Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

This Kantor stuff: Sometimes the charges are so ludicrous they don't merit a response.

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:33 PM
Original message
This Kantor stuff: Sometimes the charges are so ludicrous they don't merit a response.
I've been sitting here trying to think of a reasoned response to the ludicrous Kantor charges that are dominating DU's GDP front page today...

But those charges are so stupid, they just don't merit a response.

It's obvious that the Obama supporters who are trying to somehow smear Hillary Clinton by using a doctored clip from sixteen years ago are nothing short of desperate for anything they can find to trump the Obama/Wright drama.

How do you answer charges that are so stupid? How do you respond to the very same people who yesterday spun half a quotation to wound Hillary? (Didn't work, but was funny to watch.)

The honest-to-god truth is that there are some people at DU who have zero ethics, who don't mind outright LYING about their opponent, if they think that it'll somehow help the candidate they support.

To those Obama supporters who have spoken against what happened yesterday and today, I commend you. I'm recommending your threads, even if they're unrelated to these scandals, because you demonstrate a quality we should all exhibit--integrity.

Two days. Two contrived charges against Hillary Clinton. Some of you have no ethical grounding.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
DJ13 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:36 PM
Response to Original message
1. Coming from someone who was enjoying the Wright issue, this is a joke
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:38 PM
Response to Reply #1
4. they do not even remotely understand the concepts of hypocrisy or irony...
it's funny...
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:20 PM
Response to Reply #4
12. I'd accept your criticism if there were any basis to it.
But you lump all Hillary supporters together and then criticize them as a group.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dionysus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:26 PM
Response to Reply #12
13. no, they're not all shillbots like you...
:shrug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:30 PM
Response to Reply #1
15. big difference
the Wright videos were real. He said those things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Fermezlabush Donating Member (211 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:37 PM
Response to Original message
2. I've seen Hillary blamed for it too...
:wtf:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
PBS Poll-435 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
3. I agree.
This filth really puts a few people in an entirely new light.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:38 PM
Response to Original message
5. ...and yet you make a response anyway.

Coming from someone who gladly pushed the manufactured scandal that was Rev Wright, you lose in your attempt to claim the "high ground".


Yesterday's scandal... I'm assuming you're talking about WVWV... was not manufactured in the least. A group supporting Clinton was engaging in misleading robo-calls. That's an incontrovertible fact.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #5
20. .
Indeed.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
grassfed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
6. it was revealing to see scranton gal unleash her wolves on Youtube, ABC, Huffpost...
tough pro-war/torture/cluster bombs/landmines/racist colonialism broad




Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
NatBurner Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:42 PM
Response to Original message
7. lol
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Mezzo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:44 PM
Response to Original message
8. k & r nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 02:56 PM
Response to Original message
9. But you will go ahead and respond anyway . . .
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
kdpeters Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:04 PM
Response to Original message
10. This from the all McClurkin all the time poster
With no hint of irony whatsoever.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:17 PM
Response to Reply #10
11. You've mistaken me for someone else.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Beausoir Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:29 PM
Response to Original message
14. They all know the video is fake but they still proudly smear a good Democrat.
It's astonishing.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:31 PM
Response to Reply #14
17. Clinton is not a good Democrat
Machine Democrat perhaps. Yet not a good one in my view.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:33 PM
Response to Reply #14
19. The "sh**" part is *NOT* fake.... the N-word part is......
....and it's no big deal at all.


In 1992... the Indiana people WERE shit for voting for Bush/Quayle.



Really... who cares what Mickey Kantor said 16 years ago? (just like, who cares what Jeremia Wright said many years ago?)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zachstar Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:31 PM
Response to Original message
16. All I see is a bunch of Clinton supporters running damage control.
Last time I saw it this bad was Snipergate.

I have asked everyone to go look at the DVD and any other evidence they can find. I suggest you do the same. Because if this turns out to be in any way true you are going to look REALLY bad!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Barack_America Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:33 PM
Response to Original message
18. So you start a new thread on it?
What's the point?

And what was yesterday's "contrived charge"?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Maddy McCall Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:34 PM
Response to Reply #18
21. The point is that I'm not going to waste my time responding to the oodles of threads...
by dumbasses who are lying.

It's that simple.

And I invite others with integrity to ignore those threads, too.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:06 PM
Response to Reply #21
27. I wish you had this same moral fortitude when you were claiming Obama gave Hillary the finger...
....
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Rhythm Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:36 PM
Response to Original message
22. And after all the Wright-related POUTRAGE on their side
The constant whining about how it's a "non-issue", blah blah blah. And yet, see how fast they jump on something as stupid as this.

The hypocrisy around here is just unfuckingbelievable. The sickest part is that all of the idiots spouting this crap KNOW that they're being hypocritical--but they don't give a damn. Doesn't matter if it's sixteen years old, doesn't matter if it's relevant to her ability to govern the country or not, doesn't even matter if it's even TRUE or not. If it might hurt her, the sadistic Clinton-haters around here are ready to scream fake outrage at the top of their lungs.

Whatever credibility these morons had regarding their precious "principles" when claiming that they wouldn't vote for Hillary if she wins the nomination just got flushed down the toilet. They HAVE no principles--none. Zero. They traded their principles for brainless Freeper fanaticism.

"Deal with it." "Get over it." "We won, you lost, tough shit." I heard this shit for fucking YEARS from the right wing, and I am sick and tired of hearing it from the self-proclaimed "Democrats" around here. Every time someone mouths off with one of those smug, gloating, bullshit lines I just want to scream, "Does it make you feel like a Big Fucking Person to treat other people like shit? Does acting like a fucking Freeper get your rocks off?" Talk about some psychotically misplaced anger issues.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madrchsod Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 03:49 PM
Response to Original message
23. i fell for it hook ,line ,and sinker....
ever since i read this earlier this morning i`ve been wondering most of the day if this was real...the first video posted was faked and i have`t watched the other video because it`s really a nonissue...well maybe not.

who doctored the video and why? that is what i would like to really know. i mean real proof not fiction.

the other thing that really concerns me is that gramps was in iowa dissing farm subsidies and the democrats are cutting each others throats.
gramps get zero news coverage on what should have been hillary and baracks issue to attack gramps on...there`s a lot of farmers in indiana and north carolina.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
lastliberalintexas Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:10 PM
Response to Reply #23
28. I think that's the only reason it's important
"who doctored the video and why? that is what i would like to really know. i mean real proof not fiction."

And though I don't have any proof, I would bet good money that it was the republican machine. Just as I think the republican machine manufactured the Wright controversy.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzybeans Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:00 PM
Response to Original message
24. I beg to differ. You deserve credit for turning me around that's for sure. This is for you.
Edited on Fri May-02-08 04:32 PM by izzybeans
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
yourguide Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:03 PM
Response to Original message
25. Dear God, you and I havent talked for a long time...
(insert a bunch of gratuitous nonsense about my breasts, blah blah blah, me me me)


And God, thank you for Michael Kantor, he's a good man.


Perhaps we should talk more often.


Love,

Me

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
scheming daemons Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Fri May-02-08 04:05 PM
Response to Original message
26. The OP is from someone who made post after post about "finger-gate" a week and a half ago...
:eyes:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Sun May 05th 2024, 09:56 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC