|
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend Bookmark this thread |
This topic is archived. |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
goletian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:22 AM Original message |
Obama unelectable? No. Hillary is unelectable -- SHE IS LOSING. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
cliffordu (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:24 AM Response to Original message |
1. Yep, she is unelectable......happily so. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:25 AM Response to Reply #1 |
2. Several national surveys say otherwise. Bloomberg's gives her... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
40ozDonkey (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:29 AM Response to Reply #2 |
6. Then she should've won the primary, as the same surveys said in '07. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:30 AM Response to Reply #6 |
8. We're talking about how she'd do in a GE. They both beat McCain. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
40ozDonkey (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:37 AM Response to Reply #8 |
16. I'm saying an electability issue can't be made off a survey. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #6 |
30. McGovern, Humphrey, Carter, Gore, Kerry, Dukakis... shall I go on? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
40ozDonkey (730 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 08:09 PM Response to Reply #30 |
33. Sure, go on with your red herring roll call. n/t |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeDJohn (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:30 AM Response to Reply #2 |
7. So if you would have YOUR way... HIllary wins the Nomination of the |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Captain Hilts (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #7 |
10. We're talking past each other. You don't get my point. nt |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hill_win_2008 (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:33 AM Response to Reply #7 |
12. You missed the point |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeDJohn (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 12:51 PM Response to Reply #12 |
28. I didn't miss any point! I know Hillary was ahead in the polls .... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goletian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:42 AM Response to Reply #7 |
19. too bad all those people supporting her in the polls dont seem to show up to cast their votes... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:27 AM Response to Original message |
3. So you believe |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
bowens43 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:28 AM Response to Reply #3 |
4. to argue that the loser is the better candidate is just stupid. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:32 AM Response to Reply #4 |
11. That's not the question, is it? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goletian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:35 AM Response to Reply #11 |
15. uh, no. thats not the entirety of my post. your attempt at spin isnt surprising though. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeDJohn (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:38 AM Response to Reply #11 |
18. How's this premise for defying logic? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 12:50 PM Response to Reply #18 |
26. But I'm not arguing that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Texas Hill Country (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 12:53 PM Response to Reply #4 |
32. the winner of the primary is not always the best GE candidate... esp for the Dems. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
hill_win_2008 (146 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:29 AM Response to Reply #3 |
5. Agreed |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Youphemism (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:31 AM Response to Reply #3 |
9. Exactly |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:34 AM Response to Reply #9 |
14. Of course |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goletian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:38 AM Response to Reply #14 |
17. hypothetically? philosophically? theoretically? shoulda woulda coulda? |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeDJohn (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:43 AM Response to Reply #17 |
20. Hillary had 7.5 years to prepare for this race. Whereas Obama, not so |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 12:52 PM Response to Reply #20 |
29. Well there are plenty of threads to discuss that |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MonkeyFunk (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 12:51 PM Response to Reply #17 |
27. Except I'm not making any such argument |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:34 AM Response to Original message |
13. Well, it is belaboring the issue at this point but... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeDJohn (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:48 AM Response to Reply #13 |
22. The time to look at how the primaries/caucuses were put together was.... |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
Deep13 (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:53 AM Response to Reply #22 |
24. As I said, it doesn't matter now. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
MikeDJohn (122 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 12:02 PM Response to Reply #24 |
25. I'm not referring to FL and MIch...but if you want all of those folks included |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
goletian (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:46 AM Response to Original message |
21. What's funny is, a lot of conservatives argue on Hillary's behalf, saying shes more electable than |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
TexasObserver (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 11:49 AM Response to Original message |
23. She can't win 15 states, and that's the fact. |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
lastliberalintexas (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore | Mon May-12-08 12:53 PM Response to Original message |
31. Either would have a great chance in Nov |
Printer Friendly | Permalink | | Top |
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) | Sat May 04th 2024, 05:48 AM Response to Original message |
Advertisements [?] |
Top |
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) |
Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators
Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.
Home | Discussion Forums | Journals | Store | Donate
About DU | Contact Us | Privacy Policy
Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.
© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC