Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Chuck Todd is supposed to be doing an online interview thing at noon at newsvine... Sign up and ask

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 10:43 AM
Original message
Chuck Todd is supposed to be doing an online interview thing at noon at newsvine... Sign up and ask
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
Aloha Spirit Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed May-14-08 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
1. Choice responses from Todd:
On Dem. VP: He likes Evan Bayh... the picture of the Bayh family and the Obama family will be very powerful; toss in the fact that Bayh COULD put a red state in play (Indiana) and the fact he's a Clinton person, and you have all the elements Obama will be looking for. Also, Bayh's a team player; you'll never have to worry about that guy being disloyal.

On the popular vote:
well, the popular vote count is an art, not a science. Right now, we haven't given the uncommitted Mich. vote to Obama; there's an argument that maybe we should; but then what about the votes of folks who voted in territories that don't have a vote in the general election (like Guam, America Samoa and Puerto Rico)? Should those votes count? I haven't included them yet but the Clinton campaign is pushing hard that we do. The bottom line on the popular vote, it's CLOSE; VERYCLOSE and the ultimate winner will have won about half of the Dem primary vote and the ultimate loser will have won about half the primary vote. Had every caucus been a primary, Obama would have a bigger popular vote lead but a smaller pledged delegate lead; Had California been held two weeks later; he might win it; had my aunt had a youknowwhat, she'd be my uncle...there's no accurate popular vote count; it's apparently like pornography, you know it when you see it.

On getting a majority of pledged delegates:
actually, no one has secured a majority of the pledged delegates, but Obama will if he wins Oregon next Tuesday.

On Obama's perceived unelectability:
I had one uncommitted Superdelegate say to me, "we've painted ourselves into a corner by winnowing the field down to the two least electable Democrats who ran for president." The irony of your question is that up until the last few weeks, it was Clinton who was seen as having the November electability problems. Both have vulnerabilities that, say, an Evan Bayh or John Edwards might have been able to paper over. But the playing field is so tilted in the Dems favor that reportedly Bill Clinton has told folks a refrigerator could get elected against a candidate with an (R) next to his name.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 04:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC