Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This primary was Leonard-Hagler all over again- Exciting, historic and controversial.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:12 AM
Original message
This primary was Leonard-Hagler all over again- Exciting, historic and controversial.
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 01:15 AM by Katzenkavalier
In 1987, Sugar Ray Leonard was a retired young fighter who left a big mark in boxing with his wins against Wilfred Benitez, Roberto Duran and Thomas Hearns, but who was 3 years away from his best shape (apart of being a damaged fighter- he has retina and, yes, cocaine problems). Marvelous Marvin Hagler was, in the other hand, a powerful, scary looking man that had held the World Middleweight Championship steadily since 1980, beating the crap of most of his challengers in the process.

When it was announced that Leonard was coming out of retirement and, apart of that, moving up in weight to challenge Marvin Hagler for the Middleweight crown, people thought he was nuts. Did he still have the legs, the speed, the skills to even make it to the 12th round against Marvelous? How could he think he could beat a man that many people saw as one of the baddest men in boxing? Was he nuts? After all, Leonard struggled to beat Tommy Hearns in 14. Marvelous pulverized the man in 3...

Hagler took the fight expecting to win quite easily. He suspected the smaller man had nothing left in the tank, and that he couldn't handle the pressure he was going to put on him. His plan was simple- overpower Leonard, corner him, work that body on the ropes until he crumbles. No science. No plan B- just go there, KO Leonard as expected, cash the check and retire. After all, he was Marvelous Marvin Hagler- the best middleweight in the world. He couldn't lose to a smaller and washed up man in Sugar Ray.

However, Ray spend a lot of time getting ready for Marvin. He studied the old Marvelous well and realized he still had the youth, the speed and boxing skills necessary to outpoint the big favorite. He realized Marvin was just going to walk towards him and try to stop him as quickly as possible, and knew that Marvin was not going to like constant side to side movement- after all, Marv was in his mid 30s already and one could see that he was starting to slip a bit in the skills department. So, he came in with a plan- not to KO the champ, as he knew he probably was not going to, but to surprise him... and outpoint him.

And that's exactly what Sugar Ray Leonard did. In a surprisingly close and competitive match, he proved to Hagler that he was no fruitcake- he was ready to outwork and outsmart Hagler for 12 rounds. Hagler didn't give up any time- he kept bringing his pressure, his power, his toughness to Leonard non-stop. But Leonard was able to take it and dish it out. By the 9th round, one could sense Marvin was starting to get frustrated- he was realizing he wasn't, as a champion, expecting to be fighting such a close fight with Leonard and, worst of all, losing to him. In the end, a tired Leonard had done such a great job in the first and middle rounds of the fight, that he was able to coast to a close Split Decision win against Marvelous Marvin Hagler.

Hillary Clinton resembled the former middleweight champion- She came in as a big favorite, expected to crush the unprepared lightweight junior senator from Illinois in a couple of rounds- he was not supposed to be ready for her. Her team was NOT prepared for a long, tactical battle against a superbly skilled politician. By March 4th, we could sense the desperation starting to get the best of Hillary and her team. By then, she knew she had lost, but her resiliency kept her in the fight, managing to win clearly some of the last rounds against the challenger.

Barack Obama resembled Leonard- He came in as a huge underdog who knew that Hillary Clinton's campaign's biggest weakness was overconfidence. They sub-estimated him. They didn't "train" for a long, tactical boxing match- they trained for a 5 round brawl. After Barack won the first round (Iowa) and made out of round 5 alive and well (South Carolina), Hillary's corner, and Hillary herself, lost their focus and let the young challenger shine without being able to do anything about it. Once he had it in the bag, he did coast a bit in the end, but just to avoid any punishment and save energy for the battles ahead (McCain).

So, in other words- just like Leonard W12 (SD) Hagler, Obama W12 (SD) Hillary.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:13 AM
Response to Original message
1. I was thinking more Tyson/Holyfield...
...but your comparison is much more civil.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. It would have been Tyson-Holyfield
Had Obama managed to stop Hillary on March 4th or May 20th.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MercutioATC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:20 AM
Response to Reply #2
5. Yes, but "When you're losing, bite off an ear" applies here as well...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:24 AM
Response to Reply #5
6. LOL! True!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Va Lefty Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:18 AM
Response to Original message
3. Douglas/ Tyson
Edited on Wed Jun-04-08 01:18 AM by Va Lefty
Nobody thought Douglas had a prayer. He beat Tyson fair and square even after Don King tried to change the rules. Sound familiar?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 01:19 AM
Response to Original message
4. Yep
And you've got bitterenders to this day who insist Hagler was robbed. The willowly "nice" guy with the pretty hair flat-out outboxed the bruiser, no question about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Colobo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:07 AM
Response to Original message
7. Kick!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rolleitreks Donating Member (282 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Jun-04-08 08:25 AM
Response to Original message
8. While I've always supported Obama, I think Hagler was robbed.
It was a tie, and a tie goes to the champ.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 01:08 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC