Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

UH oh Clinton PLEDGED Delegate just switched to Obama

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:20 AM
Original message
UH oh Clinton PLEDGED Delegate just switched to Obama
Edited on Tue May-13-08 12:01 PM by Perky
Even as an Obama support this is troubling.

http://demconwatch.blogspot.com/2008/05/pledged-delegate-switches-to-obama.html

But then again Hillary said theat pledged delegates were fair game.

The question is was he poached?

If Clinton moves to replce him. Does she get criticized for hypocrisy.


If she lets him go does it start a cvil war for delegates and extend the race until Bloody Denver?

Does Obama say I don't want him?

Does he welcome him with open arms and start a cvil war for delegates and extend the race until Bloody Denver?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:21 AM
Response to Original message
1. Oh, snap.
Edited on Tue May-13-08 11:21 AM by Bornaginhooligan
Even the loyalists are jumping ship.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
2. Pledged Delegates exsist to support the view of the electorate as it percentaged out.
I Think this is legal but inappropriate and a dangerous precedent.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
helderheid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:25 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. ditto
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grantcart Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:34 AM
Response to Reply #2
10. It is ironic that the only one that does think it is ok is Hillary Clinton
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 02:23 PM
Response to Reply #2
20. kick
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 04:35 PM
Response to Reply #20
21. .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:24 AM
Response to Original message
3. It appears the Clinton campaign might not have fully vetted this delegate
"He had allowed his name to be listed as a supporter by the Obama campaign in December." At the very least his support for Clinton was somewhat weak.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
HiFructosePronSyrup Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:26 AM
Response to Reply #3
5. The Clinton campaign did something incompetently?
I'm shocked!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:35 AM
Response to Reply #3
11. Yeah the Clinton campaign really did not do their homework on this one.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AtomicKitten Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
6. Clinton gave her blessing to free agents when she declared she's not above poaching delegates.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
gcomeau Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
7. I'm not troubled by it at all.
When their OWN candidate declares, emphatically, that pledged delegates are allowed to change their minds as part of an attempt to try to reverse the course of the voting then I have to consider that expressly stated permission to her delegates to do exactly that if they feel the desire to.

If she hadn't tried to pull that one then this would make me uncomfortable, but as with most other misfortunes that have befallen her in this campaign she did this to herself and only has herself to blame.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
AllentownJake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:27 AM
Response to Original message
8. That's what happens
When you go for a name in an area instead of going for one of your loyal activist base as a delegate.

I think he should be forced to vote for Clinton however. Pledged Delegates are Pledged Delegates despiste what the Queen thinks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
4themind Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:29 AM
Response to Original message
9. About your question perky...
Edited on Tue May-13-08 11:33 AM by 4themind
"The question is was he poached?"We'll I haven't seen evidence for it, and I don't think it's in our interests (or the party's interest)to speculate about it unless we see any (yeah appeal to ignorance perhaps but still it's not a conclusion,just a method for forming an opinion untill the facts are known)Poaching (or even switching) does very grave harm to the primary system and the justification for millions of americans who voted, it's just not worth it, and obama can win without them, I have that confidence. I wish he'd go back to clinton actually, because this could be the ONLY argument that would give her justification to go to the convention, which WOULD (if recent history is any guide) fuck this thing up for democrats (those who don't want mccain that is). I think obama should just say thanks for your support but we don't encourage the switching of pledged delegates (when their candidate has not conceded)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:39 AM
Response to Reply #9
13. I agree with this nice strategic touch.
He does not need the lone delegate and it will trump Clinton's efforts to do the same at some point down the real. Makes hime look great and noble and her weasely if Ickes gets caught doing the same thing.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:38 AM
Response to Original message
12. Oh noes!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Occam Bandage Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:40 AM
Response to Original message
14. That ain't right. Pledged delegates are pledged.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democrattotheend Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:41 AM
Response to Original message
15. If it's one delegate, I'm not too concerned
It sounds like this delegate decided on his own to switch. I think he's wrong to do that if he was elected as a Clinton supporter, but I guess he has the right to do that. If this starts happening with a lot of delegates it could be evidence of poaching. But it's believable that one delegate could decide to switch of his own volition, or be a stealth Obama supporter all along who slipped under the radar.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
charlie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:44 AM
Response to Original message
16. Satisfying as it might be
this guy really needs to be taken aside and learned a thing or two. I hope he gets an earful from the people who entrusted him with their votes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Lady-Damai Donating Member (756 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 11:45 AM
Response to Reply #16
17. I agree. Not cool. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Perky Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 12:00 PM
Response to Original message
18. SO HOW DOES THIS PLAY OUT?
If Clinton moves to replce him. Does she get criticized for hypocrisy.


If she lets him go does it start a cvil war for delegates and extend the race until Bloody Denver?

Does Obama say I don't want him?

Does he welcome him with open arms and start a cvil war for delegates and extend the race until Bloody Denver?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mohc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 12:04 PM
Response to Reply #18
19. I don't think she can replace him at this point
From the Maryland Delegate Selection rules:

The State Chair shall convey to the presidential candidate, or that candidate’s
authorized representative(s), no later than April 21, 2008, a list of all persons who
have filed pledged to that presidential candidate. Each presidential candidate, or
his authorized representative(s), must then file with the State Chair by 5:00 p.m.
on April 26, 2008 a list of all such candidates he or she has approved, provided
that approval is given to at least three times the number of candidates for delegate
and alternate slots to be selected. Failure to respond will be deemed approval of
all delegate and alternate candidates submitted to the presidential candidate, or
the authorized representative(s), unless signified otherwise in writing to the State
Chair no later than April 26, 2008.


The candidate's right of review ends a specific date depending on the state, for Maryland that day has passed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
reflection Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 04:41 PM
Response to Original message
22. This is not kosher. Obama should reject this guy. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Egnever Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue May-13-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
23. Ugh as much as i like it,,,,,Convention floor fight here we come.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Thu May 02nd 2024, 08:47 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC