Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

How will the Pundits and Columnists takes sides in the GE? Here's my list so far

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 04:06 PM
Original message
How will the Pundits and Columnists takes sides in the GE? Here's my list so far
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 05:01 PM by featherman
This is kind of a "top of my head" list of cable news hosts and commentators as well as columnists and news anchors and how I think they will likely slant the coverage during this GE campaign. Each of them does it as we know. Obviously Faux is not included but if there is a likely pro-Obama employee of Faux that you know of, please include.

Feel free to add to this list. I will continue to tally through the GE and change "affiliations" as necessary:

PUNDITS, COLUMNISTS, AND ANCHORS TAKE SIDES FOR THE GE: likely breakdown as I see it today 6/2/08

Keith Olbermann - Obama
Tim Russert - McCain
Rachel Maddow - Obama
Pat Buchanan - McCain
Chris Matthews - Chris Matthews
Howard Fineman - unknown
Jonathan Alter - Obama
Richard Wolffe - Obama
Andrea Mitchell - McCain
Brian Williams - McCain

Wolf Blitzer - McCain
Candy Crowley - McCain
John King - McCain
Jack Cafferty - Obama
Larry King - not of this planet
Glenn Beck - McCain
Anderson Cooper - Peter Pan

George Stephanopoulus - McCain
Charles Gibson - McCain

Bob Herbert - Obama
Paul Krugman - unknown
David Broder - McCain
Frank Rich - Obama
Charles Krauthammer - McCain
E.J. Dionne - Obama
Maureen Dowd - hates everybody equally
David Brooks - McCain
Thomas Friedman - unknown
William Kristol - McCain
Mark Shields - Obama


Katie Couric - unknown

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
RUMMYisFROSTED Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 04:11 PM
Response to Original message
1. Steve Doocy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr.Phool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 04:13 PM
Response to Original message
2. I disagree about Krauthammer.
Even McCain isn't crazy enough for him. He might endorse Francisco Franco if we dig him up for him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SOS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:44 PM
Response to Reply #2
35. Franco would suffice in a pinch
The neocons base their political philosophy on the Italian Fascist Party of the 1920s and 1930s.
Rove's foreign policy adviser (and yellowcake forger) Michael Ledeen is a fanatical admirer of Mussolini and D'Annunzio.
If they could dig up Mussolini, Ledeen and Rove would be the campaign co-chairs.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 04:15 PM
Response to Original message
3. John King - McCain; Thomas Friedman - Obama; Anderson Cooper - Peter Pan
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #3
9. I've changed Anderson Cooper to "Peter Pan" per your suggestion
and John King to McCain. I suppose I should include his girlfriend/wife/whatever in this but don't watch McCNN much anymore so can't remember most of their commentators and reporters.

Thomas "Units" Friedman is hard for me to pin down yet. AIPAC?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
vi5 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
4. Chris Matthews....."unknown".....
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA..........oh man. That made my day. His man crush on McCain is going to make his Bush love seem positively hateful and loathsome by comparison.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 04:25 PM
Response to Reply #4
5. I know what you are saying but I'm getting a feeling Chris's passionate crush
on McCain may be cooling a bit - it happens with love around the world. Maybe McCain didn't ask him to the prom or something.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SayitAintSo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:31 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. I dunno .. Obama made his leg tingle... remember ? n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
6. Good idea - and one made possible by Dan Rather's admission that corpmedia NEEDED to protect Bush
before and during the 2004 campaign for the favorable rulings they expected in his second term. McClellan's recollections further validate how IN THE TANK the media was for Bush for so long.

If not for those who admitted media's complicity in recent months, McCain would be far ahead of Obama in the breakdown you posted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 04:55 PM
Response to Reply #6
7. I'm thinking this is a much better breakdown than Gore or Kerry got
The wackiest prediction I did not include since it was too strange

Matt Drudge - Obama

http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0608/10744.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 05:04 PM
Response to Reply #7
14. Gore had about 70% of corpmedia for Bush and post 9-11 Bush had 90% of media carrying his water.
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 05:39 PM by blm
Corpmedia had other, more greedy reasons for targeting Kerry, too.

FIVE YEARS AGO TODAY:

June 2, 2003
Kerry Seeks to Reverse FCC's "Wrongheaded Vote"

Commission Decision May Violate Laws Protecting Small Businesses; Kerry to File Resolution of Disapproval

WASHINGTON - Senator John Kerry today announced plans to file a "Resolution of Disapproval" as a means to overturn today's decision by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to raise media ownership caps and loosen various media cross-ownership rules. Kerry will soon introduce the resolution seeking to reverse this action under the Congressional Review Act and Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act on the grounds that the decision may violate the laws intended to protect America's small businesses and allow them an opportunity to compete. As Ranking Member of the Senate Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship, Kerry expressed concern that the FCC's decision will hurt localism, reduce diversity, and will allow media monopolies to flourish. This raises significant concerns about the potential negative impacts the decision will have on small businesses and their ability to compete in today's media marketplace. In a statement released earlier today regarding the FCC's decision, Kerry said: "Nothing is more important in a democracy than public access to debates and information, which lift up our discourse and give Americans an opportunity to make honest informed choices. Today's wrongheaded vote by the Republican members of the FCC to loosen media ownership rules shows a dangerous indifference to the consolidation of power in the hands of a few large entities rather than promoting diversity and independence at the local level. The FCC should do more than rubber stamp the business plans of narrow economic interests.

"Today's vote is a complete dereliction of duty. The Commissioners are well aware that these rules greatly influence the competitive structure of the industry and protect the public's access to multiple sources of information and media. It is the Commission's responsibility to ensure that the rules serve our national goals of diversity, competition, and localism in media. With today's vote, they shirked that responsibility and have dismissed any serious discussion about the impact of media consolidation on our own democracy."

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:32 PM
Original message
Drudge thinks he'll win
and would love to have the occasional link thrown his way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
butterfly77 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 04:57 PM
Response to Original message
8. You are wrong on krugman,,,,
he won't be for Obama he will be for Nader or come out of some other bag...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
newmajority Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 04:58 PM
Response to Reply #8
10. Yep. He's been a complete Hillary tool for months now
and I don't see him endorsing Obama at all.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 05:01 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. he has also conceeded that there was very little difference between the two on policy issues
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 04:59 PM
Response to Reply #8
11. I know he was quite harsh on Obama... so he may just leave the reservation as
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 05:02 PM by featherman
you suggest - I changed him to unknown
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tatiana Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 05:02 PM
Response to Original message
13. I bet you 3 F.U.'s that Friedman is in the tank for McCain. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 05:48 PM
Response to Reply #13
15. Yeah, Friedman was all over that gas tax holiday.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbluto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 05:57 PM
Response to Original message
16. Your Bias is showing (re:Krugman)
No way that Krugman is pro-McCaine.

Yet in snarkville you put him as unknown.

This list is a typical tactic. Put in enough "TrueFacts", then slip in the shiv a few of your own biases, then hope people swallow the whole list.

You are in danger of becoming like the monster you (supposedly) intended to fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. If you are addressing me, in the original post I had him for Obama but one
reply speculated that he might not reverse himself that dramatically and may opt for neutrality or something. So I moved him to "unknown".
I don't see where the bias is in that? I'm just trying to figure this out. I will certainly put him in the Obama column as soon as he makes it clear that is where he is going to be. I think Krugman is great and I'd like to have his strong voice on our side in this fight. But has he moved to supporting Obama yet?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbluto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:24 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. Um....ok. You make a good point.
I responded reflexively.

I've just seen too many on this board tear him a new one merely because he's not cheerleading for Obamaa and occasionally has some critical things to say.

But I can't blame my post on the others on this board - it was me who did the typing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #18
32. Paul's a stand-up guy with principles... he's been so harsh on Obama that
it might take a while for him to pivot to open support. This is no way implies he would ever, ever be a McCain guy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BklynChick Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:29 PM
Response to Original message
19. Eugene Robinson -- Obama
:rofl: about Chris Matthews. I think he's a McCain man myself.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
21. Dowd likes manly men, so she's for McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. Wouldn't bank on that
She's about as predictable as Matthews.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:33 PM
Response to Reply #21
24. McCain manly?? no way. She will definitely be for O IMHO
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CatsDogsBabies Donating Member (652 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:42 PM
Response to Reply #21
33. Is McCain a manly man?
not to me (a woman), he isn't. I think McCain is creepy and he hugs Bush.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:19 PM
Response to Reply #33
39. Haven't you read some of her columns on Obama?
She just loves emasculating him.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:32 PM
Response to Original message
22. Krugman was a Hillary fan and wrote against O. Mathews loves Obama !
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:34 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. Plus he wants to run for Senate as a Democrat in PA
I expect him to be very partisan this election in our direction.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
26. Finally, bias in OUR favor.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #26
28. SO true - doesn't it feel great to finally have a winner?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Laura PourMeADrink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:36 PM
Response to Reply #25
27. cool. He is brilliant - I wrote him one time - think about the yellowcake
deal, don't remember. He wrote me back a long, personal, hand-written letter. NOT, just kidding.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbluto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:37 PM
Response to Reply #25
30. Krugman run for office?
Really?

That's really surprising!

Where did you hear about this?

I like the guy - but I don't see him as having a surfeit of "Political Charisma" that seems to be the requisite for winning an election.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:38 PM
Response to Reply #30
31. Sorry Tweety
Tweety thinks he can take old Arlen's seat in 2010.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mrbluto Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #31
36. Ah! the axis of the earth....
...just returned to normal.

Suddenly I was in a Bizzaro world where Krugman would actually seek a political office.

Whew.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:37 PM
Response to Original message
29. I think you're right about Tweety - he's ultimately just in it for himself.
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 06:38 PM by NC_Nurse
I think Anderson will be for Obama - if only because he's young. ;-)

I mean, McCain almost looks like an old pirate, y'know.

I think some of them will jump on the Obama train simply because they know it's a new thing. Compared to
dragging around the smelly garbage of the Bush admin. like McCain, Obama is a breath of fresh air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
34. Put Krugman back to Obama...
Yes, he was a strong Clinton supporter, but read anything he's even written outside of his political cheerleading and I don't see any way he's going for McCain.

If the Clinton's point the way even a little bit Stephanopoulus will fall into line and go with Obama.

Beck will be in the hole with Krauthammer diggin for Franco (or maybe Mussolini).

Walter Cronkite will heave himself to his feet one more time and support Obama as best he can.

Edward R. Murrow will rise from the dead and record a plug for Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DeadElephant_ORG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
37. I've got to see this in 2 columns - 1 for each candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:04 PM
Response to Original message
38. Chris Matthews - Chris Matthews
:rofl:

You know him well. :)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
IsItJustMe Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:21 PM
Response to Original message
40. You forgot one group. Faux news = McCain
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 11:17 PM
Response to Reply #40
42. Goes without saying
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 07:43 PM
Response to Original message
41. Ferraro- Hillary
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Wed May 01st 2024, 01:03 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC