Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Rasmussen push polling again. This time in Florida!

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 10:28 AM
Original message
Rasmussen push polling again. This time in Florida!
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 10:30 AM by thewiseguy
Rasmussen latest Florida Poll

McCain 47 Obama 39

Now just like their Ohio poll they provide some RW talking point memo:

There was a time—not too long ago—when calling for offshore oil drilling in Florida was a sure way to lose an election. But, that was back before the price of gas passed the $4.00 a gallon mark. Some political observers think that price increase may be a game-changing event in the politics of the issue and Republican Presidential hopeful John McCain is putting that theory to the test. Early indications are that his call for offshore drilling may boost his campaign in the Sunshine State.

The Quinnipiac poll sampled 1500 people while the Rasmussen poll sampled only 500. Furthermore their polling was done very quickly and over the course of one afternoon! :rofl:

More talking points for Scott on Hannity's garbage show.

http://rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/election_20082/2008_presidential_election/florida/election_2008_florida_presidential_election

Classinc push polling:

Rasmussen Reports conducted a special Florida survey to measure the immediate impact of the offshore drilling issue on the Presidential race. As one part of the survey, respondents were told that McCain favored offshore drilling and said it would bring down the price of gas and oil. They were also told that Barack Obama opposed offshore drilling and said it would not bring down the price of gas and oil. After hearing the views of both McCain and Obama, most Florida voters agreed with McCain--61% said it was likely that offshore drilling would reduce gas prices. Only 34% disagreed and said that offshore drilling would not accomplish that goal.


:puke: :puke: :puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 10:35 AM
Response to Original message
1. How is that a push poll?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
slinkerwink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 10:37 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. because the respondents weren't told it would take 10 YEARS for
off-shore drilling to bring any effect at the gas pump.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. ROFL....That's funny...


Thanks for playing!!

:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 10:52 AM
Response to Reply #3
10. What's so funny?
Why not explain why it's a push poll?

Perhaps you don't know what the term means.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 11:01 AM
Response to Reply #10
16. He doesn't know what he's talking about and has had to resort to ridicule. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #16
19. Wall, garsh, yore smart.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 01:11 PM
Response to Reply #19
20. At least when it comes to political polling I am and you're not. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 01:41 PM
Response to Reply #20
22. well, of course you are.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 11:20 AM
Response to Reply #10
18. Well...


Here's the quote:

"As one part of the survey, respondents were told that McCain favored offshore drilling and said it would bring down the price of gas and oil. They were also told that Barack Obama opposed offshore drilling and said it would not bring down the price of gas and oil."



Let me paraphrase:

If we do what McCain wants, oil prices go down, If we do what Obama wants to do, They won't.

What would you like to do??

Isn't that manipulating the question for a more favorable result in one direction?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MoonRiver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #3
21. You must be very frightened, to be so defensive. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 10:38 AM
Response to Reply #1
4. How is that not a push poll?
Done very quickly. Small sample size. Misleading questions to alter the outcome of the poll.

They did the same thing with Ohio.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. No. For a statewide survey 500 sample size is normal. You use 12-1500 for the whole country.
The speed with which it is conducted also is meaningless.

It's a snapshot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 10:45 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. No its not normal. I have told you that Quinnipiac had a sample size of 1500.
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 10:46 AM by thewiseguy
Nobody has had a smaller sample size than Rasmussen in their Florida polls. Nobody has ever done their polling over the course of one day in Florida either. Rasmussen is the only poll to do so.

Polls that are done in one day are often off. Zogby used to do one day polling but average their results out so that you would get a more reliable number.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 10:58 AM
Response to Reply #8
14. One day polls are just that. Snapshots. That doesn't make them a push poll.
I worked in polling for nearly ten years.

Zogby knows that one-day polls are just snapshots. Tracking polls are when you take small samples every day - within a state it can be between 50-100 a night, then you average three days' worth of results to get your tracking numbers.

The one day survey, a tracking survey, and a large-scale multi-day survey all do different things.

The length of the survey, the sample size and the time frame over which the survey was conducted don't make it a "push poll."

The question also does not qualify as a push question. McCain is more favorable to offshore drilling than Obama, who is not as supportive. The question reflects those facts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 11:11 AM
Response to Reply #14
17. Thanks for the info but
But if you go to the link you will see that Rasmussen states that McCain's offshore drilling stance is helping him out in Florida. The results of this poll are identitical to their last.

Also, has Obama ever said that offshore drilling will never reduce the oil and gas prices? I think the argument here is how long will it take and what the enviromental impacts would be. The pollster does not question the enviromental impact of this plan. It does not mention how long would it take for prices to go down.

Sir, this question is posed at a time when the gas prices are too high and the Republicans are pandering to the electorate by presenting a corrupt plan to reduce the oil and gas prices.

They had a similar question from their Ohio poll where they asked people would they support McCain's plan in order to reduce gas prices. That is a misleading question aimed at driving a false conclusion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 10:53 AM
Response to Reply #4
11. how does that make it a push poll?
I get the feeling nobody in this thread knows what the term means.

Clue: a push poll is NOT any poll whose results you don't like.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 10:38 AM
Response to Original message
5. That's not a push poll.
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 10:44 AM by MookieWilson
This one question cited, is not a complete summary of Obama's view on offshore drilling, however.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 10:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. The poll's primary focus was the off shore drilling
That is why they did it. They have stated that very clearly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gilpo Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 10:50 AM
Response to Original message
9. This is not a push poll...
The objective of a push poll is to contact as many people as possible to alter their opinion by asking misleading questions. Why would you only push poll 500 people? You'd want to reach thousands or more...

No, the likely purpose of this poll was to have misleading numbers in the media. Something for McCain to hang his hat on for funraising reasons.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 10:56 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. Those 500 people are going to talk you know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Captain Hilts Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 11:00 AM
Response to Reply #9
15. Not really. What you are describing is advocacy calls.
A push poll can come in several forms.

One, where you test negative questions only about your opponent and not your candidate.

Two, where you give misleading information about your opponent.

Three, where you employ a legitimate survey and methods but release the information very selectively.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gilpo Donating Member (601 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 03:11 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. hmm... OK, I stand corrected... thanks. (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 10:54 AM
Response to Original message
12. That's not surprising. He lists California as Soft Democratic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Carrieyazel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 01:51 PM
Response to Original message
23. I suspected that Quinnipiac poll from yesterday was bogus.
Rasmussen has a much higher rate of reliability than Quinnipiac, whether we like to admit it or not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. Take a look at this:
Edited on Thu Jun-19-08 02:02 PM by thewiseguy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dawgs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-19-08 07:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
26. Based on what? Do you have proof for that statement?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 07:56 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC