Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Why don't more people mention the fact that when Clinton talks about the popular vote, she isn't

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:12 PM
Original message
Why don't more people mention the fact that when Clinton talks about the popular vote, she isn't
she isn't counting caucus states. It drives me nuts on all of these programs that nobody ever brings this up when Hillary, Terry, etc... talk about catching up in the popular vote. They make a big fuss about counting the states that broke the rules, but conveniently don't count many more states.

Whenever I tell people that that the "popular vote" (or as Terry said it on MTP...."more people will have voted for Clinton") doesn't include caucuses they are shocked. I don't think your average person realizes this.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
NC_Nurse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:13 PM
Response to Original message
1. Yep. I had no idea about that until I heard it here. Definitely a big deal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:15 PM
Response to Reply #1
2. Not many people do
I have many friends and family that are very "into" politics and it always is a surprise when I tell them this.

I wish Obama surrogates would bring this up
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:21 PM
Response to Reply #1
3. Perhaps we should write the media with this?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MikeDJohn Donating Member (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:24 PM
Response to Original message
4. This is JUST TYPICAL Clinton McAsshat lying! Another reason why
She's a poor candidate, she's not even CANDID with the voters!


We've seen it over Bosnia, we've seen it over how they play with the numbers......ignore all the caucuses, etc.


Terry McAsshat has run his last campaign, and better find himself a day job, if anyone will believe his resume.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:30 PM
Response to Original message
5. Is it her fault
that you don't understand Clinton math? Caucus states don't count, durr (unless she won them). No caucuses in the GE. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:33 PM
Response to Reply #5
6. It just blows my mind that the press never mentions this
This popular vote line is repeated over and over and nobody ever mentions this fact (most people presume it counts all the states)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:47 PM
Response to Reply #6
9. I think they are pretty much..
in the "why bother" mode. I mean it'll just change again, and it will change nothing. The SD's who are putting him over the top know the score. She might be tricking some of her supporters, but she's not fooling them.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:51 PM
Response to Reply #9
10. I think you're right
It just drives me bananas when I listen to Terry on MTP tell Tim Russert that at the end of this more people will have voted for her (which will likely not be the case anyway) and he doesn't say, but your not counting the voters from Iowa, Nevada, etc...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 02:10 PM
Response to Reply #10
12. It used to frustrate me too,
but then I realize that Obama's won, and they've become irrelevant, so everyone is doing nothing more than amusing them. Even Terry knows his spinning is ridiculous that's why he laughs so much, and talks so fast while he's doing it, but he will continue to do it until Hillary decides it's time to exit. Now it's no longer frustrating, just funny. Instead of having the urge to throw something at my t.v., I literally just laugh at them making asses of themselves. One good thing about it, we'll have our own spinners in the GE I guess against the Republican spinners. :P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 02:15 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. I need to take a deep breath
and follow your lead!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 02:37 PM
Response to Reply #13
14. Yeah, just look at those
beautiful numbers. He's added like 5 more SD's today alone. He's winning in EVERY measure. There is nothing short of an Obama implosion that can turn this around now. No amount of WV/KY spin. No amount of electability spin. No amount of white vote spin. They're pretty much left with nothing to argue so they're left with that one little straw of hope. But the very people they need to convince with that, aren't buying it as their constant move towards Obama illustrates.

Even the whole FL/MI debacle is just spin, because even when they seat those, it won't help her win, he will still be ahead in every measure, even the popular vote. That's why they haven't accepted any sort of deal though fair ones are being offered. If she accepts the deal she's forced to give up that false argument. I really think the only reason she's still in is that she is getting bad advice from those working for her, and working furiously to find something, anything to sink Obama. Or, she just wants to go out on a high note, after wins in WV & KY.

I just try to remember all the frustration over Wright, and the constant playing of that the weekend before Indiana and NC, and at the end of the day, he lost Indiana by less than 1% even though you won't hear them admit THAT either. And nothing they can say was worse than the Rev.Wright knee-capping. So have a laugh at Terry, chuckling as he spins, and enjoy the WTF looks on the faces of the people hosting his spinfest, especially when he tells Tim his dad is looking down from heaven, even though his dad apparently isn't dead. Desperation often makes people exhibit bizarre behavior. Ahhhhh, Terry, you're a riot.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
julialnyc Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 03:15 PM
Response to Reply #14
15. Thank you!
You have just made me feel much better!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
graycem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 03:37 PM
Response to Reply #15
17. Glad I did! :)
Just a few weeks to go. :party:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SoonerPride Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:35 PM
Response to Original message
7. You forget, caucus states don't count
I thought we'd been over that already.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
electron_blue Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:36 PM
Response to Original message
8. Ya mean she's leaving out Minnesotans?
Link? I have been wondering whether this was even true about su pposedly catching the pop vote. Seems awfully unlikely.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
CakeGrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 01:52 PM
Response to Original message
11. I've posted this on another thread where they linked to a CNN poll
That has a large majority of responses saying that the popular vote should count more than delegates.

That just proves that:

1) People don't understand the purpose of the delegate apportionment system or how it works;

2) The MSM continues to prop up Hillary Clinton, refusing to debunk the last option she has.

I agree that the Obama camp needs to explain why this claim for MI and FL would not be valid...if they can get the airtime to do it.

But then...what possible reason would remain for Hillary to stay in the race?

:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rinsd Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon May-12-08 03:17 PM
Response to Original message
16. She likely is including the caucus states. Her problem is including MI.
Edited on Mon May-12-08 03:18 PM by rinsd
Only 4 caucus states didn't release pop vote figures(IA, ME, WA, NV and RCP has estimated a 110,000 voter advantage for Obama in those 4 states.

But Obama was not on the ballot in MI, so I don't think you can use the pop vote total from MI.

Here are the various pop vote scenarios.

State		       Obama	            Clinton	               Spread
Popular Vote Total 16,003,521 49.5% 15,266,942 47.3% Obama +736,579 +2.2%

Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 16,337,605 49.6% 15,490,804 47.0% Obama +846,801 +2.6%

Popular Vote (w/FL) 16,579,735 48.7% 16,137,928 47.4% Obama +441,807 +1.3%

Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 16,913,819 48.7% 16,361,790 47.1% Obama +552,029 +1.6%

Popular Vote (w/FL & MI)** 16,579,735 47.9% 16,466,237 47.5% Obama +113,498 +0.33%

Estimate w/IA, NV, ME, WA* 16,913,819 47.9% 16,690,099 47.3% Obama +223,720 +0.64%


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sat May 04th 2024, 12:29 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC