Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

NPR: As delusional as Hillary

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:23 AM
Original message
NPR: As delusional as Hillary
Just listened to the Morning Edition political roundup and had to laugh at the desperation of the shillbot host still clinging to the hope that Obama will "lose," like by saying "IF this nomination has been decided..." and calling Obama the "possible presumptive nominee" and searching for some sign, any sign that Obama is willing to put Goneril on his ticket.

Dream on, shillbot! :rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
quickesst Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:36 AM
Response to Original message
1. Saw this coming.....
months ago. Ungracious in competition, ungracious in victory. Hate is a hard drug to shake when you're having so much fun with it. Thanks.
quickesst
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:40 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. Look, they've been lying daily about this race since January.
They've interviewed Hillary campaign workers pretending they're random supporters, they've misrepresented the delegate math, they've flogged Hillary's talking points religiously, and when they enter cloud cuckoo land they deserve to be laughed at.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
karynnj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:31 AM
Response to Reply #3
16. I agree - and one of the worst things is that the entire media
started to compute the total popular vote and to give it a prominence that was astonishing. Why? After February 5th, the Clinton's knew they likely would loss the pledged delegate count. They slowly pushed two concepts - that if the pledged delegates count was close - never specified completely, but one number used a lot was within 50, the difference wouldn't matter. The other was this popular vote. Later they added in an estimator that computed the "electoral college count" for the states won.

The fact is that she lost and lost in a very nasty race where she started with incredible advantages. Yesterday, McCain used the Clinton talking points to call Obama's win less than legitimate, followed by HRC not congratulating Obama on getting the delegates needed. This with the chorus of pundits arguing that he can't win without her base. Think about that has anyone ever made that argument before?

Look at 1992, where Clinton won, but Tsongus took most of the NE. The NE is a major part of the Democratic base and Tsongus had been the front runner. There the media clearly favored Clinton. He was the comeback kid and the big story when he came in second. Were there calls to put Tsongus or another New Englander on the ticket? After all, we could lose MA, NH, RI, Ct etc if not. I don't remember it - not even when a second Southern Baptist from an adjacent state, who 4 years before had been the first DLC endorsed candidate was chosen. I recall no complaints - this was a pick of a VP from the same wing of the party as the President. It worked very well as Gore was comfortable echoing Clinton's positions.

I hope Obama takes his time and asks for the ticket that he would be most comfortable with. Bill Clinton often argued that is the first important decision that a potential President makes - and he should fight to get someone who would be comfortable with his message.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Spider Jerusalem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #1
11. HA!
Clinton? Ungracious in competition ('it WILL be me'; 'I'm in it for the long run...it's not a very long run, it'll be over February fifth', 'I have a lifetime of experience that I bring to the table, John McCain has a lifetime of experience, and Barack Obama has a speech he made in 2002'), ungracious in defeat (she gave what sounded for all the world like a fucking VICTORY SPEECH last night).

If there's hate, she's earned it, bought and paid for with her own behaviour.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mdmc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #1
13. There is no victory. HRC still has a "shot"
But I hope Obama remains safe.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:40 AM
Response to Original message
2. Are you sure about that?
I listened to their coverage last night during the speeches and it didn't come off that way at all. I think maybe you're projecting a bit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:42 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Morning Edition is a different show.
It's the morning news show and the ding-dong "hosts" are bigtime shillbots. I thought the election coverage last night was pretty good too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tesha Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 06:58 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. This morning's coverage on "Morning Edition" was awful.
They gave the Republican talking head about three times
the airtime as the Democratic talking head and then gave
the Republican the last word so he sould tell us how badly
we'll lose the General Election.

They also gave Hillary far more air time, better acoustics,
and far more cheering from the crowd than they gave Obama.
(Of course the acoustics were understandable; Hillary was
probably speaking in a far smaller venue to a far smaller
crowd. Still, they could have taken their feed from Obama's
microphone instead from some mike halfway down the audience.)

NPR, like the rest of the media, knows that this nomination
story has been a big draw and they don't want to get off
the easy gravy train yet, so they're trying to string things
along. But it's over. Obama has won, Hillary has lost, and
any actual reportage of the situation would acknowledge that
fact.

Tesha
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PassingFair Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 12:05 PM
Response to Reply #12
23. I had a spat with an old friend of mine over this last night....
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 12:05 PM by PassingFair
he was going on and ON about the "popular vote"
and how it de legitimizes Obama's win...

I disputed the "popular vote" scheme, but he was
adamant. I told him that he needed to listen to
more unbiased sources, and he said (and I quote)

"Less biased than NPR?"

He seems to think NPR is even SLIGHTLY as creditable
a source as they were 9 years ago.

I haven't been able to believe anything on NPR since
Michael Powell came to the FCC, and the regular reporters
were sent packing.

My friend is an Obama supporter, and he doesn't use
the "internets".

He is buying the baloney they are pushing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 05:47 AM
Response to Original message
5. Right now they're interviewing republicans on the weighty question
of where Hillary goes from here. :crazy:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 06:16 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. Makes sense, Hillary is a DINO after all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:06 AM
Response to Reply #6
15. Isn't everybody over 25 a DINO?
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
25. Only to jr. high or high school kids
:sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MiniMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 06:24 AM
Response to Original message
7. Not disputing you, but Obama IS the presumptive nominee until the convention
The nominee is not officially decided until the convention. Just like McSame is the presumptive republic nominee until the repub convention. That doesn't put his nomination in question, it is the correct terminology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ayeshahaqqiqa Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 06:30 AM
Response to Original message
8. On a non-political message board I frequent
one of the resident conservatives announced that Obama had made history yesterday--and was quite respectful, too, I might add (I think she may vote for him--in our off topic discussions she has mentioned her disillusionment with Bush).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dems_rightnow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 06:35 AM
Response to Original message
9. That will all stop soon
There are still a bunch of uncommitted superdelegates, almost all of whom will jump on the Obama-train. I'd guess there will be significant Hillary defections as well. Everyone knows it's over, and they'll get in line.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pryderi Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 06:40 AM
Response to Original message
10. Goneril! lol K&R
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Darth_Kitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:00 AM
Response to Original message
14. Have you ever read Shakespeare?
Just figured you may never have.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EFerrari Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 09:47 AM
Response to Reply #14
20. Goneril ran a scorched earth campaign, too, and with about as much success. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 07:42 AM
Response to Original message
17. I wonder if the NPR you get is different than the one I get.
Yesterday, NPR's discussions were completely based on the assumption that Obama was the nominee. The programs in question include Day to Day, Fresh Air, and All Things Considered.

Who is this "shillbot"? Did her opinion dominate the entire two hours of Morning Edition?

And, for the record, Obama is not the nominee any more that McCain is the nominee. The functional word is "presumptive", and for good reason.

I'll never understand the NPR despisers -- they keep listening. Masochism?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 09:33 AM
Response to Reply #17
18. I figured it out awhile ago...
The certainly don't donate to support NPR or their local NPR station, and they figure that continuing to listen without donating is a way of 'putting it to them'. That's the most logical explanation I can come up with (which should make the point adequately).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 11:43 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. You're probably correct.
NPR has annoyed me on occasion with their analyses, but they remain the best thing going.

I guess that some folks want to believe that NPR is truly the Voice of Liberal America (as suggested by Limbaugh, Gingrich et al.). They find it infuriating when NPR actually interviews Republicans without snorting and giggling or will read Pentagon press releases without scathing criticism.

I have no fear of a broad spectrum of news, and I actually demand it. Clearly, others do not.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 09:43 AM
Response to Reply #17
19. ive heard it too
there are couple of NPR hosts that you can almost hear the support in their voice. Robert siegel was one that comes to mind.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Buzz Clik Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 11:37 AM
Response to Reply #19
21. Well, you haven't "heard the support in his voice" lately.
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mkultra Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 03:51 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. it was some time back
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PM7nj Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
26. Yea, Morning Edition was sickening today.
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 04:42 PM by PM7nj
They went on for about 10 minutes over "working class white voters."
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 09:40 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC