Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

I welcome the racist and racial attacks against Obama from the right.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 03:46 PM
Original message
I welcome the racist and racial attacks against Obama from the right.
The more stories in the MSM about race, the more discredited become the tired old politics of fear and division. Obama has not only the credentials, he has the story to tell about the unassailable truth that we're finally ready to look at our own prejudices and grow beyond them.

The "hard working white people" need to have their mirrors handy.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
1. Be careful what you wish for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #1
9. Nothing ventured, nothing gained. The upcoming election is a referendum on the American character...
The fear of failing is NOT a good reason to not take the test.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #9
13. DING DING DING We have a winner!!! That's exactly right.
Bring it.

This is a referendum on the treatment of minorities throughout this nation.

I want to see if my hopes or fears are confirmed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #9
15. I just have a different take....


I understand that exposure is a GOOD thing, but creating a climate where ugliness is invited or encouraged by anyone doesn't seem to be a good idea.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
papau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:29 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. I agree - and there's no official GOP race comments - just the GOP owned media
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 05:12 PM
Response to Reply #15
21. If having a black candidate = "ugliness is invited or encouraged"...
the you're just putting verbal lipstick on the racist pig.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 05:17 PM
Response to Reply #21
23. sigh...ok whatever
:eyes:

Obviously your point of view is the only valid one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 05:20 PM
Response to Reply #23
24. And you could've saved yourself a lot of hassle by acknowledging that from the get-go!
:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldpol Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
10. they've already started the attacks... Michelle Obama is Angry — “Whitey is still holding us down…”
Michelle Obama’s tales of woe
By Byron York
Posted: 05/07/08 06:39 PM

I took in the Michelle Obama Show this week in Charlotte, N.C.

The wife of Sen. Barack Obama (D-Ill.) was in town for an election-eve get-out-the-vote rally, to make sure that Obama voters were fired up and ready to go for Tuesday’s primary.

Usually, such events are rah-rah, go-team affairs. But Mrs. Obama’s appearance was a little different.

It was an hour-long tale of resentment and anger.

First, she complained at great length that her husband had been treated unfairly in the Democratic presidential race. Every time he made a move forward, she said, “they” — she never spelled out exactly who “they” were — moved the goalposts a bit farther away from him.

First, “they” said he couldn’t raise the money necessary to run a big-league campaign.

But “once he proved that he could raise the money, then all of a sudden money didn’t matter,” Mrs. Obama told the crowd. “Everybody said, ‘Well, money isn’t important.’ ”

Then “they” said the test for Obama would be whether he could build a political organization. But “once it was built, they said it’s not an organization — the stakes changed again.”

Next, “they” said Obama had to win Iowa. But “once he won Iowa, then all of a sudden Iowa was no longer important.”

“They” had moved the bar again. This time, Obama had to win a primary state.

“Then we rolled into South Carolina,” Mrs. Obama said. “Then you know what they said? They said South Carolina didn’t count, because Barack was supposed to win.”

Then came Super Tuesday, and after that Obama’s stretch of victories in a series of primary and caucus states.

Still, Mrs. Obama complained, “they” tried to undermine her husband every step of the way.

“We’ve learned that we’re still living in a time and in a nation where the bar is set, right?” she said.

“They tell you all you need to do is do these things and you’ll get to the bar, so you go about the business of doing those things.

“You start working hard and sacrificing, and you think you’re getting closer to the bar, you’re working and you’re struggling, you get right to that bar, you’re reaching out for the bar, and then what happens?

“They raise the bar. Raise the bar. Shift it to the side. Keep it just out of reach.

“And that’s just what’s been happening in this race.”

All the while, the crowd cheered as Mrs. Obama listed one supposed injustice after another.

Now, it should be noted that her husband was, at that moment, on the verge of a blowout victory in North Carolina, one that would spur new calls for his opponent to drop out of the race.

So you might have thought Michelle Obama would be a pretty happy camper.

Instead, you got the sense that she was angry that the Democratic Party did not, at some early point in the race, simply award her husband the nomination by acclamation.

Instead, he had to face an opponent who — get this — really wanted to win it for herself.

Mrs. Obama had lots of other complaints, too.

She’s irritated at those people who have suggested that she and Sen. Obama are elitists.

And she appears to be still outraged — at this late date — by the fact that she had to take out loans to attend Princeton and Harvard Law School.

It took her years to pay them back, something she has kvetched about in numerous public appearances.

Imagine that! First she had to borrow money to go to some of the world’s most selective and expensive schools — schools whose graduates usually do pretty well in the world — and then they made her pay it back.

There “they” go again.

If you’re wondering how that negative message went across in Charlotte, the answer is, it went over very well.

This was as pro-Obama a crowd as you could find in a decidedly pro-Obama state.

So look for Mrs. Obama to continue sending out her message of dissatisfaction and resentment.

She appears to have begun the presidential race in an angry mood, and, despite her husband’s extraordinary success, it looks like she’ll finish it angry, too.

York is a White House correspondent for National Review. His column appears in The Hill each week. E-mail: byork@thehill.com

Michelle Obama is angry. “They” made her repay those college loans for her Princeton-Harvard Education. She’s angry that the path to the White House wasn’t carved out in a river of gold. She’s angry that Obama and she weren’t handed the keys to a platinum yacht to dock outside of the White House after being handed the keys to the White House in a no contest election.

I suppose she wants no election. She thinks that because Obama is black that he should be given the Presidency as reparations for oppression and slavery.

I’d like to know who this “they” is. Who is this nefarious collection of ne’er do wells who stand in the path of Obama. Holding that bar higher and higher. Who is this fantasy shadow group. Maybe “they” are Hillary’s vast right wing conspirators moonlighting in Michelle’s head. Rattling around in there with all of the rest of the loose left marbles.

Michelle Obama, the ever angry, Grinch of Election 2008 who tells us that America is bad except when they make her proud. The ever reproving mother hen clucking at the heels of bad, bad whitey. Jeremiah and Michelle must have had quite a few indoctrination meetings. Michelle is to Obama what Madame Mao was to Mao Zedong. His ever partisan fighter willing to throw everyone to the wolves and to criticize all in the name of her husbands power and prestige.

Yeah, I can’t wait for 4 years of this scrooge in the White House. I’m sure it will be speech after speech of how bad, bad whitey (Congress and the Senate) are holding back faith and hope. We know what’s good for you people. If only they (the Constitution and the SCOTUS) would stop raising the bar and get out of the way. I’m not sure if it is appropriate for a President or First Lady to play themselves off as victims.

Michele Obama is the perpetual victim. She’s been given everything that America can give a person. She has even wisely taken advantage of these gifts and become part of the Elite. She IS the “they” that she rails against so often in her angry speeches.

Yet, still she plays the VICTIM at every turn. Will this be the tactic in their talks with Ahmadinejad and the like. Are they going to turn the tables and play the victim card in Affairs of State as well.

How a person who was given the opportunities that Michelle Obama has been given has the gall to play the victim is beyond me. Nonetheless, Michelle Obama is convinced that “they” (translated: Whitey) is attempting to raise the bar at every avenue to hold Obama down. The guy is on the verge of being the Democratic Candidate for President based primarily upon the color of his skin. He has had overwhelming support. The press has fawned over him as if he is the coming of the Once and Future King. Yet, “they” are holding Obama down. “They” are raising the bar.

Who is this “they?”

Lose the victim shtick, Michelle. It’s unbecoming of a prospective 1st Lady. Reach out in a real and meaningful way and try to act as if you know the meaning of the word dignity.
http://hereticdhammasangha.wordpress.com/2008/05/11/michelle-obama-is-angry-whitey-is-still-holding-us-down/
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
16. Why? As a black woman
Edited on Fri May-16-08 04:22 PM by CakeGrrl
I don't think there's anything I haven't heard, firsthand or otherwise.

We've seen what happens to agents of change. If we keep getting cowed by that, there will be no progress.

Let the Republicans show how craven and racist they are or want to be. Too many people don't really believe there's much of a race problem because they don't see it firsthand. This campaign will drag it out into the light of day - it's already begun.

I'm waiting for someone to finally crack and bust out the n-word on the air.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
oldpol Donating Member (383 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:31 PM
Response to Reply #16
18. "I'm waiting for someone to finally crack and bust out the n-word live on the air"
Edited on Fri May-16-08 04:31 PM by oldpol
odds: Pat Buchanan 2-1, O'Reilly/Hannity 3-1, Limbaugh 4-1
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TahitiNut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #18
30. I'd say Bay Buchanan and Ann Coulter are far more likely to drop the 'N-bomb' than those listed.
Both are filthy slugs.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
navarth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 03:48 PM
Response to Original message
2.  You might be right...time will tell.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BOSSHOG Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
3. Hopefully
anything said about Obama will not be characterized as racist or racism. That results in an incredible dilution and will only allow expert campaigners to paint themselves in the colors of victimology.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
w13rd0 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 03:53 PM
Response to Original message
4. No one wants to be the butt of a joke...
...art can drive culture, and if from what I've seen over the past seven years is any indication, I think we could turn out ok.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 03:56 PM
Response to Original message
5. I don't welcome them, because they create HATE.
I agree that the stories paint the Republican party for what it is - a bunch of racist white men who don't have to be scratched very hard to reveal that racism below their veneer of civilization.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:02 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. I believe that painting will illuminate a most important conversation in this General Election
campaign, and that's the one about our own deeply-held fears and prejudices: Where they came from, how they've been denied, and what kind of good hard work we'll do to go beyond them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
skooooo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:17 PM
Response to Reply #6
12. That may be part of it...but it's not the only possible outcome.

I don't want things to get too ugly. There are a lot of crazy people out there, and I don't want a climate where they feel encouraged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasObserver Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:42 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. Agreed. I want an atmosphere where such actions are immediately scorned.
Part of winning the war against racism is making the bastards mumble under their breath instead of saying it out loud. Part of winning is making them stop saying these things in public. It is that hammer that must be wielded to beat down those who so freely ply their racist comments. Beat them down with loud condemnation, and make them grumble to each other in private.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 05:46 PM
Response to Reply #19
26. Not to put too fine a point on it,
I feel the mumbling under their breath has gone on too long without being called out. I want them to stand up and say it loud, and then have to defend why, after these many years, they haven't moved beyond their own racism - and why, more perniciously, they'll DENY racism and get away with it because hardly anyone can hear them mumbling.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mythyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:06 PM
Response to Original message
7. never welcome or invite racism
there's a higher road and higher ground, whereas all this B.S. has roiled in the dregs.

for me, that's the most disappointing thing about this election. given the diversity of the candidates, this was a perfect opportunity for both celebration and dialogue, which is how it seemed things might go early on in the race. but once things got tough, well we all know what happens and continues happening. it's a crying shame if you ask me. fans flames that it could be helping quell....

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:13 PM
Response to Reply #7
8. Perhaps the higher road and higher ground, while keeping many people above the fray
Edited on Fri May-16-08 04:14 PM by Ron_Green
for all these long years (it's been 44 years since the Civil Rights Act, and I could tell you some interesting personal observations about my experiences in the Jim Crow South during that time), have allowed a glossing over of the profound roots of racism and fear of "the Other" in U.S. society.

When the attacks come, as they will, is the golden opportunity for Obama to tell it like it is, as he is singularly qualified to do. Without the attacks, we still have the high road, but where has it brought us so far?


(edit for tpyo):-)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NashVegas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:16 PM
Response to Original message
11. I Have No Doubt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lord Helmet Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 04:19 PM
Response to Original message
14. what about the racist atttacks coming from the Clinton campaign?
I don't welcome those
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
moez Donating Member (638 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 05:07 PM
Response to Original message
20. We don't need to wait for attacks from the right -
Cankles and her followers have been using their racist attacks for months now...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 05:16 PM
Response to Original message
22. That's why Obama's campaign chose the "racist card" strategy
Like the GOP uses terrorism, red-baiting and Dem bashing to galvanize their right wing base, the Obama campaign decided to use the faux racism issue to get his base fired up.

But like any cheap tactic, it's effectiveness wears off pretty quickly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 05:23 PM
Response to Reply #22
25. hahahaha!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 05:48 PM
Response to Original message
27. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Ron Green Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 05:55 PM
Response to Reply #27
28. Explain that, please.
How are you "typical," and how am I showing my own racism? (Which I admit I have some.)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mags Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-16-08 05:57 PM
Response to Reply #28
29. I am a woman, white and hard working.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon Apr 29th 2024, 11:24 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC