Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Republican king makers have to be considering how to get McCain off the ticket

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:38 PM
Original message
Republican king makers have to be considering how to get McCain off the ticket
Personally I stay away from the wild conspiracy theories but with the painful juxtaposition of Senator McCain's and Senator Obama's speeches last night and Senator Obama's brilliant AIPAC speech (put aside any policy disagreements you have - it was a brilliant speech) it has to be considered that serious Republicans are thinking that there must be some other option for St. Paul.

Obviously Senator McCain could always excuse himself between now and then for health reasons. How would they convince him to do so?
No idea and that is the reason it will probably fail, but some Republican strategists have to be thinking about it.

Beyond the possibility of a disastrous loss and further losses in the Senate and the House the other major problem facing the Republicans is that they will end the election not only with a substantial loss but also without a leader. They would remain without a center force to rebuild the party. This is the type of vacuum that the Republicans abhor the most.

Senator McCain's latest fund raising attempt has been reported as a dismal failure.

Don't be surprised to start hearing rumors of McCain having a health problem.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:39 PM
Response to Original message
1. They don't have any better candidates though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:41 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. Any bets they've talked quietly to Hillary reps?
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:45 PM
Response to Reply #4
7. Yes the suggestion is absurd
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
onenote Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
9. Fail.
I'd bet the ranch that they haven't. Its a profoundly absurd suggestion.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:19 PM
Response to Reply #4
14. Yeah, that's what they want. One of the most lockstep Democratic Senators.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
harun Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 02:56 PM
Original message
Hillary may be the Repub VP. No one in her camp will say
anything bad about McCain. They say crap every day about Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:42 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. They have governors
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jasmine621 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:55 PM
Response to Reply #1
29. Oh, they have plenty potential candidates who could excite the base
but they hve too many skeletons in their closets. The former CEO of HP, Carley Fioria, is a smart bright, articulate woman who is a McCain campaign advisor. If she can use her smarts, she alone can revive the GOP base for a new candidate. I predicted back in February that McCain would not emerge as the GOP candidate after the convention.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tippy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:22 AM
Response to Reply #1
51. Now that is really sad.....
But after their first debate, the old Jhonny Boy may reconsder himself
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:40 PM
Response to Original message
2. meh, they'll just pack their bags and move to Dubai.
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 12:40 PM by SoonerPride
They've squeezed all the money this old turnip has for them and they're free to abandon this heap for sunnier shores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BearSquirrel2 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:41 PM
Response to Original message
3. I have an idea ...

I have an idea. The Repubs can nominate Hillary instead. That's where she should be anyway.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:43 PM
Response to Reply #3
6. All the Fox bobble heads sure do love her lately, that's for sure.
Creeps me out.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:54 PM
Response to Original message
8. "Personally I stay away from the wild conspiracy theories ..."
Can you elaborate on that a bit? "Wild" conspiracy theories as opposed to what other kinds of conspiracy theories?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:05 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Well the theory that the administration was conspiring to use US attorneys for political purposes
was a conspiracy theory that turned out to be true.


I find Agnew's sudden resignation just a few months before Nixon to be too convenient to be coincidental. I would theorize that responsible people were aware that he was likely to become president and so that corruption activites that were known by some were allowed to 'be discovered' so that they could catch him red handed taking cash in the White House so he could be removed.

Its a theory, not proven and not particularly wild either. Agree?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mr_Jefferson_24 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #10
16. Yes I would agree the theory of what was actually...
...behind Agnew's resignation is neither proven nor particularly wild.

The words "conspiracy theory" seem to be very charged and all too often immediately applied to any departure from the consensus, official story/media portrayal of a story. Used in this way they become a convenient club used to suppress and discourage honest investigations into the truth surrounding important stories/events.

Do you agree?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #16
32. Yes I understand your original point better.
My point is that personally I am very conservative about such theories and, for example, are reasonably convinced that Oswald acted alone, but with my experience growing up in a very conservative family and having worked for the Republicans 35 years ago I know how they think and I know that they are thinking along these lines.

It doesn't mean that they will actually do something but they are thinking about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
monmouth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:14 PM
Response to Original message
11. Heard that Jeb is on the "short list" for VP. Wait and see....n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 02:07 PM
Response to Reply #11
35. Political Suicide at its finest
I don't think McCain is going to be to eager to accept the taint (no pun intended) of another Bush on the ticket.

Obama wouldn't even have to bring up McCain's love of the Bush's - it would be right there on the campaign sign!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
busymom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:15 PM
Response to Original message
12. I think you're right!!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:18 PM
Response to Original message
13. Who else do they have?
Romney's probably the only guy less charismatic than McCain. Huckabee's a friendly loon. Giuliani's as popular as a glass full of shit. Jindal and Pawlenty are too young and inexperienced; they'd negate Obama's only disadvantage. The rest of their Senate is tainted by the past decade of Republican failure and Bush-following. Who can they pick?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:29 PM
Response to Reply #13
17. List of Republican Governors
Robert R. "Bob" Riley Alabama List 2003 2010 (term limits)
Sarah Palin Alaska List 2006 2010
Arnold Schwarzenegger California List 2003 2010 (term limits)
M. Jodi Rell Connecticut List 2004 2010
Charles J. "Charlie" Crist, Jr. Florida List 2007 2010
George E. "Sonny" Perdue III Georgia List 2003 2010 (term limits)
Linda Lingle Hawaii List 2003 2010 (term limits)
C.L. "Butch" Otter Idaho List 2007 2010
Mitchell E. "Mitch" Daniels Indiana List 2005 2008
Bobby Jindal Louisiana List 2008 2011
Timothy J. Pawlenty Minnesota List 2003 2010
Haley Reeves Barbour Mississippi List 2004 2011 (term limits)
Matthew Roy Blunt Missouri List 2005 2008
David E. Heineman Nebraska List 2005 2010 (term limits)
James A. Gibbons Nevada List 2007 2010
John Henry Hoeven III North Dakota List 2000 2008
Donald Carcieri Rhode Island List 2003 2010 (term limits)
Marshall C. "Mark" Sanford, Jr. South Carolina List 2003 2010 (term limits)
Marion Michael "Mike" Rounds South Dakota List 2003 2010 (term limits)
James Richard "Rick" Perry Texas List 2000 2010
Jon Huntsman, Jr. Utah List 2005 2008
James H. "Jim" Douglas" Vermont List 2003 2008
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 02:04 PM
Response to Reply #17
34. The only one I see on that list that has any appeal would be Jindal
But he wouldn't be much more appealing than McCain - only thing going for him would be the "look at us, we have minorities too!" vote for the Republicans. They would lose far more due to that anyway.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:21 PM
Response to Original message
15. Believe it or not McCain is their best chance. Anyone else is going to be considered too Republican
Lets be real. The media has given him this Maverick persona that helps him out a lot. It attracts the stupid Democrats that voted for Bush TWICE
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:30 PM
Response to Reply #15
18. If he can't raise money he has no chance
If they could find somebody who can raise money and be a leader for the party in its rebuilding it would be better than their present option
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Remember McCain called the media his BASE
never forget that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 02:54 PM
Response to Reply #23
39. and they are the most fickle base to have - they will turn on a dime or a Barr
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wiggs Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
19. Man, I was thinking the same things this morning. On the other hand though,
the 2009 POTUS is going to face unprecedented and intractable challenges in every policy area (due to the disastrous policies of the last 8 years) and the GOP is sure to line up over the next four years to pillory Obama for them and position themselves for 2012.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chieftain Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:34 PM
Response to Original message
20. The sad truth is that McCain is the best of a very bad lot. They
have no where to turn. That said, he is simply godawful.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Disturbed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:42 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. The deal was for McLame to put Jeb on as VP.
McLame would only run for one term then Jeb would be annointed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:38 PM
Response to Original message
21. They might just go balls to the wall and dredge up Jebby to run
Bush the III (read: turd)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:43 PM
Response to Reply #21
25. ironically he would have been so much better than GW lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Arugula Latte Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #25
37. It's a strange thing to ponder, if Jeb had been the one squatting in the White House instead of W
He probably would have been minimally "better" and more competent (although I don't buy the incompetence argument about W & Co.; I think they don't give a shit about consequences as long as their top .5 percent base keeps raking in the big, big $$ through their policies). Anyway, Jeb probably would not have made millions of people quite so furious to the point where they are coming out in droves to vote and donate to Democrats. 2006 might not have been quite as dramatic of a reaction, as well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:44 PM
Response to Reply #21
26. Oh by the way have you issued an updated Math/WEA ? Is it too soon to see movement?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #26
31. First thing this morning, as usual, but no WEA movement today
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:46 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. Breaking AZ consumer confidence lower in 16 years
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
phrigndumass Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #27
33. Scrimp-n-save Arizonans need change!
Vote Obama (or Barr)!

:patriot:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. The Contrast Between Kennedy And Nixon When It Came To Presentation Was Just As Startling
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 01:46 PM by DemocratSinceBirth
And Nixon lost by 100,000 votes or two tenth of a percent out of 68,000,000 or so vote cast...

And who would the Republicants run instead of him...


Jeb Bush would be a good replacement but the Bush* brand is tainted...

Romney?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:49 PM
Response to Original message
28. They'll write off the presidency itself, and position as the agents of change next time.

Republicans are like the Italian city-states raiding Slavic towns for slaves. Keep raiding the same village year after year, and there eventually won't be any Slavs left to take.

So they have to let the Dems rebuild the economy from time to time so they have something to steal next time they are in power.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:56 PM
Response to Reply #28
30. When I visited Saigon in 1978, 3 years after the war I was one of the first
Americans to go back. Everything was frozen in time. There were buildings where literally the cranes were lifting cement up to finish construction.

In three years nothing had been done and Saigon had been reduced to a massive refugee camp (the point of my visit was to start arranging to take some of these people out) and there was only one functioning restaurant.


The common joke, even among the new comrads in charge, was that the central committee had just passed a resolution to withdraw back to the North and let the Americans come in and finish everything, and then reinvade the south lol.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemocratSinceBirth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 02:09 PM
Response to Reply #30
36. Well, The VietNameze Did Come To Learn That The Soviets And The Chinese Were Just As Imperialiatic
And they were but a pawn in a great game of chess...But it can be said they used the Soviets and the Chinese as much as they used them...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 02:53 PM
Response to Reply #36
38. Well yes except
After the Americans left in 1975 Vietnam was invaded by China and the Vietnamese made the Chinese army pay a heavy price.


In early 1979, China invaded Vietnam to "teach Vietnam a lesson" for persecuting ethnic Chinese and for invading Cambodia. The Sino-Vietnamese War was brief, but casualties were high on both sides.


It is estimated that in a few short months China had lost 30,000 soldiers compared to the 56,000 that the Americans lost in 12 years of conflict.

The Vietnamese had secretly been preparing elaborate traps for decades that would create false front lines. The Chinese would over run them and the Vientamese would emerge from the other side cutting them off and mowing down trapped brigades by the hundreds. There were reports that the Vietnamese had problems with their machine guns would over heat and even melt from using so much ammunition in the slaughter. Most people are completely unaware that the Vietnamese fought another war and won it after the American war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
symbolman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #38
43. Man I thought I respected you Before..
now its grown immeasurably :)

Fantastic info, hell, I was near the last of the draft then, did my time in the USAF and after took care of 300 shell shocked Veterans in a VA hospital..

Sad times, even worse coming in this Bush created Parallel Universe, more damaged troops than ever, and an "enemy" that won't be beaten..

Thanks for your service to us all.. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ieoeja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 09:57 AM
Response to Reply #38
47. North Vietnam fought and won three wars after we left.

They conquered South Vietnam.

They unseated the Khmer Rouge in Cambodia.

They beat up an attempted invasion by China.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 02:55 PM
Response to Original message
40. I don't think they are, the smart money is sitting this one out.
The know the country is pissed at the Republicans, and they don't like sending good money after bad.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 03:01 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. I agree more with this assessment.
They know they don't have a pot to piss in. They are too shrewd to go for broke. Always have been. They are going to put their money in the Congressional races.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
billyoc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 03:08 PM
Response to Reply #42
44. Yes, and they've already spent most of their NRCC money defending 3 special elections
to no avail. :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:05 PM
Response to Reply #44
46. Yes and they also had to spend $ 5million to defend Duke Cunningham's
district which they narrowly won. Now we have a strong candidate and will get that one too
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
41. If they get rid of McCain, they're screwed. If they keep McCain, they're screwed.
Either way, they're screwed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 03:15 PM
Response to Original message
45. it`s going to be romney.....he`s still avaiable
or theyu will wait till 2012 and run a "new republican"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:03 AM
Response to Original message
48. They didn't want him to begin with, remember?
They wanted Romney. And the big frontrunner - prior to any actual voting - was Rudy (911, 911, 911) Guiliani. The only problem was that even Republicans wouldn't vote for either of them or any of the rest of the case of characters. McCain and Huckabee were the only ones that anyone could stand.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:05 AM
Response to Original message
49. Problem is, he just had an extremely thorough physical that proclaimed him in Terrific Health
Hard to go from that to: "He is too sick to run"
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu Jun-05-08 10:18 AM
Response to Reply #49
50.  a little cancer testing would do the right trick
the problem is getting him to agree to it

Just because they want it doesn't mean it will happen
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:59 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC