Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

If Senator Clinton is such a policy wonk...

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:23 PM
Original message
If Senator Clinton is such a policy wonk...
and has such a deep knowledge of how the country and the economy work, how come she is supporting this totally insane idea of a 'gas tax holiday'?

Just a quick once over: Price goes up when demand increases and supply can't keep up. That's why gas prices increase in the 'summer driving season'. If the price is reduced by a tax holiday as suggested there will be a very short window of lower prices, then demand jumps. There is no more supply, so the prices will climb back to current levels (at least). The only difference will be that the incremental revenue will accrue to the oil companies and the refiners.

The oil companies and the refiners will call it profit, and our highways and bridges will continue to fall down, we'll lose something in the range of 200,000 to 300,000 jobs when maintenance projects are shut down and real wages will drop again.

Not to mention that we'll burn that increased revenue in greenhouse gas producing internal combustion engines.

And, not to mention that the possibility of getting a 'gas tax holiday' enacted into law between now and Memorial Day is pretty damn close to zero.

The proposal is 100% pure pandering politics. I'm pleased Senator Obama rejected it, and I hope he won't backslide in the face of the storm of outrage being brewed up around his statements.

Senator Clinton should be ashamed.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
jakem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:23 PM
Response to Original message
1. Pandering wonk.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
speedoo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:27 PM
Response to Original message
2. To answer your question, she's desperate. nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
3. Pandering and lying to the voters. Obama should call her on it.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:30 PM
Response to Original message
4. Votes.
Plain and simple.

First ya gotta win the nomination. Then the G.E. After that you get to make changes.

Democracy sucks that way.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
RichardRay Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 08:34 PM
Response to Original message
5. As far as I can tell, I'm preaching to the choir here...
does that mean that everybody agrees that it's a silly idea?

(that, by the way, is a rhetorical question :-).

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 10:43 PM
Response to Reply #5
11. Yes, it's a silly idea, from a policy standpoint ...
... but such payoffs -- bribes for votes disguised as tax cuts or tax rebates -- have been shown to be effective in winning votes, so politicians are often quick to sacrifice sound long-term policy for quick short-term votes. Which is yet another reason why I have a hair more respect for Obama than Clinton or McCain.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dailykoff Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 09:03 PM
Response to Original message
6. Hey it worked for Dumya.
Stuff a couple hundred bucks in everybody's pocket and he gets reelected.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlueJac Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 10:04 PM
Response to Original message
7. Hillary is an idiot.......take that to the bank........
The Clintons are fools and the past shows it clearly, NAFTA!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
krkaufman Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 10:31 PM
Response to Original message
8. She got it half right, anyway.
She signed-on with her like-minded Republican fellow, McCain, is supporting a temporary rollback of the gas tax, but at least she proposed a way to pay for the revenue losses.... through a windfall profit tax on the oil companies.

The thing is... if she can get the windfall profit legislation passed, that is ALL that would be needed for prices to drop... and considerably more than the 18 cents from rollback of the gas tax.

Keep the gas tax in place, and bring back the windfall profits tax to bring the oil company profits into check and to help fund alternative energy projects.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
cliffordu Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 10:33 PM
Response to Original message
9. FOCK, LOL. Somehow I never associated Hillary with Policy wonk...
:rofl:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SemiCharmedQuark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Mon Apr-28-08 10:34 PM
Response to Original message
10. She used to think the idea was terrible.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Tue Apr 30th 2024, 12:35 PM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC