HRC people still posting negative BO stuff

[datopbanana]

Is it to:

A. Change peoples minds in Puerto Rico, Montana, and/or South Dakota?

B. Get your last shots in before BO becomes the nominee?

[mcctatas]

1. It's better than kicking thier dogs?

:shrug:

[splat]

2. So not everybody likes him -- that's politics

[datopbanana]

3. I'll put you down for "No response"?

[splat]

7. Ah, only a choice of your two views is a response? How Obamacratic

[datopbanana]

9. What is your choice?

[Name removed]

13. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[datopbanana]

17. I'm adding an "other" option for you. Write in your response splat...

But I'm guessing you have no good reason.

[splat]

25. I already posted my response -- your machine spit it back out

[datopbanana]

26. Yeah you said you don't like him. So you post negative stuff to hurt his feelings?

[chascarrillo]

23. You're not posting to change peoples minds in Puerto Rico, Montana, and/or South Dakota?

I'm listening.

[SoonerPride]

52. The clock is ticking then. This place will tombstone you soon enough

Enjoy your stay.

It is short lived.

[MrSlayer]

4. They aren't changing any minds.

So "B" seems likely.

[cboy4]

5. Nobody is posting negative BO stuff, because Hillary Clinton

voters have been bullied away into the night by Obama fans == because these fans do not like hearing views that differ from their own.

[Name removed]

10. Deleted message

Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.

[kenny blankenship]

18. Now, now, "liar" is such a harsh term

He misspoke I'm sure. He says a lot of things - millions of words a day. So if he misspoke that was just a misstatement.

[datopbanana]

12. People are posting negative stuff. So I'll mark you down as "detached from reality"

[democracy1st]

14. No wonder your azz doesn't see anything wrong with Hillary & Scaife getting together

[Warren Stupidity]

36. Have you actually looked at the posts here on GDP?

The bashing of both candidates continues.

[mkultra]

72. thats incorrect

Check out OPERATIONMINDCRIME hes one of your foot soldiers.

[Ytzak]

6. Its because they are bitter people with only their religion and a colt 45...

to rely on.

Don't know whether you mean her people personally, or her tortured angry supporters who have not yet completed the second stage of grief.

[Douglas Carpenter]

8. Stages of grief: 1. Denial 2. Anger 3. Acceptance

I do wish they would get on with it though without engaging in destructive behavior.

It's very unbecoming.

Sen. Obama was NOT my first choice either,

But sheesh!

[Beacool]

15. Acceptance??????

Never!!!!!!

[mcctatas]

16. Lovely....

so I guess we can count you as one of the feminists who doesn't give a shit about womens repro rights?

[Beacool]

48. No, just one who won't vote for Obama.

Unless there's a true unity ticket and the two people who each won half of the Democratic votes run together.

Otherwise, I'm done with this election. No more campaigning, no more donations and no more fundraisers.

[DevonRex]

50. One more person on ignore. Thanks Bea for spelling it out so

clearly. See, the only folks I have on ignore are those who say they will not vote for Obama in the GE.

[Beacool]

51. If you can't handle dissension

what's the point of having a democracy?

I have no one on ignore.

[Occam Bandage]

54. If you'd rather see John McCain elected then a Democrat,

what's the point of being on DU?

[Beacool]

56. I have never said that I would vote for McCain. n/t

[Occam Bandage]

57. Doesn't matter. If you're not voting for the Democrat, you're enabling McCain.

[ampad]

58. You don't need to put anyone on ignore

Come next week when this is sewn up and you pop off with that crap you will be gone. Why put people on ignore when you are on the fast track out of here?

[Beacool]

63. Not so fast,

he's still not the nominee. When he is, then we'll talk.

[Tesha]

68. 'Til tomorrow, then.

WHen it works out that Hillary will have to win
105% of the remaining pledged delegates...

Tesha

[Occam Bandage]

53. So I take it you've had enough of Roe v. Wade, then?

And that you're on board for an invasion of Iran?
And that you have no interest in health-care reform?

[SoFlaJet]

60. and no more posting on DU

...pretty soon it seems

[hokies4ever]

20. You're still in denial

:rofl:

[Beacool]

49. Nope, I'm sure that Obama will be the nominee.

That doesn't mean that I have to vote for him.

:shrug:

[mkultra]

73. you forgot bargaining

[Rageneau]

11. What negative stuff are you refering to?

[anonymous171]

19. PR is a must win for democrats in the fall!

:rofl:

[Andromeda]

21. What's your point?

.

[datopbanana]

22. It's a question.

[emilyg]

24. So what?

[datopbanana]

27. That doesn't answer the question.

Or make any sense.

[emilyg]

28. That's all the reponse your question gets from me.

[datopbanana]

30. So there is no explanation for people posting their negative posts?

That's right.

[emilyg]

66. Probably the same reason

negative posts about Clinton appear.

[Life Long Dem]

29. B, are the ones, because they will be leaving soon, and want to

keep us divided and basically be the assholes that they are. So anyone can suck up to them if they want. But they have no intention of sticking around anyway.

And the ones who will be sticking around need to save the presumed nominee from damage you yourself would rather not see, or you yourself had and have no intention of staying with the Democratic party as well.

[2rth2pwr]

31. BO people still posting negative HRC stuff

Is it to:

A. Tear her down so she will lose to mcCain and Obama can run in 2012?

2. Let out the last remaining sexist attacks you have left?

[tekisui]

32. To defend the Democratic Nominee, Barack Obama.

[Marrah_G]

34. He is not the nominee yet and most if it has shit to do with defending Obama

[Marrah_G]

33. And there is still far more anit- Clinton posts. Nice flamebait- IBTL

[shadowknows69]

35. Most of the anti Clinton posts today are about her latest fuckaroo bowing to Karl Rove

Something timely and relevant and easily proven, like the sniper lies, unlike the threads I've seen lately about Rezco, the imaginary sexism of the Obama campaign and other non-issue attack threads. Being that this forum is overwhelmingly in support of Obama you would think you couldn't get an thread attacking Obama to stay on the main page but y'all keep kicking them up.

[rodeodance]

37. *****"BHO people still posting negative Hillary stuff"******

[MethuenProgressive]

45. See the so-called "Greatest Page" aka "Loyal Society of HillHaters Festival"

The Bandwagon took a Right turn into the sewer months ago.

[MethuenProgressive]

38. 18 Million (so far) Democratic voters have voted for someone other than Obama.

In case you've forgotten.

[Tesha]

41. But they'll vote for Barack soon, even if he wasn't their first choice.

Well, 17,999,999 probably will, but maybe you won't, ehh?

Tesha

[MethuenProgressive]

44. I'm really sick of that slur from you Obama followers.

Link please, to any post I've ever made saying I won't vote for our nominee. You'll find dozens of posts of mine going back well over a year saying I'll vote for our nominee, no matter who it was. I was saying so long before the HillHaters took over DU, and long before Obama rose above 20% in DU primary polls.

A similar search will show you hundreds of DU posts saying that members won't vote for our nominee if it was Clinton. Every single one of those people should be tombstoned. We're better off without those anti-Democratic Party persons.

[Tesha]

67. You're speaking to me.

> A similar search will show you hundreds of DU posts saying that
> members won't vote for our nominee if it was Clinton. Every single
> one of those people should be tombstoned. We're better off without
> those anti-Democratic Party persons.

You're speakingto one of those people. Since her IWR vote,
I've been stating that I will *NEVER* vote for Hillary.
But for two reasons, I really don' think I deserve
tombstoning:

1. All along the way, I've been at least guardedly
optimistic that Hillary would *NEVER* be our nominee.
The party would be foolish to nominate anyone with
her negatives. So I felt safe that my ethics would
never be tested by actually being presented with the
opportunity to vote for her in the General Election.

2. If, somehow, she *HAD* won the nomination or even
reached the point that Obama reached *LONG AGO*, I
would have been willing to sit down and shut up about
it (certainly at least here at DU). I would *NOT* have
continued to trash her with post after post, three
posts per day. And I wouldn't have expected anyone
to *ALLOW* me to do that, either.

But the trashing of our nominee is what's going on here
and the sooner it is stopped (by the trashers or by
the administrators), the better.

Tesha

[NashVegas]

39. So?

[Tesha]

40. It will be over soon.

I predict about a dozen tombstones in prompt order
because it's clear that the loudest folks simply
won't be able to cope.

Tesha

[Orsino]

42. Perhaps they're just airing their views, as most of the rest of us are.

No worries.

[LizW]

43. What are you TALKING about???

Can you really not see the 20 or so anti-Hillary posts on the front page of GD/P? I just scrolled down to the bottom of the page and the page and found exactly ONE anti-Obama post.

That's not even getting into the creepy, Hillary-obsessed posts within each thread. I swear, if Hillary dropped out today, this place would grind to a halt, because some folks would have nothing, absolutely nothing to talk about any more.

[MethuenProgressive]

47. There's a reason you saw only one anti-Obama thread.

Anything that is not HillHate or BarackWorship is attacked and flamed up until the mods are forced to lock it.

[Perry Logan]

46. Obama people still posting negative Hillary stuff.

But I'm not asking why. It's obviously a compusion.

[Blondbostonian]

59. Give me a break

You live to post negative Obama material.

I don't care who you vote for either.

[Aloha Spirit]

55. Take the pledge. Be nice for a change.

[ampad]

61. Trying to get the last digs in

Notice how when you call them on their shit it is all of a sudden flame bait, I'm sure some have already alerted. They don't like to see their own shit out there like this. They are not going to change any minds they are just spouting off before the forum is closed. I predict that at least a dozen of them will not be able to help themselves and will either leave on their own or be kicked out. I have most of them on ignore but the ones I don't have on ignore are amusing as hell. I have never seen so many whining, adults in my life.

[wowimthere]

62. two things are happening... looking forward to 2012. Give GOP enough ammo to dismantle Obama

She is trying to rip him apart subtly by pinning the memes "He's black, I won big states, math is unimportant", because she really believes this will work in the end... and as he assumes the Democratic nominee status she will unite with the Obama camp to unite the party and hope that the GOP will take up where she left off. Her thinking: She looks good come 2012 as she hopes the perception that she was the stronger candidate will stick if Obama should lose the GE. In the event that Obama loses (ain't gonna happen) she can say, "see I told you I was the stronger candidate, now anoint me in 2012.

[Cheap_Trick]

64. I don't know what the fuck makes these idiots think that she has a chance in 2012

when she stunk up the joint so badly this time around and burnt so many bridges. She's toast this time. Next time she's not even going to be able to get into the toaster.

[EnviroBat]

71. They refuse to do any research in to her convenient associations.

Penn? Scaiffe? This shill is all but married to the GOP, and yet they refuse to see it.

"Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary Hillary"!!!!!!!

[McCamy Taylor]

65. C. Response to BO people still posting negative Clinton stuff?

For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction.

[ShortnFiery]

69. Are they using any "dog whistles" in Puerto Rico to pit Brown against Black Peoples?

I wouldn't hold it past The Clintons. They've been playing that Southern Strategy since 1989 when they were sued by the NAACP for intimidating AA at the polls. :wow:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8oRwZQLdhEw

[Bensthename]

70. I just cant wait to for them to be pissed off when he whens the Gen Election..

:evilgrin: