|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
AngryOldDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:11 PM Original message |
Okay...I think I could support HRC on the ticket. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oviedodem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:12 PM Response to Original message |
1. The only problem is that republicans will vote for McCain in droves; very possible. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryOldDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:15 PM Response to Reply #1 |
6. I don't know... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Clovis Sangrail (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:16 PM Response to Reply #1 |
8. I don't know that it matters |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:21 PM Response to Reply #1 |
13. That's my concern too. I could get behind it but would it energize the GOP |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
CakeGrrl (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
2. I still disagree. A supportive speech doesn't negate the vetting issues; however |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
azmouse (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
3. Bill refuses to allow himself to be vetted. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:26 PM Response to Reply #3 |
19. a non-issue |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
joshcryer (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:13 PM Response to Original message |
4. I'm pretty sure that's the point of this well written speech. Political posturing ftw. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
oldpol (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:14 PM Response to Original message |
5. me too, I might even vote for her as veep at the convention |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goddess40 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:15 PM Response to Original message |
7. no way - supreme court |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
AngryOldDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:17 PM Response to Reply #7 |
9. Good point. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
ecstatic (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:23 PM Response to Reply #7 |
16. I think she wants to break new ground though. There have already been |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsmirman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:24 PM Response to Reply #7 |
17. Trust me- I don't say this to be divisive, but she's a vetting nightmare for that post |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
anonymous171 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:17 PM Response to Original message |
10. I could support it but it is not a good idea. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PylesMalfunction (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:19 PM Response to Original message |
11. Personally... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
PylesMalfunction (362 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:21 PM Response to Original message |
12. Personally... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cottonseed (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
14. I'd support Hillary on the ticket and that's it. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
jsmirman (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:22 PM Response to Original message |
15. It was a great speech- don't lose track of reality, though |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
OzarkDem (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Sat Jun-07-08 12:25 PM Response to Original message |
18. VP or Senate Majority Leader |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Tue May 07th 2024, 10:54 PM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC