Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Top Lieberman Campaign Official: We Begged Obama For Help In 2006 -- And He Came Through

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:54 PM
Original message
Top Lieberman Campaign Official: We Begged Obama For Help In 2006 -- And He Came Through
Now that Joe Lieberman has emerged as John McCain's lead attack dog against Barack Obama -- even going so far as to suggest that Obama's judgment could pose a danger to our safety -- there's some very interesting behind-the-scenes back-story to the Lieberman-Obama relationship that you should know about.

Specifically, a top official on Joe Lieberman's 2006 Senate reelection campaign tells me that Lieberman's staff practically begged Barack Obama to come in and endorse him at a critical moment -- requests that Obama agreed to, helping Lieberman minimize the damage from challenger Ned Lamont's recent entry into the contest.

This back-story is particularly relevant right now in light of Lieberman's harsh assaults on Obama's national security credentials.

The top Lieberman official, who was directly involved in securing Obama's help, tells me that the campaign was desperate for Obama to come to Connecticut in March of 2006, soon after Lamont entered the race.

"We needed him to strongly validate us as a candidate that liberal Democrats should not desert," the official tells me. "We went to the Obama operation with a very urgent plea for him to come out for us."

It's well known that Obama's 2006 endorsement was important. But it's not widely understood just how urgently the Lieberman people begged for Obama's help at a critical moment in Lieberman's career -- and in that light, just how much of a back-stabbing Lieberman's attacks on Obama now represent.

http://tpmelectioncentral.talkingpointsmemo.com/2008/06/top_lieberman_staffer_we_begge.php
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
1. LieberTraitor
HE's pissed because no Democrat could support him in the GE against another Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:59 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. McCain/Lieberman '08!
Watch them sink like a stone.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bread and Circus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:55 PM
Response to Original message
2. Lieberman is just a piece of shit creep. End of story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:57 PM
Response to Reply #2
3. That pretty much sums it up, but he wants to be VP to someone
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EffieBlack Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 08:57 PM
Response to Original message
4. Not surprising. It was amusing to see early in the campaign that some of the same Dems who
were dismissing Obama as too inexperienced, etc. to be a viable candidate fell all over themselves trying to get him out on the campaign trail to stump for them back in 2006.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #4
25. Exactly.."too inexperienced" but
not too inexperienced to campaign for all the 2006 Dem candidates that he helped get elected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:00 PM
Response to Original message
6. Why did Obama rush in to help a status quo, pro-war cheerleader defeat an ati-war challenger?
Edited on Tue Jun-10-08 09:01 PM by Skip Intro
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
10. For the 100th time now, he only backed Lieberman in the primary. When Lemont got the nom, Obama
backed him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #10
14. That doesn't address the question at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #14
21. Okay. Large, medium, or small? Tomato sauce or pesto base?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
28. Oh brother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. He helped out a fellow Dem
Politicians do that.

Of course, you knew that, right?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #11
15. I think Lamont was a Democrat too...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #15
23. Again, this was before the primary
Lieberman was still a Democrat.

And in order to get things done in the Senate, sometimes you have to do a few favors. I find nothing unusual here. If he would have immediately campaigned for Lamont, it could have made for a rather ugly situation at work.

Lieberman, as it turns out, has no moral scruples, and could give two shits who he pisses off.

So tell me, did Hillary campaign for Lamont prior to the Connecticut primary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sellitman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:07 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. At that point Joe was a Democrat.
His voting record was still largly liberal. Obama did what most Dems would do. In retrospect it was a bad choice because Joe has completely flipped out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:09 PM
Response to Reply #6
13. And here's a link for you:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:13 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. Why didn't he support the anti-war DEM to start with
instead of supporting one of the loudest pro-war cheerleaders in DC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:15 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. Why did Hillary support Lieberman over Lemont?
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2006/07/05/politics/main1774454.shtml

“I've known Joe Lieberman for more than thirty years. I have been pleased to support him in his campaign for re-election, and hope that he is our party's nominee,” the former first lady said in a statement issued by aides.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. That's not an answer, that's a diversion.
c'mon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. Well how about you answer why Hillary did it, and then I'll answer why Barack did it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skip Intro Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:03 PM
Response to Reply #20
29. I want to hear your answer so badly, that I will answer your question first.
Why did Hillary back Lieberman? Well, you know this - she's an agent of the status quo. Hell, everyone from Edwards to Obama to KO has told all of us that.

But the problem is, Obama, anti-war hero and change agent, had an opportunity to put those ideals into action, and actually help bring about the change that he has made his one-word slogan. Instead, he chose not to back the anti-war Democratic challenger, but to back the most vocal pro-war propagandist democrat in the party. That happened. Can't change it. So tell me. Why did he do it?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:41 PM
Response to Reply #29
32. Because he had political ambition, he's a centrist, and he's a politician.
And there are very few brave politicians.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:16 PM
Response to Reply #6
19. Because Obama was teamed with Lieberman when he first entered the Senate.
They put new members together with a member that has been there awhile to show them the ropes. Obama was unlucky enough to get Lieberman. So I guess Obama felt that helping him out was the least he could do. Maybe he (like me) figured Lieberman would lose and that would be the end of it. I'm sure he never figured Joe would turn Independent and run against the Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yellowcanine Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:01 PM
Response to Original message
7. "Holy Joe" a backstabber? Say it ain't so!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
8. That lowers my already low opinion of Lieberman n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Missouri Girl Donating Member (123 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:04 PM
Response to Original message
9. Wasn't Holy Joe
Obama's senatorial "mentor" when he first came into the Senate? Seems like I read that somewhere.

What a way to mentor someone Joe. Use and backstab, repeat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NotThisTime Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
22. No, that was Durban I believe, definitely not Joe....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LTR Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:19 PM
Response to Reply #22
24. Yes, Durbin was Obama's biggest backer
Along with Kerry.

I imagine Holy Joe didn't give a shit about him, unless it was to his own benefit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:31 PM
Response to Reply #22
27. lieman was said to be
"Obama's mentor" when he came to the senate.

"As to Lieberman being Obama's "mentor in the Senate"? Yes, he was. Every freshman Senator is assigned a more experienced mentor to help him learn the ropes, and when Obama was first elected to the Senate in 2004, Lieberman had been his party's vice presidential candidate in the previous Presidential election and was still well-respected. And Obama loyally endorsed Lieberman when Lieberman was challenged by newcomer Ned Lamont in the CT primary, which I didn't like, since Lamont was the better man; but once Lamont won the Democratic nomination and Lieberman decided to run against Lamont anyway as an Independent, Obama notably didn't endorse him; he stayed out of it."

http://vichydems.blogspot.com/2006/04/joe-lieberman-barack-obamas-mentor-in.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Diamonique Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 09:23 PM
Response to Reply #9
26. Yes Joe was Obama's mentor, but
it only means that he was assigned to him to show him the ropes, i.e. shortcuts to get from one place to another, where the various cafeterias are, which has the best ham sandwich, which runners/pages are the most responsible & trustworthy... that kinda stuff.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ejbr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
30. This is why Obama was not my first choice
Even though I find him to be an amazing candidate, I hate Lieberman more, and still hold deep resentment toward anyone responsible for his tenure. Anyone who despised Lieberman back in 2006 will not be surprised by this story.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Chloroplast Donating Member (723 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:13 PM
Response to Original message
31. Ugh, Lieberman is such a tool. He was on a losing ticket 8 years ago...
and is gung ho to join another. Hillary and Barack both did what friends do: support each other. How does Lieberman repay their loyalty? By jumping fence because he thinks he finally can belong to a winning team. Pffft.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
girl_interrupted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
33. Obama used poor judgment backing LIEberman
Why he didn't back Lamont from Day 1 is beyond me. But then Obama campaigned for Kerry, who voted for the war. It's confusing, isn't it? Joe LIEberman is as scummy as they get, even called off any investigations into Katrina. I wish the Dems would dump his ass.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 10:54 PM
Response to Reply #33
34. NO, it's not confusing if you can keep up.
lieberman was Obama's assigned mentor when he entered the Senate and was "begged" to endorse him for his re-election, which he did.

But, endorsed Lamont in the General because he won the primary.

Of course, he campaigned for Kerry..do you think he wanted bush?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:03 PM
Response to Original message
35. Fuck you, Joe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Larkspur Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:06 PM
Response to Original message
36. Karma is a B*tch to Obama too
As a CT Dem who worked hard for Ned Lamont, I have no sympathy for every “knife” Lieberman sticks into Obama’s back. I voted for Obama in CT’s Feb. 5, 2008 primary because I am basically an “Anybody but a Clinton/DLC and Republican” voter this election year. Obama should have held the same position as Sen. Russ Feingold who stated on Meet the Press in 2006 that he’d support the winner of CT’s Dem primary. Granted Obama gave Lieberman a lukewarm endorsement at CT’s JJB dinner but Obama failed to come to CT to campaign with Lamont in the 2006 general election. Obama managed to go to Massachusetts for book signings and fundraisers but failed to stop by CT to help Ned Lamont. I noticed that in 2008, he managed to make it to CT to win our delegates for his Prez nomination. This is why I can’t get enthusiastic about Obama. However, I will enjoy watching the cat fight between Lieberman and Obama. It will be entertaining. Karma is a B*tch and not just for Hillary.

And Hartford Courant columnist Colin McEnroe picks up on this story with a clear example of Lieberman’s half-hearted defense of Obama -- http://blogs.courant.com/colin_mcenroe_to_wit/2008/06/broin-out-with-o-and-joe.html . He despises Lieberman as much as I do.

There is only one thing that will make me forgive Obama for snubbing Lamont in 2006 – him getting the Senate Dems to strip Lieberman of his chairmanships in 2009.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FrenchieCat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jun-10-08 11:52 PM
Response to Reply #36
37. Well Ned Lamont understood, and endorsed Obama quite early
in the primary process.

Why I'm Supporting Barack Obama
by Ned Lamont
Thu Jan 10, 2008 at 03:49:55 PM PDT
http://www.dailykos.com/story/2008/1/10/184519/630/624/434646
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 09:16 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC