Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Interesting: Obama DOES NOT get to pick his own VP candidate

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
SlipperySlope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:28 PM
Original message
Interesting: Obama DOES NOT get to pick his own VP candidate
Silly old me, I just assumed that when Obama gets the nomination, he would get his choice of running mate.

Reading the rules, I see that is not actually what happens.

http://www.democrats.org/page/-/pdf/FINAL2008CalltotheConvention.pdf

Nomination of the Democratic candidate for President, and nomination of the Democratic candidate for Vice President, take place through two separate balloting procedures.

It is entirely conceivable that Obama could be forced by the delegates to accept a running mate not of his own selection.

Now, wouldn't that be a hoot.

:puke:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
rateyes Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Won't happen. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
2. It's pretty unlikely they'd confirm him as nominee then rebel against him
Don't worry about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. LBJ was thrust upon JFK...Kerry wanted Gephart.
not out of the realm.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #6
14. But the choice of Edwards was made prior to the convention vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:36 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. As wil this "choice".
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WinkyDink Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:40 PM
Response to Reply #6
20. Where did you get your "info"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:45 PM
Response to Reply #20
24. Your sanitized version of history from that source is decieving.
History rewritten. No surprise.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:56 PM
Response to Reply #24
34. MNDemNY: don't trust www.senate.gov - history is rewritten
Somehow I doubt you even read it, since it goes into considerable detail about the conflicts between Kennedy and Johnson. What's your source, hillaryhub.com? Do you even have a source?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #34
41. I lived it, JFK brought in LBJ not as a magnanimous gesture, but
as an appeasement to southern Dems.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #6
29. Yes, and those cases are exceptional rather than normal
It's not impossible, but improbable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
featherman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:53 PM
Response to Reply #6
33. Not true historically that the convention "forced" Johnson on Kennedy
No reason to keep repeating the historically unfactual. This is all well documented.

Many in Kennedy's inner circle including Bobby did not want Johnson but it was Kennedy who made the decision to offer the position to Johnson. Many were surprised when Johnson accepted and many wished he hadn't. But it was Kennedy who had made the choice to offer. It was NOT forced on him by the convention, the party, or the delegates. It was a political calculation and a good one. Kennedy needed Johnson. Whether Obama needs Clinton is a matter of debate. But the convention that nominates Obama WILL NOT go against his choice of VP if it is other than Clinton. Anyone thinking this is delusional.

"On July 13, 1960, the Democratic convention nominated Kennedy as its candidate for President. Kennedy asked Johnson to be his Vice Presidential candidate, despite opposition from many liberal delegates and Kennedy's own staff, including Robert Kennedy. He needed Johnson's strength in the South to win what was considered likely to be the closest election since 1916"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/John_F._Kennedy
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
FlyingSquirrel Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:01 PM
Response to Reply #6
37. JFK felt he had to ask, and expected LBJ to say no.
So he got an unpleasant surprise. Obama could learn from that historical occurrence.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #37
44. I heard LBJ was going to say no too, until one of his friends pointed out that this was his only...
chance at the top spot...

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:41 PM
Response to Reply #6
43. Kerry would have won with Gephardt too
but OMG, what a boring couple that would have been.

Snoozing for 4 years, but at least we wouldn't have Roberts or Alito.

David
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
3. i thought everyone knew this..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
4. And what do you think the party might do in that situation?
:D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. they would never do that
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:32 PM
Response to Reply #5
7. Would, and have, many times.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:39 PM
Response to Reply #7
18. I'm talking about this set of Superdelegates in this election
not a chance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:43 PM
Response to Reply #18
22. Big chance.
But if HRC is the VP "choice" you'll just rally around your guy, and praise him for his fine choice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thoughtcrime1984 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:47 PM
Response to Reply #22
26. I'd be concerned about his judgment at that point.
I'll always take the Dem ticket, but that'd set off a red flag with me concerning his judgment, for sure.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
virtualobserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #22
32. he won't choose her
but I would accept it if he did.....I just wouldn't be happy about it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
8. Its not that simple. There would only be one likely VP nominee to vote on.
In addition, pledged delegates who are the ones who attend the convention and vote are basically die hard candidate supporters so I see Obama supporters as unlikely to reject his choice for VP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
9. Who puts forth the name of the VP candidate?
The nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SlipperySlope Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
12. Any 200 delegates
Any 200 delegates can put forth another VP nominee.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Secret_Society Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:35 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. Any one can nominate a candidate from the floor
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Secret_Society Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. Good article on RCP
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TornadoTN Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:35 PM
Response to Original message
11. Has and can happen, but I don't think they'll risk it this time
With the fractious nature of this contest and the level of disgust people have reached, I seriously doubt they would force a VP nomination on the Presidential candidate.

I don't think they want another debacle on their hands should they choose the V.P. for the candidate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
16. It won't come to this...Hillary will twist a few arms behind the scenes if she wants the Veep slot.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #16
17. If she wants it it's hers. That's a fact.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:58 PM
Response to Reply #17
35. Is that right.
You know, I hope she does get nominated by a floor vote - and defeated. But somehow I suspect you won't be posting here by then.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:43 PM
Response to Reply #35
45. I don't want her either, but that's the way it is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:31 PM
Response to Reply #35
48. I suspect...
...a lot of Obama people getting tossed out on their asses also.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DemVet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:30 PM
Response to Reply #17
47. True.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Doityourself Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:39 PM
Response to Original message
19. Clinton's theme song is definitely from Dream Girls: I'm Telling You, I'm Not Going..lol.
Edited on Thu May-22-08 03:40 PM by Doityourself
Lyrics:

And I am telling you
I'm not going.
You're the best man I'll ever know.
There's no way I can ever go,
No, no, no, no way,
No, no, no, no way I'm livin' without you.
I'm not livin' without you.
I don't want to be free.
I'm stayin',
I'm stayin',
And you, and you, you're gonna love me.
Ooh, you're gonna love me.


And I am telling you
I'm not going,
Even though the rough times are showing.
There's just no way,
There's no way.
We're part of the same place.
We're part of the same time.
We both share the same blood.
We both have the same mind.
And time and time we have so much to share,
No, no, no,
No, no, no,
I'm not wakin' up tomorrow mornin'
And findin' that there's nobody there.
Darling, there's no way,
No, no, no, no way I'm livin' without you.
I'm not livin' without you.
You see, there's just no way,
There's no way.

Tear down the mountains,
Yell, scream and shout.
You can say what you want,
I'm not walkin' out.
Stop all the rivers,
Push, strike, and kill.
I'm not gonna leave you,
There's no way I will.

And I am telling you
I'm not going.
You're the best man I'll ever know.
There's no way I can ever, ever go,
No, no, no, no way,
No, no, no, no way I'm livin' without you.
Oh, I'm not livin' without you,
I'm not livin' without you.
I don't wanna be free.
I'm stayin',
I'm stayin',
And you, and you,
You're gonna love me.
Oh, hey, you're gonna love me,

Yes, ah, ooh, ooh, love me,
Ooh, ooh, ooh, love me,
Love me,
Love me,
Love me,
Love me.
You're gonna love me.



Pretty pathetic. Poor Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:42 PM
Response to Original message
21. amazing what happens, when you acutally READ!
Obama...Barack Obama, RAN TV ADS IN FL DURING THE SUPER BOWL!!! THINK ABOUT IT!! YOU YOUR DEM F*CKING BRAINS>>>>>NOT YOUR HEARTS! HE BROKE THE ROOOOOLLZZZZ! IN MI! His name WAS on the ballot! HE CHOSE (NOT IN THE ROOOOLZ) to take his name off for HIS OWN POLITICAL GAIN>>>>Which backfired! HE has ZERO problem Disenfranchising MILLIONS OF VOTERS! HIS History of this goes back to his campaign in Chicago! He is NO DEMOCRAT IF YOU ASK ME!!!!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DontBlameMe Donating Member (889 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:50 PM
Response to Reply #21
30. Oh, please!
God bless you for supporting your candidate.

But, please, shut up. Just shut up.

His ads were sanctioned by the DNC person (I think she was from Georgia???) in the region. He couldn't run a national ad on those channels without them running in Florida. You know this. Why are you spreading bullshit?

You guys are really starting to make me sick.

Fuck me, why do I even bother.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #30
38. NO NO NO! When they bought them...they KNEW!
They KNEW it would BLEED into the FL market...JUST in time.
WHAT about his ROOOL BREAKING PRESS Conference??? Get REAL or be considered someone who condone disenfranchising MILLIONS of Voter! feel better? does THAT make you feel better?


Which is more important?? technicality's and permanent damage to our party..OR DO THE RIGHT THING>.AND COUNT THE VOTES???????


300x250

PS..I live in FL and Voted along with RECORD TURNOUT EDUCATED VOTERS I KNEW WHO BO) WAS...PALEEZE!!!!!!......GUESS WHAT ...WE VOTED FOR HILLARY!..and YES!!! I'm pissed!


OH< What about NH...SC...IA...THEY ALL BROKE THE ROOOLZ AS WELL! IS BO ready to relinquish the DEL's he picked up..? huh? ROOLZ R ROOLZ?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:53 AM
Response to Reply #30
51. Why would one state party official be allowed
to give him "permission"?

That's the lamest excuse you guys use. IF Clinton had run ads there, we'd hear about it 100 times a day, every day. You'd scream about what a horrible, rotten liar she is.

Yet Obama very clearly violated the pledge - the pledge which had no provision for getting "permission" from anybody to break.

He didn't NEED to run national ads two days before the Florida primary - nobody else did! He very specifically, very clearly violated the pledge and you guys try to accuse Clinton of breaking it by inventing provisions that don't exist.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:44 PM
Response to Original message
23. amazing what happens when, you actually READ!
Obama...Barack Obama, RAN TV ADS IN FL DURING THE SUPER BOWL!!! THINK ABOUT IT!! UES YOUR DEM F*CKING BRAINS ( I'm pissed!!)>>>>>NOT YOUR HEARTS! HE BROKE THE ROOOOOLLZZZZ! IN MI! His name WAS on the ballot! HE CHOSE (NOT IN THE ROOOOLZ) to take his name off for HIS OWN POLITICAL GAIN>>>>Which backfired! HE has ZERO problem Disenfranchising MILLIONS OF VOTERS! HIS History of this goes back to his campaign in Chicago! He is NO DEMOCRAT IF YOU ASK ME!!!!!



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anigbrowl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:00 PM
Response to Reply #23
36. This is why you shouldn't use Meth, kids
It makes you look like a clinically insane person.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
indimuse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #36
39. grow a brain!
..

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:41 PM
Response to Reply #36
50. +1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4_Legs_Good Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:46 PM
Response to Reply #23
46. Give me a f*cking break
My dem f*cking brain don't work.

Bzzzzztttttfffapzasdfhfhas;dlfkj

:eyes:

David

/ignore
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
25. have to wonder about the cnn crawl that said obama was engaged in a "top-secret search" for his
running mate.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
niyad Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:47 PM
Response to Original message
27. self-delete--dupe
Edited on Thu May-22-08 04:04 PM by niyad
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
me b zola Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
28. This, I think, is why there are reports of Obama's beginning the process
of choosing his VP. He will choose a VP well in advance of the convention and will already be campaigning with her/him.

Obama is neither weak or naive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 03:50 PM
Response to Original message
31. "Barbara Boxer dismissed the idea of the party forcing Clinton on the ticket."
Boxer dismissed the idea of the party forcing Clinton on the ticket as vice president as a way to bridge the divide.

"Barack Obama will pick whoever he wants," Boxer said. "That's a very important choice for the president. If he is the nominee, then he is going to choose his running mate. And no one really can tell him who it ought to be."

The decision, she said, will be based on how Obama views the vice presidency and the role it would play in his administration, and what would strengthen his chances in the election, among many other factors.

"The last thing I'd ever do is tell someone who I think would be the best choice, because that is really something that is the nominee's choice," Boxer said.

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/05/16/MNIQ10NRE8.DTL
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pab Sungenis Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:27 PM
Response to Original message
40. The party has ratified every Presidential Nominee's choice of running mate since 1960.
Last time the convention chose a VP candidate was 1956 when they voted for Kefauver over Kennedy after Stevenson called for an open vote.

In 1952, Stevenson was a draft choice, so he hadn't selected a running mate in advance.

In 1944, the convention balked at renominating Henry Wallace (who Roosevelt had twisted their arms into selecting in 1940), and nominated Truman over Roosevelt's second choice, Jimmy Byrnes.

Before that, you're into the era of brokered conventions, and few candidates had time to pick their running mates in advance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
apocalypsehow Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:37 PM
Response to Original message
42. In theory, yes. But in practice here's what happens:
After the presidential nominee is certified, the candidates who opposed him/her in the primary traditionally "release" their delegates to the nominee. This effectively squelchs any chance for a "floor protest." At this point, the entire thing becomes one big rubber stamp for whatever the nominee wants. The only way this scenario could be derailed is if HRC refuses to do the decent thing and release her delegates, but even then all that would happen is that her delegates, being outnumbered, would get voted down on roll call vote after vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 07:35 PM
Response to Original message
49. Tradition holds that the Nominee chooses the VP
That won't change just because Hilly has her Mad on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:54 AM
Response to Original message
52. If Obama has enough delegates to win the nomination, he has enough delegates to control the floor
of the convention. Why don't people get this??
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
burythehatchet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 08:57 AM
Response to Original message
53. In retrospect, I have to consider whether Gore wanted Lieberman or if lowly Joe
Edited on Fri May-23-08 08:57 AM by burythehatchet
was simply an insurance policy for the neo-cons in the event they weren't able to install Boosh.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tinksrival Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 09:01 AM
Response to Original message
54. What a load!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:41 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC