Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

*BREAKING* New SUSA poll Oregon....Obama 50, Clinton 44

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Secret_Society Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:42 PM
Original message
*BREAKING* New SUSA poll Oregon....Obama 50, Clinton 44
Edited on Fri May-02-08 06:42 PM by Secret_Society
I believe this is good news for HRC. In a state with a very small black population, I believe Hillary has a strong chance to move these numbers. As I see it HRC will end this primary season very strong (winning RI, Ohio, Texas, Pennsylvania, Indiana, Kentucky, WV, Oregon, and PR with Obama only closing out with Vermont, NC, Montana, and SD, Oregon up for grabs). This was a state that many believed Obama would easily. He may have to come out and debate in Oregon with a race this close. Of course it's only one poll and what the hell do I know.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
LakeSamish706 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
1. Dreams, Dreams, and more Dreams... n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Pawel K Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:47 PM
Response to Reply #1
5. lol, now you have that song stuck in my head. thanks
Edited on Fri May-02-08 06:48 PM by Pawel K
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:43 PM
Response to Original message
2. I think that's very similar to other polls that have come out of Oregon
Edited on Fri May-02-08 06:44 PM by Cali_Democrat
Is it not? I don't remember all that well.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:48 PM
Response to Reply #2
6. No. There have been only 2 OR polls since January and both were down by this firm
4/6 Obama 52, Hillary 42
Now Obama 50, Hillary 44

Obama down 2, Hillary up 2 and this is before she gets shots of momentum from IN and WV.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #6
15. So Obama's been through one of the biggest, longest shitstorms of any candidate in recent memory...
And she gains a measly four points. Wow.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Cali_Democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:57 PM
Response to Reply #6
21. Considering the media onslaught...
that's not too shabby for Obama. It's been Wright 24/7/365. Only down 2 and Hillary up two. His support remained above 50%. Not bad at all!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
3. In a state with a very small black population......
I dont know why, but that sounds offensive to me coming from another Democrat.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #3
7. It also belies a fundamental misunderstanding of Oregon politics
Obama should win the state handily and if I were to posit a guess, I'd say a 6 point spread would be about right.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
smalll Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:44 PM
Response to Reply #7
44. Yes it does. Oregon's Dem primary electorate has to rival Vermont's for extreme latte liberalism.
You've got Portland (Seattle South) only lightly seasoned by a few votes out in the hinterlands.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
depakid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 04:36 PM
Response to Reply #44
68. Wow.
Yet another who apparently doesn't understand us.

Seattle South?

Perish the thought....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
10. it was offensive.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #10
35. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Secret_Society Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #3
11. I was just pointing to the fact that blacks are firmly behind Obama now
No matter how long Clinton campaigned in NC, should would not be able to move 35% of the electorate. No offense meant.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:55 PM
Response to Reply #11
18. The implication the white Obama supporters are somehow less
committed or less firm than black Obama supporters is sort of a slap in the face to white Obama supporters, don't you think?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Secret_Society Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:01 PM
Response to Reply #18
23. Of course not...each side has very commited supporters
I am just discussing demographics. Oregon, demographically, has less people that cannot be moved from Obama's camp. Oregon is also younger than PA, thus, demographically, Obama also has more a people he can move. I wanted to point out that though many assumed Oregon to be an Obama state, it may not be the cause and the numbers may be plastic.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:12 PM
Response to Reply #23
27. That's too reductive.
By that analysis Clinton had a good chance in Vermont b/c there are a lot of whites there; the reality is she had absolutely no chance in Vermont.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:38 AM
Response to Reply #27
63. That takes us back to Iowa. Virtually a "white" state....and who won there?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Blondiegrrl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:35 PM
Response to Reply #18
41. Hell, the implication that Obama's white supporters are all wealthy is an insult to ME.
dirt poor <--------------
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:47 PM
Response to Reply #11
53. yeah right...
I'm so sick of that crap! I'm an American, and I support Barack Obama!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
khaliljohnson Donating Member (15 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #3
31. You are trying to play the race card
Edited on Fri May-02-08 08:25 PM by khaliljohnson
the poster said what he said that because Obama typically wins states with very small black population by large margins. It's then a good news that Obama's lead in this state--which has a small black population, is not big.

Obama supporters always want to make everything about race. They beg the gods for a race war. They want everyone to think that the Clintons are racist.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:45 PM
Response to Reply #31
45. No, that's not what he was saying.
He was saying that because the electorate is white, they're more malleable.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wanpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:24 PM
Response to Reply #31
55. no one has to want the Clintons to be considered racists, one only need to look at the tactics used
by their campaign that have now firmly made race a pivotal issue in this race. Obama tried to rise above divisiveness and wedge politics. When the chips were down, the Clintons resorted to this type of politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
QC Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:31 PM
Response to Reply #3
57. Oregon's population is 1.9% African-American.
Most would consider that a fairly small share of any state's population.

http://quickfacts.census.gov/qfd/states/41000.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:47 PM
Response to Original message
4. He may not even win MT and SD
Edited on Fri May-02-08 06:51 PM by jackson_dem
The reason they are expected to go for him in a landslide is the same reason OR was: caucuses in neighboring states. OR, SD, and MT will all have primaries that allow equal access to voting and do not disenfranchise working folks, seniors, immigrants, and others. He won the Washington caucus (10% turnout) 68-31. However, in the primary which had more than double the turnout his margin was only 51-46 and this was during the height of his popularity during the halcyon "11 straight" days. There is no polling for Montana but the lone SD poll had him ahead by 12 several weeks ago. For sure he begins with an advantage in OR, SD, and MT but they are not locks for him by any means like they would be if they were 1.9% turnout caucuses or like NC is.

Obama won't debate. He knows he sucks at them and knows what happens to his numbers after debates. A debate alone could swing that 6 point lead to a narrow deficit.

This is one poll but we only have had two OR polls and by the same firm. This shows movement to Clinton. He led by 10 before. She will have momentum heading into OR after winning IN, almost pulling off a miracle in NC, and blowing him out in WV the week before Oregon and Kentucky vote. She has a shot at sweeping the rest of the contests aside from NC.

One more not about OR, while it has a small black population it has a large "latte liberal" population and that is why, along with mistakenly conflating sham caucus results in nearby states, he was expected to win OR easily. If he can't win Oregon where can he win (since the vetting process began) a primary where the black share of the electorate is under 1/3?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:49 PM
Response to Reply #4
8. She needs 66%+ in every contest. Can she close the deal?
:popcorn:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:51 PM
Response to Reply #8
12. She just needs to win the popular vote, and that is entirely possible. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jefferson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #12
19. What does the popular vote have to do with anything?
Edited on Fri May-02-08 06:58 PM by jefferson_dem
You might as well say "all Hillary needs is the sound of one hand clapping."

It takes 2025 delegate votes - or a lead in PDs - to secure the nomination, silly.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:59 PM
Response to Reply #19
22. Nowhere in the nomination rules does it say anything about being entitlted to the nomination...
If you have a plurality of pledged delegates.

You clinch the nomination by winning 2024 pledged delegates. That's it.

Neither candidate will win 2024 pledged delegates, so we use other metrics to determine who the nominee is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
36. Hello? Is there echo in your brain?
POPULAR VOTES DOES NOT COUNT IN THIS PRIMARY - DELEGATES DOES!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NJSecularist Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:33 PM
Response to Reply #36
40. Neither candidate will have 2024 pledged delegates. So your point is moot. n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
jackson_dem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:52 PM
Response to Reply #8
13. Only if you believe the fairy tale that superdelegates, FL/MI don't exist
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wanpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:26 PM
Response to Reply #13
56. FL/MI didn't follow the rules. You can't disobey the rules and then change them when you don't like
the way the game is shaping up.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:56 PM
Response to Reply #4
20. I like my coffee like I like my candidate...
Black, strong and bitter! :7

So you can take your latte liberal comment and suck on it! Oregon is Obama territory, baby!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
neverforget Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:34 PM
Response to Reply #4
58. what the fuck is a "latte liberal"? Please tell this Oregonian what that is.
Thanks.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
woolldog Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:49 PM
Response to Original message
9. She's not going to win Oregon.
Sorry. Don't get your hopes up. You think she has a strong chance to move those numbers just because there are a lot of white people in Oregon? Wow.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
LSparkle Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:52 PM
Response to Original message
14. Yeah, what the hell do you know ...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Secret_Society Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:54 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Not much just like everybody else here looking to make predictions
just looking to have a nice discussion
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 06:54 PM
Response to Original message
16. I'm seeing far more Obama signs than Clinton here in Oregon.
Like 10:1. The energy's on Obama's side.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rosa Luxemburg Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #16
25. Obama should win Oregon
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Oregone Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:22 PM
Response to Reply #16
28. Ive seen ZERO Clinton signs
Quite a few Obama signs (about the same amount as Ron Paul signs).
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Qutzupalotl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:41 PM
Response to Reply #28
52. I saw my first Clinton yard sign a week ago,
surrounded by two Obama signs. They stand out for their rarity.

A month or two back I saw a Clinton bumpersticker on a minivan.

But I see Obama everywhere.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sakura Donating Member (660 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:15 AM
Response to Reply #16
61. I haven't seen a single Clinton sign...
And I drive all over the Portland metro area for work. One Clinton bumper sticker so far. Countless Obama signs and stickers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rove karl rove Donating Member (298 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:03 PM
Response to Original message
24. she is closing the gap but
Obama ought to be able to still win - the local media here is full of his ads, haven't seen nary a Clinton one YET, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Secret_Society Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 07:05 PM
Response to Reply #24
26. I'm sure money wise she's taking it one state at a time
I do know Bill was in eastern Oregon already
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:42 AM
Response to Reply #26
64. Where was he? What town?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
thewiseguy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
29. Obama is up and you are spinning it in favor of Hillary?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
KittyWampus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
30. She already LOST TEXAS.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
truth-warrior Donating Member (61 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:24 PM
Response to Original message
32. Obama is fading FAST
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hawkeye-X Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
33. Hillary is not even going to make it to Oregon
Not with her $30M in debt, and barely $15M in fundraising - per my prediction thread.

Hawkeye-X
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
StevieM Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:25 PM
Response to Original message
34. I wouldn't count on an Obama win in Montana. Maybe Daschle can carry him piggy back
to victory in South Dakota.

Steve
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Skwmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
37. So now Oregon is home to a bunch of WHITE RACISTS?
Edited on Fri May-02-08 08:28 PM by Skwmom
I wonder how the residents of Oregon would feel about being painted as a bunch of white racists?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:49 PM
Response to Reply #37
46. Well, this one
Says I know at least one assjacked town that is chock full up of racists. And when I went there last week, I saw 7 Hillary signs in the space of 9 houses. Parents of the kids I went to High School with.

Outside of that, it is a bit annoying. The rest of us, the bulk of us even, are relatively free of it, aside from the normal built in systematic racism present across our country.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Roxy66 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:44 AM
Response to Reply #46
65. Name of the town?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 02:23 AM
Response to Reply #65
66. Heh
Sandy. Just east of Portland. Not my favorite place.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nancyr Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:22 PM
Response to Reply #37
47. We already know it.
The rural areas outside of the major metropolitan centers are pretty darned bigoted. Thank God for Portland and Eugene!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Major Hogwash Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:28 PM
Response to Original message
38. Hillary doesn't have a prayer in Oregon.
Believe me, not even a faint prayer.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bensthename Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
39. Obama is leading in a state with a "very small black population".
MSM has me believing only the black states will and have voted for him..
What is going on here? Does MSM know about this? Oh gawd..
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Hoof Hearted Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:38 PM
Response to Original message
42. Holy shit! This is ENORMOUSLY good news for Hillary!
Woooooo! Hooooooo!:toast:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
quakerboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 08:41 PM
Response to Original message
43. Um... the problem is
a lot of us are voting Right now, not later. My ballot arrived in the mail Today and will be filled out before sundown. I just have to figure out the local candidates. So, will future polls really have any meaning? Would a swing in the polls on the 15th make any difference in the Oregon result? I have doubts.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
avrdream Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:23 PM
Response to Original message
48. Yeah, just about every recent poll is showing upward movement for Hill!
Just wait until Rev. Wright answers back to Barack in a few days!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goldcanyonaz Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:24 PM
Response to Original message
49. SWEET!!!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Joe the Revelator Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:30 PM
Response to Original message
50. The last poll had Obama by ten, right? This looks like statistical noise to me.
Edited on Fri May-02-08 09:30 PM by Wolsh
Hate to burst your pipe dream.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
sandnsea Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 09:33 PM
Response to Original message
51. lolololol, they must have called the retirement towns
There is no way these numbers are right. This is hysterical.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
wanpete Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:19 PM
Response to Original message
54. in a state with a very small black population....guess that's the only way Obama wins huh?
this seems to be a very narrow-minded way of thinking. He has broad appeal.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 10:37 PM
Response to Original message
59. wow... selective details...
you mentioned RI OH TX for Hillary but forgot to mention WY and MS for Obama.... andI think he will win PR.... he has the institutional support... I have yet to hear any arguments as to why Hillary would win. Her position on PR statehood will be a big deal breaker for her in PR.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Secret_Society Donating Member (466 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 12:45 AM
Response to Reply #59
60. I didn't include WY and MS because I was counting froom March 4th
I have heard pundits mention her support there. Also, the one poll that has been conducted had her up 13%. What is her position on PR statehood?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
mckeown1128 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 04:32 PM
Response to Reply #60
67. WY and MS were AFTER march 4th....
and the pundits... please don't think the pundits know ANY thing. They are full of it. They think that because PR have similar skin tone to South western Hispanic Americans that they will vote like them. They don't seperate skin tone from cultures. PR's have different issues at stake and Obama is on the right side of issues important to them.


Also, polls don't mean anything untill the candidates get on the ground. Most states had Hillary way up untill Obama introduced himself to the voters... Look I am not saying Obama is going to win. I am saying we really don't have any clue as to how they will vote.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
davidpdx Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 01:26 AM
Response to Original message
62. The last poll had Obama up by 8
Edited on Sat May-03-08 01:26 AM by davidpdx
Not much movement and it might be just the ebb and flow of the race as polls go up and down.

Being from Oregon, I know Obama has quite a bit of support. It has nothing to do with the population of African-Americans and more to do with the individual candidate's stances on the issues. A very large portion of the population is based in the Willamette Valley, Portland, Salem and Eugene.

If I were a Clinton supporter (and I'm not) I wouldn't count on Oregon going for her. Just being honest.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MattP Donating Member (525 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Sat May-03-08 04:43 PM
Response to Original message
69. Oregon is a no-go for Clinton
Obama is going to obliterate her in Oregon, big time. It's not even going to be close.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 03:34 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC