He's basically writing off Teddy Kennedy as dead with no evidence WHATSOEVER!
First of all, let me point out that he has no medical training. Which is good, because if he did, he should probably lose his license for his approach to this situation.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_BazellI'd also like to point out that he most certainly has NO ACCESS to Kennedy's medical records, nor do these so-called "experts" that he's supposedly talking to.
Thus, he has no idea:
-What kind of glioma this is. There are several types of gliomas, representing the various classes of "glial" cells. The type of glioma profoundly affects prognosis.
-The grade of the glioma, i.e. how aggressive the tumor is. This enormously impacts prognosis.
-The size of the glioma. This will largely determine whether or not surgery is a viable option, which also affects prognosis.
-The depth of the glioma. Again, a surgical consideration.
And there are other, more molecular considerations as well.
http://www.abta.org/index.cfm?contentid=230Let me repeat...NO ONE HAS ACCESS TO ANY OF THIS INFORMATION!
Hell, I guarantee you that his biopsy specimens are still currently under the microscopes of at least two neuropathologists. These diagnoses take time!
So this Bazell guy is talking out of his ass. His "experts" have told him what the average diagnosis/prognosis is of a guy Kennedy's age and he's regurgitating that as fact.
But it is NOT yet fact and all of this discussion of a "grim" prognosis and discussing Kennedy in the past tense is disgustingly premature.
:rant:
Thanks. There's a special place on my shit list for media science hacks. And this guy has mentioned Kennedy's "breast cancer" no less than five times this afternoon. :grr: