Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Hillary supporters know that if Florida and Michigan are counted as is that Obama wins anyway right?

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 11:46 AM
Original message
Hillary supporters know that if Florida and Michigan are counted as is that Obama wins anyway right?
Just saying. Seems like a lot of energy is being wasted by them on this fight.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 11:52 AM
Response to Original message
1. I'd bet money, if I had any, that they're building their own 527s or PACs or what have you
inside the Obama campaign, MoveOn-style.

She WILL be back.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 11:56 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I don't understand what you mean...
... maybe I am so busy I am a little obtuse.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
patrice Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #3
8. Obama's web-tool is wide open to anyone who wants to use it. It's all about networking and the
whole "Independent" and "Cross-over" phenomenon.

Yeah, those who see the hand-writing on the wall are probably even supporting his candidacy, especially in states that have already voted. But, a few people who know one another can also build relationships and work together independent from the Obama campaign.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 11:55 AM
Response to Original message
2. Who are the "uncommitted" from Michigan? These are PEOPLE, not just numbers.
Unclear how they would vote. That explains Obama's hesitance.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
msallied Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 11:57 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Well they obviously aren't votes for Hillary.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 11:59 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Why is that obvious???
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Warren DeMontague Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #5
12. Because unlike Obama, her name was actually ON THE BALLOT in Michigan.
Anyone who wanted to vote for Hillary, voted for Hillary.

I suspect more than a few of them have changed their minds, since then, actualy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 01:18 PM
Response to Reply #12
17. Many of the "undeclared" are union members for Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
haymakeragain Donating Member (841 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 01:20 PM
Response to Reply #17
18. That decided to vote undeclared instead of just voting for Hillary?
Is there any reach to far for you guys? Damn.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 01:23 PM
Response to Reply #18
20. No they wanted to be delegates to the convention. Ever been one?
I have, elected as an "uncommitted" It's a strategy game.Say what you want about the Clintons, but they are good at that.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ganja Ninja Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #17
19. Now why would they vote undeclared when Hillary's name was
on the ballot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MNDemNY Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 01:25 PM
Response to Reply #19
21. You have it upside down.
Edited on Thu May-22-08 01:25 PM by MNDemNY
They RAN as uncommitted, to get a seat at the convention. It's more common then you think.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
damntexdem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:01 PM
Response to Original message
6. No, they want to make a bogus "popular vote" claim.
And they can't begin to make it unless they can use their own math, including counting all Clinton votes from FL and MI. They toss out all caucus results as not being "votes" -- even though attending a caucus involves much-greater dedication than simply voting. And they plan in include the popular vote from Puerto Rico, which they expect to be heavily pro-HRC. Then they'll make whatever other 'adjustments' necessary to give Hillary a "majority of the popular vote," and claim that that should outweigh earned pledged delegates.

It's the butterfly ballot, hanging chads, and felonious SCOTUS intervention all rolled into one HRC strategy to change the rules enough that Hillary "wins" the nomination.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:59 PM
Response to Reply #6
11. They can make that claim all they want. The superdelegates have known all about it for months.
They are still going in droves to Obama.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Growler Donating Member (896 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. Their claims are utter nonsense
AND they know it. At this point they are intentionally sowing dischord.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oleladylib Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:17 PM
Response to Original message
9. You had better read the early warning signs for Obama on CNN!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:57 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. Do they change the delegate calculus? Id like this OP/thread to stay focused.
If you want to discuss other things, lets start another OP.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truebrit71 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 12:59 PM
Response to Original message
13. That's why this whole "let the votes" count bullshit ACTUALLY means "let the votes FOR ME"...
..count and no-one else...

She's looking to have her cake and eat it too...

100% disingenuous, and 1 million % despicable...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
WeDidIt Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 01:00 PM
Response to Original message
14. The idea is to get it to within 100 delegates
then fight it on the floor at the convention.

They beleive they can win a floor fight if they pledged delegate lead is under 100.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #14
23. If this goes to a Floor fight, best to look forward to 2016 and get used to President McSame (n/t)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
2rth2pwr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 01:02 PM
Response to Original message
15. Then what's the big deal? Why is every Obama supporter acting hysterical?
Just seat them and move on.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tommy_Carcetti Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 01:11 PM
Response to Original message
16. It isn't about any candidate.
It's about doing the right thing.

Obama will almost certainly be our nominee. And I've got absolutely no problem with that. I like the man personally and as a politician. (Some of his supporters, well....)

I just want to say that I was a part of the process that nominated him. That's all I want. It's pretty simple.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Thu May-22-08 01:57 PM
Response to Reply #16
22. That is going to happen regardless of any action by Hillary supporters.
The rules committee is going to meet and going to decide this on May 31. If everyone sat on their hands and did nothing, they would do that. If we all jump up and down and scream, they are still going to do it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stevenleser Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-23-08 09:30 AM
Response to Original message
24. Kick
:kick:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 05:51 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC