Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Saturday's Ruling Changed What?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 02:40 PM
Original message
Saturday's Ruling Changed What?
Did Saturday make any difference in anything? Anything at all?

We still don't have a candidate. It's still up to the SD's to decide. I'm at a loss to find anything that was actually accomplished Saturday.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NightWatcher Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 02:41 PM
Response to Original message
1. Hillary's "hail mary" was an incomplete pass....clock hits ZERO tomorrow
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
2. There was a definite change
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 02:42 PM by IWantAnyDem
Barack Obama needed forty some odd more delegates to win before the ruling and he needed sixty some odd delegates to win after the ruling.

So in effect, the DNC Rules and Bylaws Committee raised the bar on Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
3. It made her supporters even more insane. She had tricked them into thinking
that the MI and FL deals could put her ahead.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:06 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. Well . . .
that was never going to happen. Anyone who truly believed that was either: A) deranged or B) has the last name Clinton.

It's like a baseball manager trying to argue that we shouldn't look at the final score to determine the winner. We should instead look at hits plus walks, divided by ERA, for those games started by a left-hander on Wednesdays.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
EmperorHasNoClothes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 02:54 PM
Response to Original message
4. We got some great YouTube videos out of it!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nadinbrzezinski Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 02:59 PM
Response to Reply #4
6. She's gone VIRAL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #4
15. Poor Harriet.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rocktivity Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 02:58 PM
Response to Original message
5. While I'm relieved that the DNC meant it when they said the delegates would not be seated as is
Edited on Mon Jun-02-08 03:01 PM by rocknation
I fear that in the future, some states may decide that it will be "worth it" to lose delegates to break the rules. Splitting the pledged delegates down the middle and not seating the superdelegates would have been a much more potent deterrent.

:headbang:
rocknation
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:07 PM
Response to Reply #5
8. Oh come on!
We live in a world now where there are no repercussions for anything. Punishment is seen as too harsh, even when deserved. Remember when teachers could discipline kids and the parents would back them up? Now the parents demand that the teacher be fired.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
9. In terms of Obama's magic number he was moved back about 25 delegates
Since then he has gotten about the same and his magic number is now 42.5 versus 44 on Friday.

In terms of clinching the nomination it had no effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ravy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
10. It changed in that the DNC can now apportion state delegates
regardless of how the voters voted.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
hokies4ever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:08 PM
Response to Original message
11. It put a big hamper on a Hillary attempt to take it to the Convention
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
paulk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:11 PM
Response to Original message
12. it changed one thing -
it set a precedent for the idea that you can be given delegates in a race where your name wasn't on the ballot.

In light of the fact that sending those delegates to Denver "uncommitted" wouldn't have really changed anything (Obama still would be the presumptive nominee), it makes a mockery of the entire process as "democratic".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
demokatgurrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
13. It changed absolutely nothing, and that's the way
they wanted it. The committee is a bunch of cowards who didn't want to take any kind of stand, and made the "decision" that would have the least effect.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #13
16. DING DING DING
We have a winner!

The committee did not want to help either side, nor have any real impact. So it sat on its hands, found some comfortable middle ground, and did the least controversial thing possible.

Boy it would be nice to have LEADERS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jenmito Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Jun-02-08 03:12 PM
Response to Original message
14. Hillary was hoping for full seating of all the delegates (with full votes each).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 10:52 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC