Democratic Underground Latest Greatest Lobby Journals Search Options Help Login
Google

"Uneducated black voters"

Printer-friendly format Printer-friendly format
Printer-friendly format Email this thread to a friend
Printer-friendly format Bookmark this thread
This topic is archived.
Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:39 AM
Original message
"Uneducated black voters"
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 06:39 AM by OzarkDem
Can you imagine the news media using a label like that to describe a candidate's voting base? Of course not, it would be considered irrelevant, unfair and offensive.

So why is it ok for the news media to parse Clinton's strong base of women voters and characterize them as "uneducated" and "downscale"?

Her base is no less educated than any other candidate's, Democrat or Republican. Its time to call out the news media for using these terms to describe any candidate or party's base of support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:42 AM
Response to Original message
1. I guess every state has its fair share of silly people
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 06:42 AM by blogslut
Ron Paul took 16% and Mike Huckabee got 11% of the republican vote in Pennsylvania last night.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forintegrity Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:44 AM
Response to Reply #1
3. I thought Huckabee was no longer running
Why was he even on the ballot?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
blogslut Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:50 AM
Response to Reply #3
6. Hell if I know
I'm just a high school educated, low-end, female Obama voter
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
forintegrity Donating Member (449 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:43 AM
Response to Original message
2. The news media is a waste of my time.
They have become the "National Enquirer" of TV!

Corporate whores.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:45 AM
Response to Reply #2
4. Sadly some fellow Dems are stooping to the same level n/t
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Forkboy Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:50 AM
Response to Original message
5. This has been an angle of attack from the media and some Obama supporters that bothers me.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:51 AM
Response to Reply #5
7. Thanks for saying it
:hug:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:53 AM
Response to Original message
8. What term would you prefer?
The exit polls indicate that Hillary does better with those voters who are less educated. Obama does better with folks who are more educated. It's a fair distinction to make. So how does one phrase that without sounding critical?

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
leftofcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:56 AM
Response to Reply #8
9. Oddly enough
everyone we know who voted for Hillary has a Ph.D
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #9
12. And Obama's base
is also made up of PhD's?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #9
23. Many of us do have grad. degrees.
That is true.

I think there is an inherant problem with using polling statistics to explain things like this to the public.

Tho actuarial information may be helpful to the campaigns, and to pundits who understand what they mean.... for most of the population, who don't deal in statistics everyday... the information is next to meaningless.

In a worst case scenario.... poorly understood numbers can be harmful. They could influence folks to vote one way or another. In other words... some people may think "I'd better vote with the educated, they know more than me." Or, they could go the other way and say "I don't trust the educated elite, if they are voting this way I will vote the other."

This is partly a problem with *too much* media coverage. They have nothing else to talk about 24/7. So they resort to polling data, which is fairly meaningless.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:33 PM
Response to Reply #9
64. I've got three post-baccalaureate degrees, and I support Sen. Clinton.
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 04:33 PM by dbaker41
But we're just poor dumb white folks ...

Bake, B.A., M.Div., M.B.A., J.D. (and I didn't bother to add the cum laudes ...)

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:59 AM
Response to Reply #8
11. Provide me with some proof
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 07:00 AM by OzarkDem
Sorry, I don't believe you. As I said in my OP, the news media is parsing Clinton's supporters to cast a negative view of them.

Obama no doubt has a portion of his base that is similar to Clinton's, but strangely, that reference isn't made.

And describe for me what "uneducated" means? The term implies a group of people who have never had any education whatsoever. That's a pretty rare phenomon in the US.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:40 AM
Response to Reply #11
34. well
I'm just going by reports of exit polling. I don't have any first-hand polling data to report to you. I'm sure you can Google it and find exit polling data from the various states.

Also, is the MSM really using the term "uneducated"? That is a misnomer if they are.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:45 AM
Response to Reply #34
36. MSNBC
used the terms "College graduates" in their exit polling dating.
I think the other end was "non college graduates" but not sure. It wasn't "uneducated" though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:49 AM
Response to Reply #36
37. That's fine then
Maybe we need to break up the country. Hillary can lead the old people, the women, the poor people, and the less educated. Obama can rule the black people, the more educated, and the more affluent. LOL

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shae Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:19 AM
Response to Reply #37
45. hey, wait a minute!
I'm one of the women. No fair dammit!!!:P
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 09:22 AM
Response to Reply #45
46. Sorry
We must adhere to strict categorization of people, based on the scientific principles of exit polling as reported by the MSM. No deviations will be allowed!

:)


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:59 PM
Response to Reply #34
54. You mean this exit polling?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DangerDave921 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:14 PM
Response to Reply #54
61. Go F yourself
No need to be a rude a-hole. Just point out the facts and educate me.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #11
76. "I don't believe you." Coming from someone who denies the video evidence that proves clinton lied...
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 08:18 PM by Zhade
...about Tuzla, you're not in the position to demand honesty from OTHERS.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:01 AM
Response to Reply #8
13. How about "working class"
or "union folk."

In other words... I think folks should be defined by what they are, not waht they aren't.

"Less educated" or "uneducated" is a negative.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:08 AM
Response to Reply #13
19. Re Clinton's base of women voters
I'm not sure even the demographic description is accurate. She has a very large base of women voters. I can't believe that the majority of them have had no education.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #19
25. Good point.
And, as I said elsewhere in this thread....

I think the problem lies in an overuse of statistical data to fill up vapid air time.

Actuarial information is only so helpful. It can help a campaign manager to understand populations, but it does nothing to help us understand individual motives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:00 PM
Response to Reply #13
55. Also, it's not working class or union folk that make up her supporters.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
MonkeyFunk Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:18 PM
Response to Reply #8
75. Clinton won college grads in PA
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 06:58 AM
Response to Original message
10. It is getting a little bit old.
And insulting.

No wonder my working class friends get so sick of politics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
spinbaby Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:02 AM
Response to Original message
14. It's code
They mean racist hicks.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:02 AM
Response to Reply #14
15. Or if not rural, meatheads.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:05 AM
Response to Reply #15
17. Ok to use the same terms to describe black voters?
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 07:06 AM by OzarkDem
Just wondering. :shrug:

Didn't the MSM use "values voters" to refer to rural voters in the last election?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:04 AM
Response to Reply #14
16. If they're referring to women voters
they're wrong.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:08 AM
Response to Original message
18. The reason that the phrase never comes up is not because the media assumes that all black people...
have PhDs you realize.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:09 AM
Response to Reply #18
22. Of course
and all women voters have no education, too. :sarcasm:
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JVS Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:11 AM
Response to Reply #22
24. Play that victim card. It goes over great in Hillary's PA T-zone.
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 07:11 AM by JVS
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:13 AM
Response to Reply #24
26. And Obama supporters wonder
why the women Clinton supporters say they won't vote for him if he makes it to the GE.

Could it be they're tired of the Archie Bunker style insults?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
JoFerret Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
20. Absolutely.
.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:09 AM
Response to Original message
21. How about Obama supporters are over educated pompous asses, bet that would
make some of them squeal, but isn't that about the opposite?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
susankh4 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
27. Hahahhhaaaaaa....
Nice to see a sense of humor this morning! Great way to diffuse the tension.

Thanks for that characterization. It shows how silly all the parsing of our candidates' support really is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:17 AM
Response to Reply #21
28. It is not hard to see which side of the education dichotomy you fall on.
I believe educated and uneducated are pretty classic opposites.

"verly educated pompous asses" and "dumb-shit knuckle-draggers" would be opposites.

I think maybe this could have been picked up watching Sesame Street? I recommend it.

In either case, I don't subscribe to the very Republican concept of anti-intellectualism, but yes, I am a pompous ass.

Cheers.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Name removed Donating Member (0 posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:28 AM
Response to Reply #28
32. Deleted message
Message removed by moderator. Click here to review the message board rules.
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:37 AM
Response to Reply #32
33. Confirmed.
Yes, the Obama team is entirely in charge of the media and exit polls. Having planted the secret code word "uneducated" our next plan is to get rid of all small sized lattes and create a new, larger sized one. The old medium is the new small. The old large is the new medium. The new large is enormous. You can now see the genius of our plan.

With these larger sized lattes available to us, we will be able to further subjugate the working class.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:49 PM
Response to Reply #33
50. It's replies exactly like this with your condescending tone that makes people dislike you and
the Obama team.You think your being funny but it just makes you look more the pompous ass. What exactly is wrong with trying to reach out to people who disagree with you and find out where the problem lies? Oh that's right it's every body else's fault for not "getting" you, not your fault for not explaining or even trying to find out what the problem is.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:18 PM
Response to Reply #50
59. Let's turn this around...
"How about Obama supporters are over educated pompous asses..." - madmom

It's replies exactly like this with your judgmental tone that makes people dislike you and the Clinton team. You think your being funny but it just makes you look more the judgmental ass. What exactly is wrong with trying to reach out to people who disagree with you and find out where the problem lies? Oh that's right it's every body else's fault for not "getting" you, not your fault for not explaining or even trying to find out what the problem is.


---

Funny how that works, applies just as well to you as it does to me. I only had to change "pompous" to "judgmental."

I'd never bother make that argument to begin with though, as I don't judge a campaign by what some anonymous people on the internet have to say.

Lastly, I'm not so self-important to believe myself to be on the "Obama team." I am one of 300 million dipshits in this country that has an opinion.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Bake Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:37 PM
Response to Reply #59
65. Well, you're partially correct anyway ...
You got the "dipshit" part right.

Bake
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:44 PM
Response to Reply #65
66. *golf clap* (nt)
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
madmom Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:04 PM
Response to Reply #59
71. Funny how this started out with this little gem of a statement..


"Clinton's strong base of women voters and characterize them as "uneducated" and "downscale"?"

I was just wondering if the opposite was opined if it would be ok, apparently not. You don't like being called names neither does anyone else!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Umbram Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:13 PM
Response to Reply #71
72. Agreed.
I don't think "uneducated" is an appropriate term to use for individuals who lack college educations. Did I say I did?

In fact, it is as ridiculous as the "latte liberal" term that has been being thrown around for a while now, the one you were opining on, as if it hasn't been being used to create an artificial cleavage between democrats for months now. It is rather disingenuous to pretend that Clinton's supporters haven't been painting Obama's supporters as wealthy, elitist, latte-sipping brats for over a month now. It seems to me that you don't have to "wonder," as doing that merely pretends Clinton's supporters have no culpability in the foolishness of this artificial class divide that the media has cooked up.

Search the term "latte liberal" if you like.

You can paint Obama supporters as the Boogie men if it pleases you, but take a look at those around you every so often.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:20 PM
Response to Reply #33
77. LOL! Nice pwnage, man.
SMACKDOWN.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:18 AM
Response to Original message
29. Because she does better with lower income women than higher income women.
And her base is less educated than Obama's. He does better with college educated voters and she does better with non-college educated voters.

Downscale is a short cut.

Its pure demographics.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:21 AM
Response to Reply #29
30. Got a link?
Because I suspect its a myth.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:27 AM
Response to Reply #30
31. Here's California.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:51 AM
Response to Reply #31
38. It doesn't break down education by gender or race/ethnicity
That's the problem.

The news media and punditocracy are linking women and uneducated voters together, but they aren't doing the same for other groups - gender, ethnic and racial subsets.

As someone posted upthread, the opinion shapers are wading too far into the demographic weeds on this issue and seem to be doing so in a very focused fashion.

We're seeing many characterizations of women voters during this election that we've not seen in previous elections:

uneducated

redneck

aging disenchanted feminists

blue collar (an odd one considering most blue collar jobs are male dominated; perhaps they mean "pink collar")

obese

low income

old/aging


I expect we'll see a lot more of this in coming weeks as the media and Obama campaign react more strongly to the core bloc of women voters who continue to turn out for Clinton.


Some interesting Google searches

Clinton "uneducated women" 3,930 hits

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=+Clinton%22uneducated+women%22+&btnG=Search

Obama "uneducated men" 682 hits

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&safe=off&q=+Obama+%22uneducated+men%22+&btnG=Search
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
dkf Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:41 AM
Response to Reply #30
35. Found a compilation of exit polls
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:54 AM
Response to Reply #35
41. Thanks
I have to get to work, but I'm going to analyze these later. I suspect we're going to see many of these claims are unfounded.

Linking exit poll demographics with news media reporting is also showing some interesting things.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
varelse Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:52 AM
Response to Original message
39. So, let me get this straight...
from looking at endless threads on the same subject, "crafted" by supporters of both the candidates... we, the unwashed, non-degreed voters... don't count as much as you, the college graduates? It's been said upthread, but I'll echo it - no wonder so many working class people are sick of the whole damn process.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:00 AM
Response to Reply #39
42. I agree with you
First, no one who doesn't have a college degree should EVER be referred to as uneducated. That's an unacceptable bias being seen in the media these days.

Its that media characterization of voters that somehow implies anyone without a college degree is somehow an inferior class of voter. They're not. Then, its the questionable linking of this condescending terminology to groups of voters - in this case women - that is the real problem.

Its one thing to see Republicans pulling this stuff, but Democrats should avoid it. Its not what we stand for.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
knixphan Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:11 PM
Response to Reply #42
49. agreed
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:24 PM
Response to Reply #42
78. That's why "low information voter" is so much more descriptive.
It takes into account the general lack of geopolitical awareness that allows people to, say, believe clinton ran from nonexistent sniper fire when it was in fact - and proven to be - a lie.


Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goclark Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 07:53 AM
Response to Original message
40. I agree with you ~ every voter has worth
and if every vote counts the same ~ what difference does it make.

It is unamerican to me to even discuss demographics.

For example, I am African American and they lump us together(male/female) and consider White Women a special breed.

What about Asian women,Latino women ~ we all have worth as "Women" too!


This is sexist!
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
OzarkDem Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:02 AM
Response to Reply #40
43. Agree, every voter is valuable
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
zbdent Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:14 AM
Response to Original message
44. maybe the "uneducated" and "downscale" voters is a reference to
the Rushbots who followed orders like a Pavlovian experiment?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
nichomachus Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:07 PM
Response to Original message
47. Don't think that Clinton's pollsters don't slice and dice voters this way
Of course they do. This is how they segregate demographics. This is how they plan their attack ads and their negative ads. They target "uneducated" and "downscale" people -- and they can tell you just how many there are and where.

This is done all the time. The media picks up on it because they use the same pollsters are their consultants.



Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
anonymous171 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 12:08 PM
Response to Original message
48. Uneducated, working class voters? You mean McCain's base?
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
SeattleGirl Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:55 PM
Response to Original message
51. The M$M is essentially full of shit.
I'm an Obama supporter, but I absolutely agree with you. Using terms like "uneducated" and "downscale" are inexcusable, and just flat-out lazy. Unfortunately, that seems to be the primary way they operate.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
BlooInBloo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:56 PM
Response to Original message
52. It's funny coming right after we saw Hicksylvania deliver a 9 point win to Clinton.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:01 PM
Response to Reply #52
58. Oh, you mean these voters?
http://www.democraticunderground.com/discuss/duboard.php?az=view_all&address=132x5647925

So, you're talking complete bollocks then? Yes, I thought so.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Phillycat Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 01:58 PM
Response to Original message
53. In addition to being offensive, it's also complete bullshit.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Writer Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
56. Never mind. n/t
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 02:01 PM by Writer
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
chascarrillo Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:00 PM
Response to Original message
57. K&R. It is a disgusting and inaccurate portrayal of Clinton's support.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 02:24 PM
Response to Original message
60. they dont say, "uneducated WHITE voters"
thanks for implying what you did, though. speaks volumes.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
ej510 Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:15 PM
Response to Reply #60
62. Black are not considered women or men educated or uneducated we are just black.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 04:20 PM
Response to Reply #62
63. yep. thats that hillarian wisdom. - nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Shakespeare Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:26 PM
Response to Reply #60
68. This OP has already had numerous racist posts (in various threads) deleted.
My alert button's about worn out. Not sure why she's still here, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
goletian Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:44 PM
Response to Reply #68
70. i alerted instantly as well. glad to see im no tthe only one that notices this kind of crap. - nt
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
barack the house Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:25 PM
Response to Original message
67. The fact they mention color at all is a big issues to start with. It should be age and gender that's
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 05:25 PM by barack the house
all really. As the 2 sexes have vastly different perspectives.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
tritsofme Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 05:32 PM
Response to Reply #67
69. When you are pulling in 90% of the vote in a certain demographic
Of course its going to get play in the media.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Erin Elizabeth Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:14 PM
Response to Original message
73. I would call her base extremely delusional at this point, though.
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
Zhade Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:16 PM
Response to Original message
74. The difference: "uneducated" isn't an inborn trait that's wrong to scorn, "black" (or any color) is.
I can't believe this has to be explained to anyone in this day and age.

Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
stillcool Donating Member (1000+ posts) Send PM | Profile | Ignore Wed Apr-23-08 08:31 PM
Response to Original message
79. Maybe it is code for 'racist'
Edited on Wed Apr-23-08 08:32 PM by stillcool47
Printer Friendly | Permalink |  | Top
 
DU AdBot (1000+ posts) Click to send private message to this author Click to view 
this author's profile Click to add 
this author to your buddy list Click to add 
this author to your Ignore list Mon May 06th 2024, 12:34 AM
Response to Original message
Advertisements [?]
 Top

Home » Discuss » Archives » General Discussion: Presidential (Through Nov 2009) Donate to DU

Powered by DCForum+ Version 1.1 Copyright 1997-2002 DCScripts.com
Software has been extensively modified by the DU administrators


Important Notices: By participating on this discussion board, visitors agree to abide by the rules outlined on our Rules page. Messages posted on the Democratic Underground Discussion Forums are the opinions of the individuals who post them, and do not necessarily represent the opinions of Democratic Underground, LLC.

Home  |  Discussion Forums  |  Journals |  Store  |  Donate

About DU  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy

Got a message for Democratic Underground? Click here to send us a message.

© 2001 - 2011 Democratic Underground, LLC