|
Edited on Sat Jul-31-04 03:25 PM by elperromagico
The four presidents in the last 40 years who have won reelection - LBJ, Nixon, Reagan, and Clinton - never trailed their opponents in polling IIRC, so any bounce they received from their conventions probably didn't have any real effect on the election other than to solidify their support.
You would have to go all the way back to Truman in 1948 to find an incumbent president who was trailing his opponent and was helped to victory by a strong convention speech (and a vigorous campaign). But George W. Bush is not Harry Truman. He lacks both the guts and the integrity for that. And Truman had a Congress, controlled by the opposition, that he could blame for a lot of the nation's troubles. Bush doesn't have that either.
So what about the incumbents who lost? What about Ford, Carter, and Bush 41? What kind of bounces did they get from their conventions? Clearly the bounces weren't enough to reelect them. But what can we expect from the historical precedents their campaigns provide?
|