Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

Cheney uses the fact that the Democrats have two Candidates who.....

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 04:22 AM
Original message
Cheney uses the fact that the Democrats have two Candidates who.....
supported the Iraq War to paint the "Dumb and Dumber" Movie Scenario that some people here at DU warned about weeks ago. Except, instead of using the word Dumb he says it's a medical condition, i.e....."Amnesia".

"Sens. John Kerry and John Edwards, the presumed Democratic presidential ticket, reviewed the same reports on Iraq that were given to President Bush and supported the decision to go to war, Cheney said."

"Now it seems they've both developed a convenient case of campaign amnesia,"


http://www.cnn.com/2004/ALLPOLITICS/07/12/cheney.dems.ap/index.html
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 04:38 AM
Response to Original message
1. Nice try, Cheney
Making a decision based on flawed intelligence is one thing.


What Kerry did, ( from the 60 Minutes Interview ), was vote to enable the president to take necessary action - but this is not saying that he favored the invasion and occupation.

But where are the WMDs?
What is our exit strategy?
What have we gained from this?
What NEW proof is there of a connection between Iraq and Al Quieda?

He is still part of the impetus behind invading Iraq under false pretenses and then lying to the American people about it.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
izzie Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 04:51 AM
Response to Reply #1
2. I did not understand it was to just go to war either.
I thought it was to go to the UN etc and find out if there was any reason to go to war. WH just used the vote to take off. If Bush, is saying we should have got rid of this man, Saddam, why wasn't North Korea a better place to go? We know they have bombs now.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
amber dog democrat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 05:00 AM
Response to Reply #2
3. This sums up how evil they are.
Evil beyond words.
Lies, its all based on lies.
Everything coming out of this administration is based on lies.
They don't have a shred of integrety - and this Administration maims and kills with impunity.

The reality behind this war is so outrageous that most people are not going to believe it. Kerry never supported going directly to the invasion / attack.
AFter the House and Senate gave the Chimp Administration a blank check to do what it pleased, there was no stopping them.

When the record is more complex and sublte, lies are easier to proclaim and believe. Most people like simple causes and effects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
rfranklin Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 05:01 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Bush promised Congress and the American people that...
he would give the weapons inspectors time to do their job. He lied. Bush promised that he would go back to the U.N. before he invaded Iraq. He lied. Cheney claimed there was a provable working relationship between Iraq and Al Qaeda. He lied. Et cetera, et cetera, et cetera.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
TexasProgresive Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 06:01 AM
Response to Reply #4
5. Saddam didn't let the inspectors in, Remember.
That's what our highly intellegent box of rocks, Du(m)bya said at least twice.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratreformed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #4
14. Again, to me, the main issue
is that Congress and the Senate voted to NOT have the power to force him to come back to them before actually sending troops. They gave up their right and responsibility.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
democratreformed Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 08:09 AM
Response to Reply #2
12. I understood it.
I understood that Congress and the Senate voted to give up their power to vote before our nation went to war. I understood that we would inevitably end up exactly where we are at.

My Congressman understood it. He voted NO.

I'm just not buying the "That's not what they voted for" meme. If other voters do, then that'll be great.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Leilani Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 09:48 AM
Response to Reply #12
15. Agreed...I also understood.
How come Bob Graham knew enough to vote against the war? Bob Byrd?

Heck, Linc Chafee, a Republican, said he looked at all the intelligence, & it did not add up to a credible threat. If he knew, why not the others?

Face it: it was politically expedient to vote for the war.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 06:12 AM
Response to Original message
6. Cheney still insists their were ties between Osama and Saddam
So let me see, now I should believe that Kerry/Edwards are Dumb and Dumber?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
deminflorida Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 06:24 AM
Response to Reply #6
7. Your not supposed to believe anything Cheney says, I don't, but this is
how the GOP will attempt to paint Kerry/Edwards. I plays right along with their Flip-Flop strategy they used so effectively against Gore in 2000.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
emulatorloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 06:53 AM
Response to Reply #7
8. It doesn't matter - This will not help Cheney/GOP and here's why
A lot of voters have "flip-flopped" on the invasion.

They believed the president when he said Saddam was going to attack us.

Now they see that it was basically all BS.

They supported Bush on the war. Now they see it was a mistake.

Check the polls - the number of people who believe Bush lied us into this war and that it was not worth it is growing.

If they feel manipulated by Bush, and they have changed their mind about the war, do you think they are going to take kindly to Cheney's BS?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
auburngrad82 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 07:10 AM
Response to Original message
9. Kerry and Edwards war votes
Yes, Kerry and Edwards voted to allow Dubya to go to war. But the fact remains that they, along with the rest of Congress as well as the American public and much of the world, were misled by the administration. I think Kerry/Edwards should turn it around on Dick/Dubya by pointing out that the root of the problem is the dishonesty of the administration. Over 1000 coaltion troops and countless thousands of Iraqis have died because of their lies.

Jay Rockefeller said last week that if he had known how weak the evidence was that the administration presented to congress he would not have voted for going to war.

It's ok to change your mind when your decision was based on lies and you were duped, along with virtually every politician in Washington, into believing the lies of Cheney and Bush.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
union_maid Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 07:37 AM
Response to Original message
10. But Cheney wins for Dumbest
Kerry and Edwards supported their president. They received intelligence that was anything but intelligent and they cast votes in support of a show of national unity that superseded partisan politics in the face of anyone who'd consider the US their enemy and at a time when we'd only recently been attacked on our own ground. We'd expect the same from the Republicans. In the end this administration led the charge to war, had the backing to get it done without the approval of any Democrats and now we know for sure that they fucked it up from the genesis of it and not just the exectution. Seems to me that dissing someone for supporting you when it turned out that you were working on false premises is not a very strong defense.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JI7 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 08:05 AM
Response to Original message
11. as if they would not have attacked or criticized any other vp choice
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Tom Rinaldo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 08:10 AM
Response to Reply #11
13. Yes they had ammunition stockpiled for each one
of our potential VP nominees. National Republicans go negative, that's what they do best, when they can't get away with only doing photo ops at flag factories. The line of attack would have changed, but attack they would.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Dr Fate Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Tue Jul-13-04 09:59 AM
Response to Original message
16. Except Kerry/Edwards never forged evidence or lied about WMDs.
I believe that was the Bush admin.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 06:17 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC