Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

With Obama beating Hillary by 30,000 in MT. She can no longer claim she won the popular vote

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:29 AM
Original message
With Obama beating Hillary by 30,000 in MT. She can no longer claim she won the popular vote
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 07:29 AM by BrentTaylor
The media better call her on it
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NJmaverick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
1. Good point
Although she is going into hiding and her staff is being fired. There will not be a whole lot of people to carry her message.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:33 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Shes keeping her supporters angry by saying it. And its not true. Even with her math now
not counting caucus states
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:39 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. MSNBC had her up by 3000 prior to DS/MT - now down by 17000 - but then add in Mich
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:32 AM
Response to Original message
2. I was wondering where this ended up. What was the spread in SD?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Thrill Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. She won there by 10,000. Net 20,000 for Obama. Popular vote win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #4
7. She needs Mich to be counted to claim popular vote win
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
pdxmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:36 AM
Response to Original message
5. You forget that Montana doesn't count. Hillary declared South Dakota
as the end of the race.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #5
8. Ah crap!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WA98296 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
9. Great, thanks for bringing this up. We need to make sure the press GETS it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:41 AM
Response to Original message
10. Wooo hooo! Another bit of Hillary BS gone!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:45 AM
Response to Original message
11. Unfortunately, the way she is counting it she is in the lead
First, its nice that Clinton is finally including caucus votes, because without them she could not be claiming 18 million voters. With all primaries and caucuses, including Florida and Michigan, Clinton ended up with 18,013,981 votes (with the Montana polls not closed yet, she actually did not have 18 million at the time she gave her speech). Obama has 17,829,810 if you give him no votes in Michigan, which gives Clinton a narrow lead. If you count uncommitted for Obama he moves to 18,067,978, ahead of Clinton. Even reducing this to the percentage of uncommitted that said they would vote for Obama if he were on the ballot in the exit poll, Obama maintains his lead. Clinton surrogates keep saying that the uncommitted votes need to be honored as uncommitted, as that is what the rule says. But you can not have it both ways, either rules should matter or you should focus on the true will of the voter. If you side with rules, Florida and Michigan should not count at all and Obama has a large lead, if you side with voter will Obama maintains a narrower lead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Window Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:14 AM
Response to Reply #11
12. Ah, Clinton math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
calmblueocean Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:20 AM
Response to Original message
13. K&Red for truth
It will be interesting if she keeps clinging to this lie, and whether the media calls her on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grace0418 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
14. She couldn't honestly say that before either.
Clinton math.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:10 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC