Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I know some posters are getting criticized for mentioning Russert's

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:15 PM
Original message
I know some posters are getting criticized for mentioning Russert's
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 10:15 PM by senseandsensibility
lack of tough questioning for bushco, especially in the runup to the invasion. I don't have a strong opinion about whether posters should be saying that now. But I just thought I'd point out that it was addressed on MSNBC during their coverage today. So maybe it's not as taboo or disrespectful as some seem to think it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:18 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yes, apparently he asked the tough questions and got milquetoast
answers. Hmmm. I'm not quite buying that either.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. What I heard was he didn't want to get into
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 10:21 PM by senseandsensibility
an argument, but he asked the tough questions and got their answers on the record. They gave the example of Cheney saying we would be greeted as liberators. I'm not sure I buy this either, but my point was that they brought it up. And that's his own network. Meanwhile, DUers are getting trashed for asking about the same thing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:27 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. We heard the same thing. He didn't want arguments, asked tough
questions, and got lousy answers. Who cares if that's on the record if it was all a lie? Maybe I'll retract that thought if anything is ever used as proof, but he didn't go out of his way to prove what the truth was. All to avoid an argument? Makes me suspicious.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KAZ Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #1
6. You and me both. I guess I'll hold off until tomorrow.
Truth be told, This frenzy is limited to us newsies.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
frazzled Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #1
8. It's that he didn't ask questions to other people
I think it's fine to say he asked the administration questions and they gave feeble answers. But his job as a journalist was to then ask questions to people on the other side of the issue: to my recollection, he didn't do that.

I think it's tragic that this man who so clearly enjoyed life and his work died so suddenly and so young (I am exactly his age). Truly tragic and awful. I'm sure he was a terrific person. I'm not sure he was a terrific journalist. I liked listening to him do commentary on primary nights--but I stopped watching his show years ago.

And as the afternoon and evening wore on, I was not sure that the news of the day needed to be wholly ignored for six non-stop hours of hagiography. I understand how his coworkers needed to do that. We possibly did not need to hear it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
babylonsister Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. He didn't follow up on what was said.
I have disagreed mightily with Russert, but not tonight so much. I'll miss him; watched MTP most every Sunday.

And I agree, it seems like an overindulgence on the part of cable, but that might just measure everyone's shock. When they started to repeat stuff, I was over it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dansolo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #1
28. He never asked followup questions
A real interviewer asks a question, get the canned response, and then pounces with a followup. He seems to always hammer the Democrats repeatedly on issues, but whenever he would interview someone from the Bush administration, he would let them spout their propaganda without questioning anything that they said.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:20 PM
Response to Original message
2. My Dad drank too much and had untreated PTSD from Vietnam
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 10:20 PM by Jake3463
However he was a good Dad and we didn't talk about his failings on the day he died.

Just saying he's a human being with a real family and a real son. He dropped the ball but we all drop the ball sometimes in our lives. He trusted the President that he wasn't lying about CIA intelligence.

He was hard on Cheney after there were no weapons and made him go on the record and address that. Thanks to him we have a record of Cheney and Co's changing story over the past 7 years.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Breeze54 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:23 PM
Original message
Russert was complicit. I feel sorry for his kids but many have died for the M$M Lies!
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 10:23 PM by Breeze54
:grr:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:23 PM
Original message
I'm sorry about your Dad's health problems
and I thank him for his service.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
4. And I'll bet none of his family or friends rushed to an Internet Discussion Board ...
... on the day he died to seek tributes, either. :shrug: :eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
5. When most of us drop the ball
it does not contribute to the deaths of thousands of people. A good reporter would never trust that a politician isn't lying - especially this president. For that matter, where was Russert (and yes, all the media) when the last two elections were stolen?


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
13. don't kid yourself.
Show me a someone in the media who took difinitive action to stop the Iraq war.

Someone who did what most of us condemn everyone 'else' for NOT doing-?

peace~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dflprincess Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 11:07 PM
Response to Reply #13
24. Kid myself about what?
I believe I mentioned the rest of the media didn't do anything and they are all complicit.

A good many of us on this board did do what we could to stop the war before it started - but most of us here lack the platforms or the influence the media stars we call reporters have.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:45 PM
Response to Reply #5
17. My dad was an officer
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 10:47 PM by Jake3463
and people at one point in his life died because of his decisions. Not thousands of people but some people. There was not a day in his life that didn't go by that he didn't think about people who were under him who died or the people on the other side who were killed. He wasn't high on the chain but a 2nd Lt.

We didn't talk about that at his funeral either but it was part of him as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:40 PM
Response to Reply #2
16. Very true. One of today's best posts on Russert. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bluerthanblue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:24 PM
Response to Original message
7. it's the
"fuck him" "right wing shill" style posts that I personally find disturbing.

EVERYONE has negative sides. EVERYONE has done or said things that have disapointed and angered someone, sometime.

There seems to be a drought of compassion and sensitivity in this world, especially lately, when it is more needed than ever.

peace~
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #7
9. I haven't seen those posts
fortunately. I agree with you. They sound terrible, but the ones I've seen have gone out of their way to be sensitive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Demit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:28 PM
Response to Original message
11. As a poster noted elsewhere, we are not in the Russerts' living room.
I don't see how talking truthfully about a public figure can be disrespectful. We are not exactly present at the funeral. This man was a public figure who wielded a LOT of power, and it's fair game to discuss just how he did that—and what effect it had on the affairs of our government.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:37 PM
Response to Reply #11
14. You make some good points
I honestly think some people find it disrespectful and they're entitled to that opinion. But his own network raised the question and answered it only hours after he died.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:49 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. He wasn't evil and I believe mostly good
He made a mistake that alot of people made.

Alot of Americans made that mistake twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:51 PM
Response to Reply #11
19. That's right. And we should have been able to have an intelligent discussion.
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 10:59 PM by TexasObserver
This is a political message board, where his work is commented upon weekly, and has been for years.

Today should have been a day to discuss the man's work, not to behave as if he was a god or hero. He was a man, and we should judge him by his work. Unfortunately, many felt there was only way to respond, and that was to offer high praise and insist that all do so.

I hate groupthink. Always have. It's ugly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:57 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Intelligent discussion is great. That doesn't include things like
"Tim Russert is a shit ass fucking scumbag and I'm fucking glad that piece of shit is dead."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 11:10 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. the problem has been the Tim worshippers, not the detractors
Your example never happened, but is typical of the hyperbole slung by those whose lives are about finding reasons to be outraged and indignant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 03:41 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. and where the heck was that written?
I've been all over these threads, and seen absolutely nothing like that. Zilch, nada, zip.

Nice try though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mzmolly Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
15. Russert was not alone.
eom
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:53 PM
Response to Original message
20. Tim Russert was part of the furniture
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 10:56 PM by bambino
it seems strange he isn't there anymore?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Political Heretic Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 10:56 PM
Response to Original message
21. NO, they are NOT getting criticized for "mentioning" it.
They are getting criticized for shitting all over a mans grave.

It's not what is being said. It's the free-republic style hate spewing way its being said by some.

Tim wasn't a saint. He was a moderately decent but flawed journalist. His career was longer than the bush administration, and during his lifetime he distinguished himself in many ways.

Russert was guilty was were many good journalist (aside from the shills) of believing the hype and fear coming from the aftermath of 9/11 and from the administration. That was his fatal mistake. But that doesn't mean I need to shit all over his memory on the day he died either.

I'm able to see being the typically conservative either/or black/white thinking that we are supposed to be above.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
senseandsensibility Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri Jun-13-08 11:00 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. The OP that I saw
Edited on Fri Jun-13-08 11:00 PM by senseandsensibility
was very polite and respectful and even mentioned that he or she had already said a prayer for Russert. The poster was still harshly criticized.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kath Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat Jun-14-08 03:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Goes way back before the Iraq occupation. Ask people who were around during the
ClintonBlowJob Debacle, and the 2000 pres. campaign. The way he spewed all the lies and distortions about Gore was despicable.

he's been a mediawhore for a long time. He was one of many, but had more influence than most.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 09:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC