., trying to get
people riled up about nothing. Just as the media is making a mountain out of a mole hill about Michelle's dress on "The View."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 06:31 PM
Response to Original message
3. Excellent post.
The bias is showing.

And sorry to others, but Sen. Feingold didn't help our changes. We need Wisconsin, and Feingold talking about how Obama is wrong is totally not helpful. :(
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
politicasista Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 06:44 PM
Response to Original message
4. K & R
Great work ProSense. :kick: :yourock:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepBlueC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
5. He HAS rejected lobbyists' $$$
The whole issue of public versus private financing arose from the awareness of the disproportionate influence powerful lobbies have purchased with campaign contributions. Tom DeLay pretty much turned the government into a retail operation. None of these commentators are mentioning the the fact that Obama HAS made an effort to shut out lobbyists. I thought that was the point of campaign finance reform.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 07:09 PM
Response to Original message
7. Media has no shame
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 07:14 PM
Response to Original message
8. You know why? Because it means that he can win.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 09:36 PM
Response to Reply #8
27. Yeah, much to the disappointment of some people
in the media.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
David__77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 07:16 PM
Response to Original message
9. Doe this save the taxpayers money?
If so, that's a pretty strong leg to stand on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 07:26 PM
Response to Original message
10. If it weren't for the 'media'...
Obama would not need to raise a zillion dollar to counter all their bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sun Jun-22-08 08:06 PM
Response to Reply #10
34. True. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 07:44 PM
Response to Original message
11. Keith has set the story straight and I'm praying the Obama team will hit this hard and fast. The
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 07:45 PM by uponit7771
...Obama team is looking flat and tone deaf on the issue when Keith O gets every nuance right.

All Obama has to say is McSame accepted private funds BEFORE he decided not accept them.

Make the guy sound like the ultimate flip flopper and do it fast.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 07:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
13. Maybe you should listen to Kerry at the link in the OP
I think he's got it covered.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
uponit7771 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 08:03 PM
Response to Reply #13
18. Kerry does NOT address the issue the meme the MsM is putting out! Obama did NOT go back on his word
...to accept public funding IF his reThug opponent did and McSame and McSame went back on the pledge when he saw he needed more money
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 08:10 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. The issue is a debate about intent, not a done deal. They don't accept until after their
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 08:17 PM by ProSense
respective conventions. McCain hasn't gone back on a pledge about public financing. If you read the information from Obama's legal team, Obama is opting out because McCain wouldn't commit to reigning in 527s.




edited word.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 07:47 PM
Response to Original message
12. The problem to be solved is NOT "public" versus "private" funding...
The problem is the CONCENTRATION of funding in the hands of a rich few.

Public financing of elections is ONE *possible* solution to that problem. If it can be gamed, though, it's not a solution at all.

Obama has come up with ANOTHER solution to the problem: private fundraising from a jillion small donations.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeepBlueC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 08:55 PM
Response to Reply #12
20. yep
That really is the point.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 07:53 PM
Response to Original message
14. Regular voters will not pay attention to this "issue".
The MSM can spin this however it wants, but the vast majority of people don't get the intricacies of this issue and simply don't care. Obama won't pay any price. This was a smart move.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 07:57 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Regular voters are not going to hear about this issue (campaign finance reform), they're
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 08:00 PM by ProSense
going to hear about Obama going back on his word, flip flopping and being opportunistic. Ignoring the MSM's ability to make a lot of noise is crazy. Think about the noise they made in the primary over things that shouldn't have been issues.

What was the lesson from 2004: Ignore the MSM? Don't respond? It'll be okay?


edited typo.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
polichick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 07:54 PM
Response to Original message
15. What's the problem - we ARE the public & we're financing!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrreowwr_kittty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
16. A K&R for your thoroughness!
I find the britch-shitting by the MSM over this to be rather amusing. And Obama is getting another $100 from me this evening. :woohoo:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
21. Sorry, but you can't spin fact into fantasy. According to Newsweek, Obama did and said this:
Asked last September on a questionnaire from the Midwest Democracy Network whether he would "participate in the presidential public financing system" if his "major opponents agree to forgo private funding in the general election campaign," Obama checked the box marked "yes," then outlined his vision for the 2008 contest. "In February 2007, I proposed a novel way to preserve the strength of the public financing system in the 2008 election," he wrote. "My plan requires both major party candidates to agree on a fundraising truce, return excess money from donors, and stay within the public financing system for the general election... If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election."

http://www.blog.newsweek.com/blogs/stumper/archive/2008/06/19/the-problem-with-obama-s-public-financing-acrobatics.aspx

That doesn't fit with what he did today, and the MSM has every right to call him on it.

Self-delusion won't make it different.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 09:08 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. They're only "calling" him on it because now he can fight McCain's 527's
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 09:21 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Sorry to disappoint you, but the pledge Obama made is clear
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 09:23 PM by ProSense
McCain had to come to agreement. Part of that was denouncing the 527s. Now you can argue McCain's point, but you don't get to call out anyone for being delusional.




edited punct.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 09:06 PM
Response to Original message
22. dupe
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 09:08 PM by Skip Intro


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Monk06 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 09:10 PM
Response to Original message
24. The FEC doesn't exist. They don't have enough members to hold a quorum.


McCain knows that Obama will outdraw him on
donations. So this is just a tactic to reduce
BO's war chest. If BO goes along with it he's
just indirectly subsidizing McCain's hole in
the shoe campaign
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Duder Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 09:14 PM
Response to Original message
25. MSM are dinosaurs
This blog sums it up well:

'As far as opting out of the public financing system, Gibbs said Obama's breathtaking Internet fundraising machine driven by small donors is the embodiment of all that campaign finance reformers had intended to begin with.

It should be obvious by now, although it apparently is not, that all those well-intentioned efforts to take money out of politics have not worked and never will work. The free speech critics were right. Forget all the feigned outrage from both the Obama and McCain campaigns. From the breakdown of the public financing system to the proliferation of 527 organizations to the rise of wealthy, self-financed candidates, it should be clear by now that money, like water, will find a way around every effort to block its path. All the reforms achieved was to create worse problems than those they sought to solve. It was John McCain's and Russ Feingold's touted reform that gave birth to Swift Boating.

Internet fundraising accomplishes what all those rules about who can give how much and when sought but never achieved. Cheers to the vox populi.'

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/sfgate/detail?blogid=14&entry_id=27439
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 08:12 AM
Response to Original message
28. Analysis: Rejecting public funding won't hurt Obama

Analysis: Rejecting public funding won't hurt Obama

By Alan Silverleib
CNN

WASHINGTON (CNN) -- Sen. Barack Obama's decision to reject roughly $85 million in public financing -- as well as the strict spending limits that would accompany those funds -- did not come as a surprise to most political observers.

The decision was criticized by his opponent, some Democrats and public interest groups.

But does the public really care? Probably not.

The presumptive Democratic nominee has smashed fundraising records this cycle by harnessing the power of the Internet to raise the once unimaginable sum of almost $266 million from more than 1.5 million donors through the end of April.

<...>

McCain's advisers, not surprisingly, have a different take on Obama's decision. They argue that Obama failed to abide by his pledge, as stated in a response to a questionnaire from the Midwest Democracy Network in November, to "aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election." Watch McCain blast Obama's decision »

<...>

Some Democrats and public interest groups were also critical.

<...>

If Obama's campaign is hurt at all by this decision, that damage may result more from a public perception of hypocrisy than from any consternation over a rejection of taxpayer dollars. The McCain campaign has seemed to acknowledge so by criticizing Obama for flip-flopping on the issue instead of trying to defend the merits of public funding.

Unable to compete with Obama's fundraising prowess, McCain may try to claim the moral high ground by portraying himself as a straight-talking underdog, while simultaneously painting Obama as an untrustworthy adversary.

Obama likely will continue to defend his decision by criticizing McCain for failing to rein in the Republican-leaning organizations such those that launched such damaging attacks against Kerry.

more

(emphasis added)
That point in bold needs to be reiterated?

See how the media works? It apparently isn't there job to set the record straight. No mention of that the pledge was to work out an agreement. This is the same he said-he said debate that they allowed to continue with the Swift Liars. Facts be damned.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 08:22 AM
Response to Original message
29. Jake Tapper tries to portray Obama as being on the defensive

Obama Tries to Change the Subject

June 20, 2008 9:11 AM

Comes an email into my in-box: Senators Barack Obama and Hillary Clinton announced today that they will campaign together on Friday, June 27th.

That's all we know right now.

It's not as blatant as "Look over there!" but it's just as clearly an attempt to change the subject from his broken promise on campaign financing.

As is, it seems, the announcement of his new TV ad. Or the fact that he might try to advertise during the Olympics!


"Broken promise"?





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vaberella Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 08:34 AM
Response to Original message
30. I read the posts and I'm wondering what the big deal is. He hasn't even OPTED OUT as they put it.
He just said they'll come to that decision when he's a nominee. Give him a break. He hasn't made a decision on a Veep and he doesn't have to make a decision on this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Catherina Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 05:33 PM
Response to Original message
31. I don't get the fuss about Public Financing or not in this race. K&R
Madfloridian also has a thread I need to find and kick with action links inside.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 05:40 PM
Response to Reply #31
32. The only reason the media cares is because Obama will not
be limited in the amount he can spend countering the smear and spin.

As a result, they're going take every opportunity to translate this into spin the public can understand: Obama broke a promise, which shows a lack of integrity.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Youphemism Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-20-08 06:01 PM
Response to Original message
33. Recommended and...

I'd just like to point out that the universal reaction I see by republicans is that, even as they yap about that "breaking his word" crap, they admit, when pressed on it:

1. He'd have to be an idiot not to do exactly what he's doing.
2. McCain, in the same situation, would do the same thing.
3. McCain, given the different situation that he's in, did something very similar.

The media is really downplaying those points. Again, they want a controversy so they can get viewers. "Broke his word" gets peoples' attention, regardless of the media byte-based lack of integrity required to ascribe that interpretation to a headline.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 05:55 PM
Response to Original message
35. Dems Giving McCain a Big Pass

Dems Giving McCain a Big Pass

I just saw John McCain very gravely lamenting Barack Obama's decision not to accept public financing for the general election campaign and opining about what it says about Obama's ethics and trustworthiness. And I must confess that I'm a little confused why more Democrats are not hitting this preening peacock with the fact that he is as we speak breaking the campaign finance laws and specifically breaking the law on accepting public financing. Having opted into the system and gotten the advantage of it he's now spending freely in defiance of the caps he agreed not to spend over. Not a commitment to Common Cause to try to come to deal, but a legally binding commitment to stay within the public system for the primaries (which, by FEC rules, continues through the nominating conventions).

It's almost surreal that McCain is being allowed to get on his high horse on anything remotely connected to the public financing system.

You can say the press should be hitting him on this. But the truth is that this will only become an issue, if Democrats and Obama-surrogates make it an issue. The guy is not only 'breaking his word' he's breaking the law. But he's so awash in his own self-righteousness that I'm not even sure this counts as hypocrisy -- at least conscious hypocrisy -- since just as is the case with the lobbyists he surrounds himself with I think his self-righteousness makes it all invisible to him.

Here's the video ...

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/archives/201284.php">John McCain Attacks Obama for Opting Out of Public Financing


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-23-08 06:10 PM
Response to Original message
36. Number 1..the US m$$media is always our enemy to
Democracy and number 2..that's a killer pic of Dean and Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ProSense Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-24-08 10:32 AM
Response to Original message
37. Media Pundits on Obama and Public Financing -- Shut the F**k Up
Chris Durang

Media Pundits on Obama and Public Financing -- Shut the F**k Up

Posted June 24, 2008

I can understand the media running with the story of Obama choosing not to opt into public funding for a day or so of programming. And it's true, early in his run he said he was in favor of using public funding, before his candidacy took off and he discovered how much money he could make on the internet from millions of small donors. And is that a flip-flop or a mind change, and is that just the most unacceptable thing in the world? Apparently it was when John Kerry was branded with the flip-flop word endlessly.

Flip-flop. Give up on this word, okay? The opposite of a flip-flopper is someone who sticks to their same opinion no matter what -- such as George Bush and the stupid Iraq war. And John McCain and the stupid Iraq war.

Never ever changing your mind is NOT a good thing. As Stephen Colbert said about George Bush in his famous appearance at the White House Correspondents' Association dinner: "The greatest thing about this man is he's steady. You know where he stands. He believes the same thing Wednesday, that he believed on Monday, no matter what happened Tuesday."

Stop using the word "flip-flopper" as if no one is ever allowed to change their minds. Discuss the meaning of the changed mind, fair enough -- but stop with this infantile phrase.

Plus Arianna Huffington has a very good post Monday on the media's ignoring McCain's own changing his mind about using public funding -- not to mention his taking out loans using the public funding as COLLATERAL, and the illegality of this not being investigated because of obstructionism at the FCC.

But wouldn't Obama be a perfect chump if he looked at the present set-up, and his enormous fund-raising abilities -- and he went, you know, I'm going to be a Good Little Boy, I'm going to meekly stick with what I said at first, and just take the small money (in comparison) that the government gives me? And then said, I'm sure the Swiftboaters and their ilk won't come out and try to slime me. And even if I lose from doing this, still -- I'll get a gold star for good behavior and for never ever flip flopping. And you can all suffer through McCain for four years, and also the Supreme Court will be ruined for the next 75 years. Enjoy! But I didn't flip-flop.

Give me a break. Give all of us a break, and stop boring us with the endless coverage of this story.

more





Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 11:53 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC